collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

WarriorInNYC

Article on players that are "Battier-like", doesn't specifically mention Marquette, but Jimmy and Wes made the list and Jae made the "More Intriguing But Unknown Young Guys" list.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9225802/players-shane-battier-harder-find-conventional-wisdom-suggests

LAMUfan

Was just about to post this, so basically they are talking about defensive switchables who can shoot.  Makes since that some MU players would be on the list.  I think J Wilson could fit into this category in the future as well if he pans out nicely. 

Canned Goods n Ammo

If you are above 6'6", you can defend, and you can shoot the corner 3, there is a spot for you in the league.


willie warrior

Quote from: Guns n Ammo on April 30, 2013, 01:07:58 PM
If you are above 6'6", you can defend, and you can shoot the corner 3, there is a spot for you in the league.


How about if you are 5'9", a la Nate Robinson?
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Rockmic87


MU82

Quote from: LAMUfan on April 30, 2013, 12:38:07 PM
Was just about to post this, so basically they are talking about defensive switchables who can shoot.  Makes since that some MU players would be on the list.  I think J Wilson could fit into this category in the future as well if he pans out nicely. 

Jimmy was a great defender who turned himself into a better shooter. Wes was a good defender who showed he could shoot when given more of an opportunity. Jamil is a skilled but inconsistent offensive player who is a mediocre (at best) on-ball defender. It will be interesting to see if he can improve enough to deserve to be mentioned with Jimmy and Wes.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

LAMUfan

yes that is what I was trying to say without quite the emphasis.  IF he pans out, he has some potential as this type of player in the league.

Bricky

#7
Edit--

I didn't notice that this was already a topic. Mods feel free to delete.

--









Reading Grantland today, I came across an article about the new desired NBA role player. The article shows love to Jimmy Buckets, Wes Matthews and Jae Crowder as the future.

Looks like Buzz's preferred style of player has a pretty big future.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9225802/players-shane-battier-harder-find-conventional-wisdom-suggests

LloydMooresLegs

Nice article.  Every day, Zach Lowe is revolutionizing writing about basketball on the national level.  He is outstanding.

Jamil could fit into the same slot.

Sunbelt15

Quote from: Guns n Ammo on April 30, 2013, 01:07:58 PM
If you are above 6'6", you can defend, and you can shoot the corner 3, there is a spot for you in the league.



Boom

Dawson Rental

Well, Vander won't fit into this club at this point due to his outside shooting deficiencies, and maybe he never will due to his (lack of) height.  Not being projected for that kind of role makes it tougher for Vander to get drafted.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Previous topic - Next topic