Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pope Leo XIV by Uncle Rico
[Today at 09:13:00 AM]


Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by MU82
[May 09, 2025, 08:33:38 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by muwarrior69
[May 09, 2025, 05:02:23 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[May 08, 2025, 01:47:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

THRILLHO

This team is far from being world beaters on the glass, but my subjective sense was that they're a lot less frustrating than last year. On kenpom we're at 232/209, whereas we ended last year at 325/314. That's a big improvement, while still matching the experts predictions that we'll never be a great rebounding team.
So how did we get better when losing our two best rebounders and not really replacing their size? To me it really does just look like effort, guys are grabbing the ball with more "violence" than last year. Anyone have a more sophisticated explanation?

wadesworld

Definitely a better rebounding team than I expected. Raises the team's floor.

tower912

Guards are dropping down instead of leaking out.    More tipping the ball with intent when it can't be immediately secured.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: tower912 on December 13, 2022, 12:56:51 PM
Guards are dropping down instead of leaking out.    More tipping the ball with intent when it can't be immediately secured.

I swear every time we tipped it last season it went straight to an opponent. That has been a welcome improvement this season.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


jfp61

Quote from: THRILLHO on December 13, 2022, 12:50:26 PM
This team is far from being world beaters on the glass, but my subjective sense was that they're a lot less frustrating than last year. On kenpom we're at 232/209, whereas we ended last year at 325/314. That's a big improvement, while still matching the experts predictions that we'll never be a great rebounding team.
So how did we get better when losing our two best rebounders and not really replacing their size? To me it really does just look like effort, guys are grabbing the ball with more "violence" than last year. Anyone have a more sophisticated explanation?

The main reason we rebound better is the intent that was dedicated this summer. The guards drop down more defensively and are prepared to gather tipped balls, and Oso is tipping them smartly.

With regards to just offensive rebounding, Morsell and Lewis's midrange shots were a problem. Not because of how well those two shot that shot, but because those shots weren't ever in the flow or design of the offense. So when they took them, no one tried to rebound offensively. When either of them were off the court, the team rebounded +3 percent better offensively. Part of that is the opponent a bit too, but its still the case when you filter out "garbage time" possessions.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: jfp61 on December 13, 2022, 07:03:58 PM
The main reason we rebound better is the intent that was dedicated this summer. The guards drop down more defensively and are prepared to gather tipped balls, and Oso is tipping them smartly.

With regards to just offensive rebounding, Morsell and Lewis's midrange shots were a problem. Not because of how well those two shot that shot, but because those shots weren't ever in the flow or design of the offense. So when they took them, no one tried to rebound offensively. When either of them were off the court, the team rebounded +3 percent better offensively. Part of that is the opponent a bit too, but its still the case when you filter out "garbage time" possessions.

Another great post!

Previous topic - Next topic