collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Another Pointless Thread by The_Blaze
[Today at 12:31:01 AM]


I don't have a single positive from this game by BLWarrior91
[December 18, 2025, 11:15:12 PM]


We're officially at Defcon 0.0 by MuggsyB
[December 18, 2025, 10:57:35 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by GoldenEagles03
[December 18, 2025, 10:36:13 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by wadesworld
[December 18, 2025, 09:54:09 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[December 18, 2025, 07:54:44 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by HutchwasClutch
[December 18, 2025, 07:48:54 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ Creighton

Marquette
69
Marquette @
Creighton
Date/Time: Dec 20, 2025, 7:30pm
TV: NBCSN
Schedule for 2025-26
Georgetown
78

nyg

I agree, 86 is a grade.  No way is he ranked that high, he's not ranked on any recruiting site. The 69th (???) PF.

bma725

Quote from: NotAnAlum on October 27, 2008, 01:18:55 PM
How can he be the 86th ranked player in the class but only the 69th best power forward?  Unless we are misinterpreting the number 86 as it is listed as a grade.

He is rated an 86 out of 100 possible points, not the 86th ranked player.  His rating puts him just inside the top 300 players in the country.

🏀

Quote from: bma725 on October 27, 2008, 01:27:51 PM
He is rated an 86 out of 100 possible points, not the 86th ranked player.  His rating puts him just inside the top 300 players in the country.

TOP 300 HERE WE COME!

bilsu

He is a rising player, it does not matter where he is ranked now. It matters what he is 1, 2, 3 or 4 years from now. Many players who are good early do not improve much.

LastWarrior

"80-89: Player has the potential to start or significantly contribute as a freshman for most top national Division I programs."


Who knows how valid these ratings are but he apparently played well enough to impress this scout.  I'm much more optimistic after seeing this review on ESPN than what I read over the weekend.
"The Lord is a Warrior" - Exodus 15:3

avid1010

Sometimes I could swear half the people on this site must have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.  I'll trust Buzz's judgment of talent over mine or anyone else on this site.  He doesn't have a bad track record in his previous positions.

reinko

Quote from: marqptm on October 27, 2008, 11:11:19 AM
A ginger...gross...

+1

Gingers and fat point guards were my favorite players to make fun, now they are the future of our program...ugh

strobl2

With this signing and the rest of our '09 class it seems we will be very well rounded. The only question is who will be our 3 point shooters. Are Butler, buycks, cadougan, or williams good 3 point shooters. I am asking because I don't really know.

ATWizJr


spartan3186

Red heads... there was a South Park episode about it

Thomas' Danish Delight

Quote from: strobl2 on October 27, 2008, 06:49:53 PM
With this signing and the rest of our '09 class it seems we will be very well rounded. The only question is who will be our 3 point shooters. Are Butler, buycks, cadougan, or williams good 3 point shooters. I am asking because I don't really know.

Hayward can hit the three, I mean, doesn't he have the highest 3PT pct?  And Fulce has a real smooth release as well. 

bma725

Quote from: strobl2 on October 27, 2008, 06:49:53 PM
With this signing and the rest of our '09 class it seems we will be very well rounded. The only question is who will be our 3 point shooters. Are Butler, buycks, cadougan, or williams good 3 point shooters. I am asking because I don't really know.

Butler had a good percentage in JUCO, but I don't think he took many 3 pointers, so it may have been a case of the small sample size working in his favor.  Of the others, Buycks is more of a slasher than 3 point shooter, Cadougan and Maymon aren't really perimeter threats at this point.  Williams has good form, but doesn't take many because he's very good off the dribble and can get by most guys that are guarding him.

77ncaachamps

Quote from: reinko on October 27, 2008, 06:45:43 PM
+1

Gingers and fat point guards were my favorite players to make fun, now they are the future of our program...ugh

Don't knock Matt Bonner...he's still playing! ;)

But Khalid was out of the league quick!
SS Marquette

ATWizJr

Generation gap on that ginger reference.  Thanks Spartan.

Previous topic - Next topic