collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Congrats to Royce by BCHoopster
[Today at 09:23:41 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[Today at 06:40:19 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuggsyB
[Today at 06:27:04 PM]


NM by marqfan22
[Today at 05:53:46 PM]


More conference realignment talk by MU82
[Today at 04:02:10 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by dgies9156
[Today at 12:25:50 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by MU82
[Today at 11:09:52 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

SaveOD238

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on January 27, 2021, 11:25:54 AM
I haven't watched much CBB this year outside of MU, but based on historical precedent and the two big wins, I'd have to imagine that .500 in the BE gives Marquette a pretty good chance to get in.  At 4-5, obviously there is still a chance to get to .500 or better in the BE.  Whether or not they can do it...yeah, who knows.

Not with a NET in the high 70s.  I think we need to go 7-2 down the stretch at this point.

Galway Eagle

Is it better to play nova again and lose or not at all
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

MuggsyB

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on January 27, 2021, 11:25:54 AM
I haven't watched much CBB this year outside of MU, but based on historical precedent and the two big wins, I'd have to imagine that .500 in the BE gives Marquette a pretty good chance to get in.  At 4-5, obviously there is still a chance to get to .500 or better in the BE.  Whether or not they can do it...yeah, who knows.

Save is correct, it's about who you beat.  If we get to .500 with wins over Creighton and Villanova there's a chance.  We're not getting in if our remaining wins are the bottom feeders plus a win vs X or The Hall.  We are not a good basketball team right now and a loss tonight will for all intents and purposes slam the door unless we win the BEast tourney.  Absolutely must win this evening for a scintilla of hope.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 27, 2021, 12:09:32 PM
Is it better to play nova again and lose or not at all

In general, I think its better to play at Nova. It's a low risk, high reward game when it comes to tournament resume. Lose, even in blowout fashion, and the committee won't punish you (though a blowout could hurt your computer numbers). Win and you could get bumped up multiple seed lines depending on how close together teams are. Plus, a single digit loss likely helps your computer number (or at least keeps them from lowering).
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


BM1090

Quote from: SaveOD238 on January 27, 2021, 11:52:04 AM
Not with a NET in the high 70s.  I think we need to go 7-2 down the stretch at this point.

We'd get in with 6-3. Don't expect that to happen though.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

#55
Quote from: SaveOD238 on January 27, 2021, 11:52:04 AM
Not with a NET in the high 70s.  I think we need to go 7-2 down the stretch at this point.

So you're saying they leave out a 10-8 Big East team that played Marquette's schedule?  Don't see it.  But I admit I haven't really dug into NET at all this year so not sure what impact a (say) 5-4 finish (9-9 in BE assuming Nova and Gtown are not made up) would have on NET. 
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

hairy worthen

This whole thread reminds me of the Jim Mora "playoff" rant back in the day.  Playoffs? don't talk about playoffs.....

Silent Verbal

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on January 27, 2021, 01:38:47 PM
So you're saying they leave out a 10-8 Big East team that played Marquette's schedule?  Don't see it.  But I admit I haven't really dug into NET at all this year so not sure what impact a (say) 5-4 finish (9-9 in BE assuming Nova and Gtown are not made up) would have on NET.

I think you're underestimating how bad the Big East is this year, and I also think the Creighton win won't look all that impressive by season's end.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on January 27, 2021, 01:38:47 PM
So you're saying they leave out a 10-8 Big East team that played Marquette's schedule?  Don't see it.  But I admit I haven't really dug into NET at all this year so not sure what impact a (say) 5-4 finish (9-9 in BE assuming Nova and Gtown are not made up) would have on NET.

Marquette's resume is weird. 10-8 in the Big East with as tough of a schedule as they played is absolutely bid worthy...and the quadrants would agree...but they keep losing by 7-11 points at home which tanks their computer numbers (not to mention the 17 point home beatdown by Nova). MU's fate at 10-8 would largely depend on what the committee chooses to emphasize this year. If its NET, MU would be out. If its the quadrants, MU would be in. Teams in the 60s and 70s have made the NET before, I don't know if COVID would make the committee rely more or less an NET.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: Silent Verbal on January 27, 2021, 01:51:47 PM
I think you're underestimating how bad the Big East is this year, and I also think the Creighton win won't look all that impressive by season's end.

I may be.  But 68 teams make the tournament.  That's a lot, and most conferences aren't very good other than the B10 and B12. 
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: hairy worthen on January 27, 2021, 01:41:29 PM
This whole thread reminds me of the Jim Mora "playoff" rant back in the day.  Playoffs? don't talk about playoffs.....

https://twitter.com/JoeBuscaglia/status/933439575623716864

Previous topic - Next topic