collapse

Resources

Stud of DePaul Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Fun Facts re: DePaul game by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 02:46:47 PM]


Phillips vs. Militic by The Sultan
[Today at 02:42:43 PM]


When will the pain end? by Newsdreams
[Today at 01:00:57 PM]


Tiny bright spot by willie warrior
[Today at 12:45:20 PM]


Marquette will be a tourney team next season by willie warrior
[Today at 12:38:34 PM]


Coaches Culpable? by willie warrior
[Today at 12:35:57 PM]


I've changed my mind by MU82
[Today at 10:58:03 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  @ Providence

Marquette
51
Marquette @
Providence
Date/Time: Mar 4, 2026, 6:00pm
TV: Peacock / NBC SN(?)
Schedule for 2025-26
DePaul
62

bilsu

Quote from: MUMac on September 11, 2011, 08:14:06 PM
I am guessing you are either alone on this Island or there are very few along with you.  It sure seemed pretty obvious that it was a sarcastic article.  I guess the writer could have written it in teal for you.

The article looked like it came right from The Onion.
It is the title that makes me think it is not being sarcastic, Reading the article alone does not do anything to me. The title of the article labels her a moron. If he was being sarcastic, maybe he should of referred to board members as moron's instead of the questioner.  I will admit I often miss sarcasism. I tend to read things literally and I am not in the habit of guessing who is saying what they mean and who is trying to be funny. Often to recognize sarcasm, you have to know the writer's personality, and I do not know the writers on this board. Since I do not know the writers, I genrally do not look at the posters names.

MUMac

Quote from: bilsu on September 12, 2011, 07:14:07 AM
It is the title that makes me think it is not being sarcastic, Reading the article alone does not do anything to me. The title of the article labels her a moron. If he was being sarcastic, maybe he should of referred to board members as moron's instead of the questioner.  I will admit I often miss sarcasism. I tend to read things literally and I am not in the habit of guessing who is saying what they mean and who is trying to be funny. Often to recognize sarcasm, you have to know the writer's personality, and I do not know the writers on this board. Since I do not know the writers, I genrally do not look at the posters names.

To understand and appreciate sarcasm, it often begins with the title.  The ending gave it away, if nothing else.  Awkward silence after admitting no one thought it through, ending with chants of "SEC, SEC ..."

brewcity77

Quote from: MUMac on September 12, 2011, 08:10:16 AM
To understand and appreciate sarcasm, it often begins with the title.  The ending gave it away, if nothing else.  Awkward silence after admitting no one thought it through, ending with chants of "SEC, SEC ..."

Yeah, if the chants of "SEC" don't give it away, I don't know what possibly could. Maybe had the writer put the whole thing in teal?

Previous topic - Next topic