collapse

Resources

Stud of Oklahoma Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Lineups - just bizarre. Would like to see the contract. by MU82
[Today at 05:26:03 PM]


No Jump Shooters by MU82
[Today at 05:24:38 PM]


C Hamilton v. Portal addition? by MU82
[Today at 05:22:28 PM]


Chances vs the Weasels? by Shooter McGavin
[Today at 05:00:37 PM]


Both Hands Tied Behind Our Back by The Sultan
[Today at 02:06:39 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Hards Alumni
[Today at 11:40:58 AM]


MU 2026-27 - Not too early by rocky_warrior
[Today at 10:36:51 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ Wisconsin

Marquette
75
Marquette @
Wisconsin
Date/Time: Dec 6, 2025, 1:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Valparaiso
72

Jay Bee

...but they won't be old either. I keep coming up with an estimated range of ~180 to 200 in the nation. I think that's fine. Creighton and Butler both fell into that range last season, but we'll be a bit unique in that our returning minutes are going to be very high combined with unusual newcomers (GSr., fourth-year RJr., two RFr., 1 21 year old true frosh).... no concerns about the "experience" age factor this coming year, but we definitely will not be 'an older, experienced team'... nor will be 'young'.

Anyone come up with very different projections?

More thoughts/numbers HERE if you're so inclined..
The portal is NOT closed.

Herman Cain

Quote from: Jay Bee on July 18, 2018, 06:33:19 PM
...but they won't be old either. I keep coming up with an estimated range of ~180 to 200 in the nation. I think that's fine. Creighton and Butler both fell into that range last season, but we'll be a bit unique in that our returning minutes are going to be very high combined with unusual newcomers (GSr., fourth-year RJr., two RFr., 1 21 year old true frosh).... no concerns about the "experience" age factor this coming year, but we definitely will not be 'an older, experienced team'... nor will be 'young'.

Anyone come up with very different projections?

More thoughts/numbers HERE if you're so inclined..
I would add our three true sophomores all played significant minutes against Big East and other quality opponents.  So the value of their experience should be given extra consideration.

I look at it this way , we have 7 guys who have proven they can compete at varying degrees of ability at the Big East level, One guy who has demonstrated competitive ability at the Big Ten level and one guy who has proven consistent competitive ability at the A-10 level. Any thing we get from the 3 freshman is icing on the cake and thus they can be put in situations that fit their skill sets. 

MU will be able to answer the bell and come out fighting against any opponent. When we get in the tough 15 round fights with Big East opponents  and some of the tough non con we have this year , our cumulative experience should be an asset.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

MU82

We'll be just right.

And we're gonna kick some arse.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Marcus92

Great article. Think everyone here is tired of hearing about how young Marquette is. Thanks for posting, JayBee.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

Previous topic - Next topic