collapse

Resources

Stud of Seton Hall Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Losing the Fight by onepost
[Today at 01:44:29 PM]


Path to Success 2025-26 in 2026: Rotations by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 01:14:07 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by BE_GoldenEagle
[Today at 10:24:24 AM]


How bad is MU's shooting .... by cheebs09
[Today at 09:43:19 AM]


Tre Norman by SOSW
[Today at 08:48:56 AM]


Happy New Year by Hards Alumni
[Today at 06:46:14 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by Hards Alumni
[Today at 06:42:57 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ UConn

Marquette
73
Marquette @
UConn
Date/Time: Jan 4, 2026, 1:00pm
TV: NBC
Schedule for 2025-26
Seton Hall
79

Nevada233

#100
Better teamwork is needed asap

AZWarrior

Quote from: avid1010 on January 19, 2014, 12:34:54 PM
i thought i'd watch the game one more time just to really focus in on how butler guarded d. wilson and where his defender was on the court.  they didn't front DG at all times, and never fronted him when he was on the same side as d. wilson.  d. wilson's man had his foot in the lane the majority time on defense (they would front DG when he was on the strong side and d. wilson was on the weak side)...as d. wilson's guy could double from behind. made it impossible to get DG the ball without a double and really messed with any natural driving lanes.  i've supported buzz through and through, and i always did so by saying that i was only qualified to judge him on wins and losses.  in keeping with that thought, i don't think pointing to the fact that he plays d. wilson means much.  they're not winning.  he's shooting 38% for the year, 47% from the FT line, and 9% from the 3pt line. 

Avid - thanks for re-watching, and the analysis.  Real nice post.  I considered a re-watch but I lacked the courage.

If I'm an opposing coach, I'm going to do just what Butler did, eliminating DG's low post game and clogging the lane.

Given that assumption (that opposing coached will continue to do this to us), I'd like to hear from the board what adjustments Buzz should make to counter this move.  Eliminate Oxtule and put DG at the high post and run the offense through him?  I don't claim to know the answer.  I never coached and I learn a lot from the rational commentary on this board.  (were that there were only rational commentary...)

Anyway, what adjustments should Buzz make?
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

jesmu84

Quote from: AZWarrior on January 20, 2014, 06:56:28 PM
Avid - thanks for re-watching, and the analysis.  Real nice post.  I considered a re-watch but I lacked the courage.

If I'm an opposing coach, I'm going to do just what Butler did, eliminating DG's low post game and clogging the lane.

Given that assumption (that opposing coached will continue to do this to us), I'd like to hear from the board what adjustments Buzz should make to counter this move.  Eliminate Oxtule and put DG at the high post and run the offense through him?  I don't claim to know the answer.  I never coached and I learn a lot from the rational commentary on this board.  (were that there were only rational commentary...)

Anyway, what adjustments should Buzz make?

Agree with this. And, as a non-expert, I'd love to hear what some of the actual coaches would have to say. There are clearly other teams out there that are successful (or at least semi-successful) who can't shoot from 3. What does it take to overcome that?

Previous topic - Next topic