Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Marquette vs. Missouri by MUbiz
[Today at 02:35:51 PM]


Michigan by K1 Lover
[Today at 02:10:20 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Hards Alumni
[Today at 01:42:27 PM]


Big East Non-Con Talk by Hards Alumni
[Today at 01:37:42 PM]


26-27 Miscellaneous college hoops thread by 🏀
[Today at 12:48:55 PM]


Detroit Mercy by BrewCity83
[Today at 12:11:17 PM]


Recruiting as of 6/15/26 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 12:09:14 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: wadesworld on May 06, 2017, 03:07:39 PM
Says the only guy on the board, Packers fan, Bears fan, or otherwise, who thinks the Bears needed to trade away 4 draft picks to move up 1 spot to draft a guy who started 1 year at a bad football program at a position they paid $14M to a free agent this same offseason for, despite even a guy that worked in the Bears FO and still has a number of inside contacts saying it was a horrible and unnecessary move.

And by the way, I never said it was a great trade or even a good trade.  My initial reaction was shock and disgust but I've since softened on it. 

Yes, I'm clearly in the minority on that subject as well. And that's fine. But I'm not the only person that believes the *possibility* existed.

My issue is when people speak with absolute certainty when I don't think it's possible for them to have absolute certainty, even if it's highly likely they are correct.

Previous topic - Next topic