Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Pakuni
[Today at 06:42:25 PM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by 79Warrior
[Today at 06:14:46 PM]


6th Year Players - Career Games Played by wadesworld
[Today at 06:11:53 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Newsdreams
[Today at 04:15:40 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[Today at 02:37:19 PM]


Top 50 HS Basketball recruits vs the Portal by Mu8891
[Today at 02:06:25 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Spaniel with a Short Tail
[Today at 02:03:51 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

https://www.youtube.com/v/yfGOJKbqrWk

When it comes to topics like this, how should we as a society approach it? Should it be a free market response - ie, consumers get sick, companies get punished (financially or otherwise) and then companies change? Or should this be government intervention ahead of time - ie, restrictions, inspections, regulations, etc? It's a tough line to walk.

I understand that companies are out to make a profit, and therefore aren't necessarily going to do things to protect/benefit consumer if the costs outweigh the benefits. In that case, however, don't we rely on the government to protect us? If so, why are we so woefully underfunded and undermanned when it comes to our regulatory bodies (in this case, UDSA, FDA, etc)

Previous topic - Next topic