collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

We're 3rd best! by PointWarrior
[Today at 04:40:58 PM]


Shaka Smart 02/18/2026 by wadesworld
[Today at 04:34:47 PM]


Transfers in/out 2025-2026 by Small Orange Soda
[Today at 03:36:32 PM]


Georgetown game roll call 2026 by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 02:36:03 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Mu8891
[Today at 11:40:08 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[Today at 11:02:11 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 12:58:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  @ Georgetown

Marquette
70
Marquette @
Georgetown
Date/Time: Feb 24, 2026, 6:00pm
TV: NBC SN
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
76

Tugg Speedman

This week's SI cover was modeled after the Larry Bird 1977 cover.



The implication is "McBuckets" is this good.  Is he?

Why does Christian Lattner, Danny Ferry, Keith Van Horn, Tyler Hansborough, JJ Reddick, Adam Morrison, Andrew Bogut, and Jimmer Ferdette come to mind?  These "traditionals" were just as heralded as McBuckets and none of which were as good as Larry Bird at the next level.  Why is McBuckets different?

MUSF

Are you asking if Doug McDermott is as good as Larry Bird?

Uhhh, no.

ChicosBailBonds

Why are you calling them traditionals?

oldwarrior81

more importantly, here's the link to the Al McGuire interview noted on the Larry Bird cover.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1093067/index.htm


warriorchick

Um, maybe because they thought this cover would sell magazines.
Have some patience, FFS.

rocket surgeon

high school and college level players could learn a lot by watching mcdermott and how he moves without the ball.  the instincts and shooting you can't teach.  we can't spring jake for 5 good shots a game due to defensive pressure.  buckets is a guy that teams focus on game in and game out and he still scores 30.  i understand he's 6'7", but still...
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

MUSF

Quote from: rocket surgeon on March 16, 2014, 01:17:57 PM
high school and college level players could learn a lot by watching mcdermott and how he moves without the ball.  the instincts and shooting you can't teach.  we can't spring jake for 5 good shots a game due to defensive pressure.  buckets is a guy that teams focus on game in and game out and he still scores 30.  i understand he's 6'7", but still...

You are way underselling the fact that he is a mismatch for almost anyone guarding him. I don't care how much Jake moves around, he will never have that advantage.

You are correct though, McDermott is a really smart player that always seems to find a way to exploit any opportunity the opposing D gives him.

THRILLHO

Quote from: Heisenberg on March 16, 2014, 12:23:22 PM


The implication is "McBuckets" is this good.  Is he?

Why does Christian Lattner, Danny Ferry, Keith Van Horn, Tyler Hansborough, JJ Reddick, Adam Morrison, Andrew Bogut, and Jimmer Ferdette come to mind?  These "traditionals" were just as heralded as McBuckets and none of which were as good as Larry Bird at the next level.  Why is McBuckets different?

Dont forget what i think might be the best actual comparison: Wally Sczerbiak!

MU82

Quote from: THRILLHO on March 16, 2014, 01:58:54 PM
Dont forget what i think might be the best actual comparison: Wally Sczerbiak!


Sczerbiak is a good comparison. Also, to try to get away from the traditional thing, I was thinking McDermott is Glen Rice-ish.

I think people forget sometimes how much more Bird did than shoot. He was not just a good rebounder and passer; he was a great rebounder and an astounding passer.

Just as there hasn't really been a "next Michael Jordan," there truly hasn't been a "next Larry Bird." Durant is close, but he's not the all-around player Bird was. I say this as a guy who grew up hating the Celtics!
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Tugg Speedman

The traditional thing is because SI reached back 37 years ago to recreate the Larry Bird cover.  They did not look to recreate a Glen Rice or Kevin Durant cover.

Atticus


downtown85

Quote from: oldwarrior81 on March 16, 2014, 12:35:14 PM
more importantly, here's the link to the Al McGuire interview noted on the Larry Bird cover.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1093067/index.htm

Wow. thanks for sharing.  great read! 

ChitownSpaceForRent


connie

"I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked."  H.J.S.

barfolomew

Good thing they didn't do that cover with Cleanthony Early.
Who knows what gesture those Wichita State cheerleaders would have been using...
Relationes Incrementum Victoria

RushmoreAcademy

Quote from: warriorchick on March 16, 2014, 01:08:48 PM
Um, maybe because they thought this cover would sell magazines.

And 1!!!

4everwarriors

Spaceship croaker is correct. McDermott is fantastic and will translate to the pro game. Definite lottery pick. Looks like a Celtic for sure, a'ina?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

towncryer

He's a defensive liability and he does...how do I put this...exaggerate contact that he encounters...but with that said, he's a great player.  It's already been nailed on the head...his movement without the ball is his biggest weapon. 

He's not as good as Larry, though. 

Previous topic - Next topic