Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Providence Game

Adrien Stevens

21 points, 4 rebounds,
1 assist, 4 steals,
32 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Huskies SOTG by BM1090
[Today at 03:12:09 PM]


Transfers in/out 2025-2026 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 03:08:01 PM]


Can we win 4 more games? by Shooter McGavin
[Today at 03:05:50 PM]


RGV's Work by Newsdreams
[Today at 03:05:40 PM]


Thank you, Ben and Chase by DoctorV
[Today at 03:03:09 PM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 03:02:03 PM]


MU/UCONN Game Thread by The Sultan
[Today at 03:01:52 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  UConn

Marquette
78
Marquette vs
UConn
Date/Time: Mar 7, 2026, 11:30am
TV: Fox
Schedule for 2025-26
Providence
56

BCHoopster

The year MU won the 1977 championship they started playing more zone defense as Bernard
Toone had no idea how to play man.  Is there a reason Buzz does not play a zone once in awhile
to change it up, is he totally inflexible.  I look at EW and he reminds of BT, Jamil Jones we saw
today why he is not playing, he is definitely clueless.  So in saying that MU could play long with EW,
Otule and Butler with Vander and you are long. Anybody for 1-3-1 zone, with Butler and Vander on
the wings, pretty quick, hide EW or Jones in the middle, can MU at least try it?  It is a shame
Buzz does not try different types of D against this ridiculous schedule.  It is nice to play the 4 teams
early, but other than UWM, these patsies do nothing for this team to prepare for the Big East.  You
can play dogs, but how about teams from 100-200 instead of all the time in the 300's?  Any thoughts?

Sharpie

I have been thinking the exact same thing in regards to playing a zone. In response to scheduling, it's much more difficult to schedule a lot of good teams than most think for ooc play. It would be nice to get these guys (especially a young team like this year) but it's not always possible. Would be nice though.

Nukem2

Was talking about this at the BC yesterday at half-time.  Believe MU could play some 1-3-1 zone to take advantage of the length of the team on the wings.  Playing other types of zones would negate the team's strong point of quickness.

GGGG

It's not as though it would make their perimeter defense any worse.  But in many ways, it is a harder defense to play.  Don't think that you could get away with playing Williams more by "hiding" him in a zone because good teams will figure that stuff out.

But yeah, it is worth a shot.

ChicosBailBonds

The downside is playing a zone defense hurts rebounding and we already need some help there.

Daniel

Would be nice to try it even for one or two possesions, just to mix it up.

downtown85

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 19, 2010, 02:25:52 PM
The downside is playing a zone defense hurts rebounding and we already need some help there.

Normally I would agree with you, but can it really get any worse?  We're rebounding like we are playing zone anyway.  May as well get some of the benefit of playing zone. 

Previous topic - Next topic