Wrong. I have no dog in this hunt, and I've made no such analogy. I merely pointed out the fact that most people do sympathize differently with victims of crime/violence depending upon the circumstances. Apparently, you do understand that now. You're welcome. But what you're still failing to grasp is that you can have varying feelings without assessment of whether or not it was deserved.
You want to build strawmen, go right ahead; but I'm the owl watching over your barn, not the crow eating your corn.
The conversation I was having was never about whether or not you could have differing levels of sympathy for different victims of the same crime. The conversation was about whether or not less sympathy was warranted for this specific victim and why. I assumed your comment was about that conversation, not the one that was happening with a different poster. My apologies.
