McAdams v. Lovell

[Ellenson Guerrero]

Given that the other McAdams thread was shut down prematurely, here are links to the latest back and forth between Lovell and McAdams in the Wall Street Journal:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/a-jesuit-school-gets-dogmatic-1515362173


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/marquette-responds-to-criticism-about-firing-1515705156


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fired-for-exposing-a-colleagues-misbehavior-1516123459

[GGGG]

Given that the other McAdams thread was shut down prematurely, here are links to the latest back and forth between Lovell and McAdams in the Wall Street Journal:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/a-jesuit-school-gets-dogmatic-1515362173


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/marquette-responds-to-criticism-about-firing-1515705156


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fired-for-exposing-a-colleagues-misbehavior-1516123459

"Michael Lovell claims I had "shamed" and "harassed" Ms. Abbate. But any journalist who exposes misconduct could be said to have "shamed" or "harassed" the subject of the reporting."

He isn't a reporter.  He's a professor and member of a community.  (I can't read the rest since I don't have a subscription.  Perhaps he clarified this line of "thinking?")

[real chili 83]

This thread isn't going to end well

In before the lock!

[ZiggysFryBoy]

This is why we can't have nice things.  Or even mediocre things, like Rocky's 17 year old server.

[mu_hilltopper]

Yeah, we're done with this topic. 

EllensonG, I know you are dying to discuss this, wanting to get in your viewpoint another dozen times.

I prescribe three beef and cheddars for your woes.