collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by tower912
[Today at 06:52:38 AM]


[Paint Touches] Big East programs ranked by NBA representation by GoldenEagles03
[April 27, 2024, 11:54:22 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by tower912
[April 27, 2024, 08:53:54 PM]


Banquet by tower912
[April 27, 2024, 07:39:53 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by MuMark
[April 27, 2024, 04:23:26 PM]


[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by mugrad_89
[April 27, 2024, 12:29:11 PM]


Kolek throwing out first pitch at White Sox game by MU82
[April 27, 2024, 08:16:25 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Rosiak = ?  (Read 3531 times)

dbwarriors

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Rosiak = ?
« on: February 17, 2009, 10:59:10 PM »
Let me preface this post by saying that I'm relatively new to posting on this board (have been reading it for a few years).  Overall, it's fun to read the posts & hear all of us talking about MU b-ball, a team/school I take great pride in as an alum.

One thing that irks me is this Rosiak character from the Milw Journal Sentinel.  This guy is completely useless.  His articles usually provide absolutely zero insight & he is ALWAYS misquoting folks & providing stats that contain errors.  Anywho, just needed to get that off my chest.  I believe following MU b-ball is his major role at the newspaper. 

I've heard an interview with him as well & he provides zilch during those dialogues.

Quite frankly, he is a disgrace to his profession.  (I'm really a good guy but had to get this off my chest).

Go MU!

MUUWUWM

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 724
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2009, 11:00:24 PM »
ummmm I'm actually speechless.

mugoose

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2009, 11:02:05 PM »
you're an idiot. rosiak is great.

bma725

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2440
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2009, 11:02:24 PM »
You must not have been around for the Lori Nickel or D. Orlando Ledbetter eras.

Rosiak is a godsend compared to some of the people that used to cover the team for the JS.

dbwarriors

  • Scholarship Player
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2009, 11:04:33 PM »
bma725- No doubt, my friend, no doubt.

I get frustrated with Chicago writers all the time, especially at the Sun Times (aka the Chicago version of the National Enquirer).

foreverwarriors

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2009, 11:04:59 PM »
For all the UW-centric crap that the Journal brings out, Rosiak is a complete breath of fresh air. Daily, he is able to come out with numerous stories about the team and does a much better job at covering MU than the UW and UWM beat writers do at covering their teams.

Eye

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1512
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2009, 11:08:53 PM »
As a former newspaper guy, I think Rosiak does a pretty good job. I'd love to rip on the JS, and I think they do very poorly in some respects, but TR isn't one of them most of the time.
GO WARRIORS!

Niv Berkowitz

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1302
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2009, 07:34:02 AM »
It's good to see Lori Nickel has a userID on this site now. Hi, Lori.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2009, 08:12:04 AM »
Good god.

We have people ripping the walk-on player in one thread, and then ripping the beat writer (who does a very nice job) in another.

Is it a full moon or something?

lab_warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2009, 08:18:39 AM »
I am kind of wondering how anybody could NOT like Rosiak.  He does a great job.

lab_warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2009, 08:19:25 AM »
And I wasn't RIPPING the walk-on player.  I was saying that some other bench guys should get some minutes.  READ...and comprehend, please.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2009, 08:21:31 AM »
And I wasn't RIPPING the walk-on player.  I was saying that some other bench guys should get some minutes.  READ...and comprehend, please.

I wasn't referring to you.

Please read ErickJD08's posts in the "frozena" thread.


MU86NC

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 246
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2009, 08:33:47 AM »
Maybe you should consider sticking to the reading of posts...

Rosiak has been very positive for MU Bball.

Wade for President

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1007
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2009, 08:36:12 AM »
It's good to see Lori Nickel has a userID on this site now. Hi, Lori.


and if I remember correctly, Lori Nickel wasn't too bad on the eyes either. :)

Brewtown Andy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
    • Anonymous Eagle
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2009, 09:09:11 AM »
he is ALWAYS misquoting folks
Say what now?
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

Nukem2

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4992
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2009, 09:32:19 AM »
Rosiak is very solid and objective.  Can't ask for more.

GuyIncognito

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2009, 10:03:37 AM »
and if I remember correctly, Lori Nickel wasn't too bad on the eyes either. :)

meh, certainly no Erin Andrews  :P

http://www.highschooljournalism.org/Students/Ask_A_Pro/Bio.cfm?authorid=23

MR.HAYWARD

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1701
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2009, 10:30:18 AM »
Mu does not get anywhere near the coverage that other BE programs get in the Urinal.  That is not Rosiak's fault.  he does a pretty good job witht he very limited space he gets, the half page articles and depth that other programs get is apparently just not going to happen with the Urinal.  Small pregame and post game articales are apparently all the Urinal will ever allow.  The blog definitely helps adn is a huge improvement to the coverage.  I agree with the others....Todd is an incredible improvement over Nickel..not sure if she ever covered a sports team before she got the MU gig, reading her stuff never gave the indication she had.  DOL was simply a hater..a Sincy grad on top of it.  Before them was Berghaus if i recall and he was not bad in the paragraph the Urinal gave him.

Ready2Fly

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: Rosiak = ?
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2009, 10:35:33 AM »
I love Rosiak.  His offseason stuff was like oxygen to a drowning man.  And he is always ALWAYS objective.