collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by MU82
[Today at 04:16:15 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MU82
[Today at 03:56:56 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by dpucane
[Today at 03:10:59 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 12:26:10 PM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 03:25:38 AM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by MuggsyB
[December 24, 2025, 10:09:03 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by marqfan22
[December 24, 2025, 08:24:00 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

KC_Warrior


Litehouse

I'm becoming more and more convinced Lunardi doesn't know jack.

LON

Quote from: Litehouse on March 04, 2010, 10:42:09 AM
I'm becoming more and more convinced Lunardi doesn't know jack.

He's horrific at picking seeds

And it's not that terribly tough to pick who's in/who's out...

It's ESPN pimping their product, and there's nothing new about that.

Pakuni

#3
Quote from: KC_Warrior on March 04, 2010, 10:39:10 AM
Lunardi has us playing Cal in OKC.  The winner to play Kansas St.

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

Kinda doubt K-State gets a #1 seed, but if so, that's not such a bad potential second-round setup. MU would matchup with them a lot better than most, if not all, other potential 1/2 seeds.

Still, have to wonder how MU dropped a spot in Lunardi's mind without playing.

copious1218

Quote from: Pakuni on March 04, 2010, 10:48:18 AM

Still, have to wonder how MU dropped a spot in Lunardi's mind without playing.

I think in the previous bracketology we were an 8/9 that got moved up because Cuse was #1 in the bracket.

damuts222

Playing California in the first round wouldn't be bad though regardless. Probably the easiest 9 seed to play.
Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016

MUMBA

did you notice his Wisconsin vs Utah State matchup?  that's like a slow death for those fans that can't appreciate the athletisicm of the two-handed set-shot.

LON

Quote from: MUMBA on March 04, 2010, 10:55:07 AM
did you notice his Wisconsin vs Utah State matchup?  that's like a slow death for those fans that can't appreciate the athleticism of the two-handed set-shot.

that would be a legendary matchup

esotericmindguy

I remember discussing this last year when the real brackets came out, Lunardi is spot on with picking who makes it but pretty far off with seeds.  

When they beat ND and rutgers/hall, they will move up to a 6 or 7 IMO; I personally think they deserve a 6.  If you consider that Cuse is a 1, WV/Pitt 2s or 3s and Pitt a 4 or 5 then MU should get a 6 or 7...natural progression right?  I think the committee can throw out the Depaul game as a anomaly at this point.  MU has proven, at worst, to be the 5th best team in the top conference.

goodgreatgrand

Quote from: damuts222 on March 04, 2010, 10:52:35 AM
Playing California in the first round wouldn't be bad though regardless. Probably the easiest 9 seed to play.

Completely disagree. They started the season without Theo Robertson. They are slowly playing better and better. Good 3 pt shooting team that plays a similar lineup to MU.

warriors1991

If memory serves, the hated Badger nation went to the Final Four as an 8 seed? If I'm wrong feel free to correct........
If we get the right #1 in there (i.e. not Kansas or Kentucky) we can beat anybody on any given day. It just takes one game!

goodgreatgrand

Quote from: warriors1991 on March 04, 2010, 11:05:40 AM
If memory serves, the hated Badger nation went to the Final Four as an 8 seed? If I'm wrong feel free to correct........
If we get the right #1 in there (i.e. not Kansas or Kentucky) we can beat anybody on any given day. It just takes one game!

Not sure why people think we can beat Syracuse. They are undefeated on the road. We were down by 17 with 4 min to go. If u caught Boeheims post game presser, he said his team got lazy and lost focus at the end because they had been beating their competition handidly in their last couple games.

groove

Quote from: LancesOtherNut on March 04, 2010, 10:57:33 AM
that would be a legendary matchup

Depending on the lighting at the site, they may need to stock the concessions with sunscreen.

Litehouse

Quote from: esotericmindguy on March 04, 2010, 10:59:41 AM
I remember discussing this last year when the real brackets came out, Lunardi is spot on with picking who makes it but pretty far off with seeds.

Lunardi got 63 out of the 65 teams correct last year.  The last one or two are the only ones that are tough, and he got those wrong.  The first 63 are usually gimmees if you pay attention to this stuff.  To be fair, he got 65/65 in 2008, but I still don't see that as a huge accomplishment to proclaim him an authoritative source.

TallTitan34

How does he still have UConn in?  That's a complete joke at 17-13 (7-10).

TallTitan34

Also by putting UConn in, he is giving the Big East 9 teams.

Litehouse

I'd love to see 9 BE teams in the tourney.

bucksandy34

Quote from: warriors1991 on March 04, 2010, 11:05:40 AM
If memory serves, the hated Badger nation went to the Final Four as an 8 seed? If I'm wrong feel free to correct........
If we get the right #1 in there (i.e. not Kansas or Kentucky) we can beat anybody on any given day. It just takes one game!

Arizona was missing Loren Woods so that helped the Badgers get by their #1 seed that year.

Previous topic - Next topic