Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Seton Hall Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by The Sultan
[Today at 08:07:37 AM]


Radio show 2/5 by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 07:40:55 AM]


Senior shooting by MarquetteMike1977
[February 05, 2026, 11:35:23 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by GoldenEagles03
[February 05, 2026, 11:28:02 PM]


Top 5 MU perimeter defenders ? by DoctorV
[February 05, 2026, 10:11:13 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[February 05, 2026, 08:23:06 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by tower912
[February 05, 2026, 08:13:27 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  Butler (National Marquette Day)

Marquette
64
Marquette vs
Butler
Date/Time: Feb 7, 2026, 1:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Seton Hall
69

THRILLHO

This team is far from being world beaters on the glass, but my subjective sense was that they're a lot less frustrating than last year. On kenpom we're at 232/209, whereas we ended last year at 325/314. That's a big improvement, while still matching the experts predictions that we'll never be a great rebounding team.
So how did we get better when losing our two best rebounders and not really replacing their size? To me it really does just look like effort, guys are grabbing the ball with more "violence" than last year. Anyone have a more sophisticated explanation?

wadesworld

Definitely a better rebounding team than I expected. Raises the team's floor.

tower912

Guards are dropping down instead of leaking out.    More tipping the ball with intent when it can't be immediately secured.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Also in honor of Pope Leo,  I have no enemies.  I have brothers and sisters I sometimes disagree with.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: tower912 on December 13, 2022, 12:56:51 PM
Guards are dropping down instead of leaking out.    More tipping the ball with intent when it can't be immediately secured.

I swear every time we tipped it last season it went straight to an opponent. That has been a welcome improvement this season.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


jfp61

Quote from: THRILLHO on December 13, 2022, 12:50:26 PM
This team is far from being world beaters on the glass, but my subjective sense was that they're a lot less frustrating than last year. On kenpom we're at 232/209, whereas we ended last year at 325/314. That's a big improvement, while still matching the experts predictions that we'll never be a great rebounding team.
So how did we get better when losing our two best rebounders and not really replacing their size? To me it really does just look like effort, guys are grabbing the ball with more "violence" than last year. Anyone have a more sophisticated explanation?

The main reason we rebound better is the intent that was dedicated this summer. The guards drop down more defensively and are prepared to gather tipped balls, and Oso is tipping them smartly.

With regards to just offensive rebounding, Morsell and Lewis's midrange shots were a problem. Not because of how well those two shot that shot, but because those shots weren't ever in the flow or design of the offense. So when they took them, no one tried to rebound offensively. When either of them were off the court, the team rebounded +3 percent better offensively. Part of that is the opponent a bit too, but its still the case when you filter out "garbage time" possessions.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: jfp61 on December 13, 2022, 07:03:58 PM
The main reason we rebound better is the intent that was dedicated this summer. The guards drop down more defensively and are prepared to gather tipped balls, and Oso is tipping them smartly.

With regards to just offensive rebounding, Morsell and Lewis's midrange shots were a problem. Not because of how well those two shot that shot, but because those shots weren't ever in the flow or design of the offense. So when they took them, no one tried to rebound offensively. When either of them were off the court, the team rebounded +3 percent better offensively. Part of that is the opponent a bit too, but its still the case when you filter out "garbage time" possessions.

Another great post!

Previous topic - Next topic