collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by JTJ3
[Today at 03:31:05 PM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Nukem2
[Today at 01:21:14 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:16:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 01:36:32 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by BCHoopster
[July 09, 2025, 10:13:46 PM]


Kam update by MuggsyB
[July 09, 2025, 02:51:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

LAZER

Haven't seen this anywhere else.  I guess I would take MU w/ the pts, but not very confidently.

We R Final Four

Not enough points to take MU in this one.

wardle2wade

Agree.  I expected it to be Creighton -5 or -5.5... the good news with the current spread means that the betting public likes MU more than I thought they would.  That's not typical.

Windyplayer

Quote from: wardle2wade on February 19, 2014, 02:23:44 PM
Agree.  I expected it to be Creighton -5 or -5.5... the good news with the current spread means that the betting public likes MU more than I thought they would.  That's not typical.
The public knows how we do in late February/March.

79Warrior

Quote from: LAZER on February 19, 2014, 09:59:47 AM
Haven't seen this anywhere else.  I guess I would take MU w/ the pts, but not very confidently.

MU is playing with their backs against the wall, in need of a signature win and playing at home. I like MU in this one and would take the three points.

bradley center bat

When was the last time, MU was a home dog?

LAZER


wardle2wade

Quote from: bradley center bat on February 19, 2014, 02:54:50 PM
When was the last time, MU was a home dog?

Villanova?  I seem to remember Nova favored by 2, but I could be wrong.

wadesworld

Wish I would've seen this earlier.  This would've been easy money.  -3?  We lost by like 18 to them at Creighton.  This is as bad of a matchup as we can face.  A team that can score.  It doesn't matter how bad they are defensively, we don't score the basketball anyways.  Gardner will never be effective against a team that plays this time of system.  He'll either be busy giving up 30 trying to defend the perimeter or he'll be on the bench.  If Gardner isn't going, we rarely go.  Just way too easy of money there.

We R Final Four

Great analysis on a game that is already over. I think that you have to bet on the game BEFORE it happens. Commenting on what has already happened???? Now that is good work.

wadesworld

Quote from: We R Final Four on February 19, 2014, 09:57:49 PM
Great analysis on a game that is already over. I think that you have to bet on the game BEFORE it happens. Commenting on what has already happened???? Now that is good work.

Well I did text 2 of my friends yesterday afternoon and asked if we lost by more or less than 12. They both said less. I said more. So hey, thanks! Once again, that would've been easy money. An awful matchup. We could play them 10 more times and we would lose by double digits every time.

willie warrior

Quote from: wadesworld on February 19, 2014, 09:05:07 PM
Wish I would've seen this earlier.  This would've been easy money.  -3?  We lost by like 18 to them at Creighton.  This is as bad of a matchup as we can face.  A team that can score.  It doesn't matter how bad they are defensively, we don't score the basketball anyways.  Gardner will never be effective against a team that plays this time of system.  He'll either be busy giving up 30 trying to defend the perimeter or he'll be on the bench.  If Gardner isn't going, we rarely go.  Just way too easy of money there.
Once again--this is not Gardner's fault. When their defense is packed in because there is no respect for a PG who is not even defended dribbling at the FT line, how the hell can you put this on Gardner? And Gardner did not give up 30, he played pretty good D on the perimeter. There is no secret to defending us. Put a guy on Jake, leave Wilson to dribble it around, let Jamil jack up 3's and pack it in. We will need an effective PG next year. What Buzz keeps rolling out there is not going to get it done against the good teams.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

We R Final Four

Some people put their money where their mouth is, some people just talk about it after the fact, I guess.

CTWarrior

Not a gambling man but if I were I would have stayed away from this game.  I thought it was going to go to the wire.  I think I'd take Creighton next time if we were getting 12.
Calvin:  I'm a genius.  But I'm a misunderstood genius. 
Hobbes:  What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin:  Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

wadesworld

Quote from: willie warrior on February 20, 2014, 06:59:01 AM
Once again--this is not Gardner's fault. When their defense is packed in because there is no respect for a PG who is not even defended dribbling at the FT line, how the hell can you put this on Gardner? And Gardner did not give up 30, he played pretty good D on the perimeter. There is no secret to defending us. Put a guy on Jake, leave Wilson to dribble it around, let Jamil jack up 3's and pack it in. We will need an effective PG next year. What Buzz keeps rolling out there is not going to get it done against the good teams.

Not saying the loss is on Gardner.  Saying when a team pulls Gardner to the perimeter it does not bode well for us at all.  Wragge had 12 points in the first 8 minutes of the game and Gardner didn't play a whole lot after that point.  When Gardner is not scoring for us, we are not going to win.  It is a horrible matchup for us all around.

Previous topic - Next topic