Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Southern Game

Chase Ross

23 points, 6 rebounds,
6 assists, 1 block,
28 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross2

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Big East Thread by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 09:47:04 PM]


It's one game, but..... by wadesworld
[Today at 09:38:52 PM]


Hoosier beat down by Galway Eagle
[Today at 09:37:50 PM]


Indiana game thread by Farley36
[Today at 09:09:39 PM]


5th Year, so judge by tower912
[Today at 09:02:25 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 08:03:56 PM]


Roll Call / Planning - Nov 9 vs. I4 at United Center, Chicago by CountryRoads
[Today at 07:27:29 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Little Rock

Marquette
77
Marquette vs.
Little Rock
Date/Time: Nov 12, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Indiana
100

jaygall31

If we tie conference record as ND, what is the tiebreaker as to the 4 seed instead of the 5 seed?
It's not about ME,
It's about US.

muguru

Whoever beats the higher team in the standings. For instance, ND has beaten UCONN this year so as of right now, they would win the tiebreaker as MU's best win is against Cincinnati. Now, this will change if MU beats Georgetown. Let's say they do, then GT MUST finish higher then UCONN in the conference standings for MU to win the tiebreaker.
"Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity." Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

MarquetteDano

This is a shame they do the tie-breaker this way.  To be fair, after record, and head-to-head, it should be whoever had the harder schedule, as defined by total record of teams played.  I assume Marquette would be one of the highest of the conference this year, as we played UL, ND, and Seton Hall twice.

MUCrew

Tie Breakers always remind me of this quote from BASEketball:

Dan Patrick: With the first nine months of the Baseketball postseason out of the way, the playoff picture is starting to emerge.

Kenny Mayne: So, with last night's victory over Boston, next week the Milwaukee Beers must beat Indianapolis in order to advance to Charlotte. That's in an effort to reduce their magic number to three.

Dan Patrick: Right, and then the Beers can advance to the National Eastern Division North to play Tampa.

Kenny Mayne: So, if the Beers beat Detroit and Denver beats Atlanta in the American Southwestern Division East Northern, then Milwaukee goes to the Denslow Cup, unless Baltimore can upset Buffalo and Charlotte ties Toronto, then Oakland would play LA and Pittsburgh in a blind choice round robin. And if no clear winner emerges from all of this, a two-man sack race will be held on consecutive Sundays until a champion can be crowned.

MUFan07

Quote from: muguru on February 21, 2008, 07:22:52 PM
Whoever beats the higher team in the standings. For instance, ND has beaten UCONN this year so as of right now, they would win the tiebreaker as MU's best win is against Cincinnati. Now, this will change if MU beats Georgetown. Let's say they do, then GT MUST finish higher then UCONN in the conference standings for MU to win the tiebreaker.

I believe that UConn could not decide the tiebreaker between MU and ND.  ND is 1-1 while MU is 0-1.  If MU would have played UConn one more time they could potentially have won that game and been tied again with ND. 

From the Big East website:
2) Most wins do not prevail if the team with fewer wins could equal or surpass the win total of the
other team. Two examples of many scenarios that do not provide an advantage:
1) Team A 1-1   2) Team A 2-0
    Team B 0-1       Team B 1-0

Previous topic - Next topic