collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 9/15/25 by Stretchdeltsig
[Today at 04:39:09 PM]


Welcome, BJ Matthews by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 12:21:42 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MU82
[Today at 12:15:58 PM]


[Cracked Sidewalks] Previewing Marquette's Schedule by PointWarrior
[September 16, 2025, 08:55:54 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

PaintTouchesSays

Player Grades: Marquette vs DePaul
      


Written by: Andrei Greska
            


Vander Blue (18 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast) You can tell Blue has taken it to the next level when he has a quiet game and still scores 18. Vander had one nice pull-up jumper in the first but did ... Continue reading →


            

http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/
      

BM1090

Thanks.

Just fyi there is no blurb on Jamil and Mayo had more than three points.

PaintTouches


wadesworld

I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

AZWarrior

#4
Quote from: wadesworld on February 09, 2013, 04:24:48 PM
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?  You're a tough grader.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

wadesworld

Quote from: AZWarrior on February 09, 2013, 04:29:16 PM
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?You're a tough grader.

Our defense absolutely should have been better.  There is no doubt about that.  The offensive numbers were great, but so is every teams' who plays DePaul.

Nukem2

The grades should have been much lower given that no one played defense.

Previous topic - Next topic