collapse

Resources

Stud of Detroit Mercy Game

Sananda Fru

8 points, 8 rebounds,
3 assists, 1 block,
1 steal, 22 minutes

2026-27 Season SoG Tally
Clark1
Fru1

'25-26
'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The Problem With NJ by GoFastAndWin
[Today at 07:30:14 PM]


Big East Non-Con Talk by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 07:13:01 PM]


2026-27 Big East TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 07:10:49 PM]


26-27 Miscellaneous college hoops thread by Newsdreams
[Today at 04:40:00 PM]


Marlon Martinez to MU by MuMark
[Today at 03:44:16 PM]


Four Questions by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[Today at 11:37:42 AM]


Welp! by wadesworld
[Today at 10:13:04 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  Missouri (@ United Center)

Marquette
70
Marquette vs
Missouri
Date/Time: Nov 15, 2026 / 1:30pm
TV: Peacock/NBCSN
Schedule for 2026-27
Michigan
84

PaintTouchesSays

Player Grades: Marquette vs DePaul
      


Written by: Andrei Greska
            


Vander Blue (18 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast) You can tell Blue has taken it to the next level when he has a quiet game and still scores 18. Vander had one nice pull-up jumper in the first but did ... Continue reading →


            

http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/
      

BM1090

Thanks.

Just fyi there is no blurb on Jamil and Mayo had more than three points.

PaintTouches


wadesworld

I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

AZWarrior

#4
Quote from: wadesworld on February 09, 2013, 04:24:48 PM
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?  You're a tough grader.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

wadesworld

Quote from: AZWarrior on February 09, 2013, 04:29:16 PM
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?You're a tough grader.

Our defense absolutely should have been better.  There is no doubt about that.  The offensive numbers were great, but so is every teams' who plays DePaul.

Nukem2

The grades should have been much lower given that no one played defense.

Previous topic - Next topic