Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 02:11:01 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by Zog from Margo
[Today at 01:30:51 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by WhiteTrash
[Today at 11:23:34 AM]


2026 Bracketology by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 10:16:30 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by 1SE
[May 16, 2025, 10:45:38 PM]


2025 Transfer Portal by TSmith34, Inc.
[May 16, 2025, 08:26:40 PM]


Pearson to MU by tower912
[May 16, 2025, 07:53:45 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

TheTulsaWarrior

I have spent a lot of years in marketing.  You always look for the unique features that you can maximize.  Marquette has NBA city, Big East/major markets and basketball first as elements that can be used effectively.  I generally agree with Chico on the advantages HE had being showcased at Marquette.

kryza

Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

keefe

Quote from: TheTulsaWarrior on April 23, 2016, 11:41:03 AM
I have spent a lot of years in marketing.  You always look for the unique features that you can maximize.  Marquette has NBA city, Big East/major markets and basketball first as elements that can be used effectively.  I generally agree with Chico on the advantages HE had being showcased at Marquette.

I agree that Marquette accrues some marginal ancillary benefit from having the Bucks in town. But that has nothing to do with the USP of Marquette Basketball.

If Marquette's value prop hinges on a notional, proximity-based association with a directionally connected affinity group then the University's investment in men's basketball has been an abysmal failure.

By your logic, UWM, Fordham, Tufts, Cleveland State, Detroit Mercy, et al would realize similar benefits.

I have listened to Dodds overhype the Bucks connection and his punctuated posts have confirmed only that he doesn't understand how vesting value in a brand should never aspire to "me too."


Death on call

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: kryza on April 23, 2016, 11:47:27 AM
Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

From a benefit within the season standpoint I agree.  The benefit to the program and Wojo for landing him and getting him to the NBA is not an inconsequential benefit in recruiting.

GGGG

There are some ancillary benefits of being in an NBA city.  Henry didn't receive any benefit from being in an NBA city.  Scouts go everywhere.  Every game is on television. 

We R Final Four

Quote from: kryza on April 23, 2016, 11:47:27 AM
Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

I just had this discussion the other day.  I agree with you, however when you get the chance to grab a McDonalds AA you do it.

Previous topic - Next topic