collapse

Resources

Stud of Xavier Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[Today at 12:26:38 AM]


Really Good Day for the Future of Marquette Basketball by rocky_warrior
[Today at 12:20:53 AM]


Shaka cost us the game tonite by MarquetteMike1977
[February 15, 2026, 10:36:03 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[February 15, 2026, 09:15:02 PM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by GoldenEagles03
[February 15, 2026, 09:01:12 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by Newsdreams
[February 15, 2026, 07:16:49 PM]


MU/XU Game Thread by willie warrior
[February 15, 2026, 11:36:52 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  St. John's

Marquette
88
Marquette vs
St. John's
Date/Time: Feb 18, 2026, 8:00pm
TV: TNT
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
96


DJO's Jaw

Definitely a good read. Goes to show perception doesn't always equal reality.

MU B2002

I am more interested in our defensive stats ATO, as it seems the opposing team "always" scores.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

tower912

The opposing team always scores anyway, hard to tell the difference. 
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Also in honor of Pope Leo,  I have no enemies.  I have brothers and sisters I sometimes disagree with.

MarquetteDano

Isn't Marquette's PPP much higher overall than out of timeouts?  I guess that is due to turnovers created and other related transition points pushing up the overall PPP.

It would be interesting to  compare our PPP ATO versus a half-court set PPP (i.e. no transition PPP).

brewcity77

I thought the same Dano. Made me wonder if timeout scenarios benefit the defense more.

Marcus92

If our PPP is lower coming out of a timeout, that might make some sense — think about moments late in the half or in the game, when you're trying to get a score and use all available time on the clock. In instances like these, the clock can work against efficient offense.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

brewcity77

Possibility of a shorter clock, defense is always set, and the most likely time a defensive change or adjustment will be made. A lot of reasons ATO situations are more difficult to score in.

Folks,,,

Were people thinking Buzz ran good out of bounds plays? I recall a lot of "lob the ball into the back court" plays where it seemed like the goal was just to get the ball in play.

PaintTouches

Quote from: MarquetteDano on February 09, 2017, 02:28:23 PM
Isn't Marquette's PPP much higher overall than out of timeouts?  I guess that is due to turnovers created and other related transition points pushing up the overall PPP.

It would be interesting to  compare our PPP ATO versus a half-court set PPP (i.e. no transition PPP).

PPP on ATOs
2017: .944
2016: .966
2014: .798
2013: .736

PPP in HalfCourt
2017: .997
2016: .900
2014: .880
2013: .857

PPP Difference (ATO-Half)
2017: -.053
2016: .066
2014: -.082
2013: -.121

Daniel

Quote from: Folks, on February 09, 2017, 03:24:06 PM
Were people thinking Buzz ran good out of bounds plays? I recall a lot of "lob the ball into the back court" plays where it seemed like the goal was just to get the ball in play.

We'd hold our breath hoping that they could inbound the ball at all, under Buzz!   Was never pretty or easy

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Previous topic - Next topic