collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

A question for the Scoop elders by MU82
[Today at 12:37:52 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:06:45 AM]


Ross Not Start? by MuggsyB
[December 21, 2025, 11:32:54 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by mileskishnish72
[December 21, 2025, 11:05:45 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jables1604
[December 21, 2025, 06:52:56 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[December 21, 2025, 06:30:05 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[December 21, 2025, 06:25:38 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

PaintTouchesSays

Player Grades: Marquette vs DePaul
      


Written by: Andrei Greska
            


Vander Blue (18 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast) You can tell Blue has taken it to the next level when he has a quiet game and still scores 18. Vander had one nice pull-up jumper in the first but did ... Continue reading →


            

http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/
      

BM1090

Thanks.

Just fyi there is no blurb on Jamil and Mayo had more than three points.

PaintTouches


wadesworld

I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

AZWarrior

#4
Quote from: wadesworld on February 09, 2013, 04:24:48 PM
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11?  I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.

One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?  You're a tough grader.
All this talk of rights.  So little talk of responsibilities.

wadesworld

Quote from: AZWarrior on February 09, 2013, 04:29:16 PM
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.

C-, eh?You're a tough grader.

Our defense absolutely should have been better.  There is no doubt about that.  The offensive numbers were great, but so is every teams' who plays DePaul.

Nukem2

The grades should have been much lower given that no one played defense.

Previous topic - Next topic