collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Who are we holding out most hope for yet? by Viper
[Today at 03:07:04 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 02:57:05 PM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by Hards Alumni
[Today at 02:43:38 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by muwarrior69
[Today at 02:36:30 PM]


6th Year Players - Career Games Played by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 02:02:03 PM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by panda
[Today at 01:30:42 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[December 25, 2025, 06:57:57 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Henry Sugar

Scoring is up 7% over the first weekend last season. Pace is up 5% and efficiency is up 2%.

Keep this in mind when looking at improvements for #mubb's offense (or worsening defense) over last year's raw numbers.

The full article is worth reading.

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/early_hot_take_on_new_rules
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

MuMark


tower912

I want the timeouts back.  OK with the shot clock and the defensive changes.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

brandx

My guess is that most of the scoring increase is due to the new officiating rules rather than the shot clock. As the article says, there are about 4 more fouls per game being called on average than last year.

GooooMarquette

Quote from: tower912 on November 16, 2015, 05:00:28 PM
I want the timeouts back.  OK with the shot clock and the defensive changes.

I actually think that's the best of the changes.  So often, coaches would save them all (except the use-it or lose-it in the first half) until the final two minutes...and turn the finish into a slow, painful death.

tower912

IMO, one more timeout and we beat Belmont.  If Wojo had a timeout in his pocket during the last minute I think the outcome is different.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

GooooMarquette

Quote from: tower912 on November 16, 2015, 05:41:16 PM
IMO, one more timeout and we beat Belmont.  If Wojo had a timeout in his pocket during the last minute I think the outcome is different.

Perhaps, but it could just as often go the other way.  On balance, I like the idea that coaches have one less timeout to hold for the end.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: tower912 on November 16, 2015, 05:41:16 PM
IMO, one more timeout and we beat Belmont.  If Wojo had a timeout in his pocket during the last minute I think the outcome is different.

It's not like Wojo wasn't told ahead of time about the change - he could have saved a TO.

MU82

"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

mileskishnish72


Spotcheck Billy

This could hurt the Warriors:

2. More 3's are being shot

So far this season, 36.3% of field goal attempts have been 3-pointers. If it held up, that number would easily surpass the current record of 34.4% set in the 2007-08 season. Typically, there isn't much of a season-long trend in 3-point attempts. The full-season numbers tend to be close to what you see the first weekend. Given that we are so far above the long-term norms, it's reasonable to expect this number to drop a bit, if anything. But even with a small correction, it appears this will be the Year of the 3. Is this because more teams are having to rush 3's late in the shot clock? It doesn't seem that way, because...


bradley center bat

Quote from: GooooMarquette on November 16, 2015, 05:34:35 PM
I actually think that's the best of the changes.  So often, coaches would save them all (except the use-it or lose-it in the first half) until the final two minutes...and turn the finish into a slow, painful death.
I LOVE that a team timeout 30 seconds within a media timout, turns into a full media timeout. Then the next dead ball, we don't get that media timeout.

WarriorInNYC

Quote from: brandx on November 16, 2015, 05:07:05 PM
My guess is that most of the scoring increase is due to the new officiating rules rather than the shot clock. As the article says, there are about 4 more fouls per game being called on average than last year.

I haven't read the article at all yet, and I understand that the rule changes lead to more fouls per game.  But how much of the 4 more fouls per game is due to increased possessions?  Increased possessions alone should lead to an increase in fouls.

Previous topic - Next topic