collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Is there reason to believe MU will be better in '26-27? by Warrior of Law
[Today at 03:06:50 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 03:03:32 PM]


Nigel James - Next Season by Galway Eagle
[Today at 02:58:23 PM]


MU/ St.John’s game thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 02:56:35 PM]


What Will the Future of Shaka's Culture Look Like? by Markusquette
[Today at 02:44:35 PM]


157 minutes by Pakuni
[Today at 02:09:17 PM]


Portal by MU82
[Today at 02:07:57 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ DePaul

Marquette
68
Marquette @
DePaul
Date/Time: Jan 17, 2026, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
92

Skatastrophy

http://www.teamspeedkills.com/2011/4/8/2098729/ncaa-bars-schools-from-subscribing-to-rivals

"The rationale "is that Rivals provides video of nonscholastic competition that is not available to the general public."

GGGG

Fiddling while Rome burns.

Seriously, this is typical NCAA.  They have issues with scouting services directing players to specific institutions, but instead they simply ban all Rivals subscriptions?  This is going to hurt the small schools way more than the big ones. 

Pakuni

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on April 08, 2011, 01:07:04 PM
Fiddling while Rome burns.

Seriously, this is typical NCAA.  They have issues with scouting services directing players to specific institutions, but instead they simply ban all Rivals subscriptions?  This is going to hurt the small schools way more than the big ones. 

1. I sincerely hope that schools - small and large - aren't basing their recruiting decisions on videos posted by Rivals.
2. I'd guess that anything Rivals has on its sites - or comparable videos - are accessible through high school coaches/athletic departments. A little more difficult to obtain, but not unobtainable.

I think you're right that it's a silly and trivial matter, given everything else on the NCAA's plate, but I don't see it as a much of a big deal either way. Besides, it's an entirely unenforceable regulation. I suspect Rivals won't be eager to share their subscriber list with the NCAA and the NCAA won't be spending its time tracking down the browser histories of every athletic department employee.

Skatastrophy

Rivals should just change their name to circumvent the rule.  Problem solved.

Tugg Speedman

Quote from: Pakuni on April 08, 2011, 01:23:13 PM
1. I sincerely hope that schools - small and large - aren't basing their recruiting decisions on videos posted by Rivals.
2. I'd guess that anything Rivals has on its sites - or comparable videos - are accessible through high school coaches/athletic departments. A little more difficult to obtain, but not unobtainable

This is more a football issue.  With 100 schollies ad 300 schools ... yes they offer based on videos. 

Basketball with only 13 kids total, averaging maybe 4 a year, they do look at them personally.

And I agree it really hurts D1AA footballs schools that have 25 spots a year to fill and rely on videos to find players.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: Skatastrophy on April 08, 2011, 01:26:09 PM
Rivals should just change their name to circumvent the rule.  Problem solved.

Or they can just use Google and see the exact same videos...maybe the NCAA should just ban breathing?

Pakuni

Quote from: AnotherMU84 on April 08, 2011, 01:34:05 PM
This is more a football issue.  With 100 schollies ad 300 schools ... yes they offer based on videos. 

Basketball with only 13 kids total, averaging maybe 4 a year, they do look at them personally.

And I agree it really hurts D1AA footballs schools that have 25 spots a year to fill and rely on videos to find players.

Actually, I-AA teams only have about 16 scholarships to give a year (or 63 in all) and I find it unlikely that they rely on Rivals videos to find players. I've had friends and family recruited to play in D-II and D-III and in every instance a coach came to see them in person and/or contacted their high school coaches/athletic departments about him. A coach who makes recruiting decisions based on what he sees on Rivals is lazy and likely soon to be unemplyed.

reinko

04/08/2016:  PRESS RELEASE from the NCAA

It has come to our attention, this thing called Twitter exists, and that coaches and recruits may be using it.  Coaches and recruits may no longer twat each other.

Regards,
The NCAA

Tugg Speedman

Quote from: Pakuni on April 08, 2011, 01:52:16 PM
Actually, I-AA teams only have about 16 scholarships to give a year (or 63 in all) and I find it unlikely that they rely on Rivals videos to find players. I've had friends and family recruited to play in D-II and D-III and in every instance a coach came to see them in person and/or contacted their high school coaches/athletic departments about him. A coach who makes recruiting decisions based on what he sees on Rivals is lazy and likely soon to be unemployed.

I know a D1 football player at a B12 school.  He sent videos and Rivals links to assistant football coaches at various B12 schools.  This videos were instrumental in getting his schollie.

Yes, they will look at you before they offer.  The videos get you a look.  Without them, how does a kid from Chicago get an offer from Colorado?  How does that Colorado O-line coach decide if worth a plane trip to Chicago?

Answer: Rivals videos


HouWarrior

Quote from: reinko on April 08, 2011, 02:02:33 PM
04/08/2016:  PRESS RELEASE from the NCAA

It has come to our attention, this thing called Twitter exists, and that coaches and recruits may be using it.  Coaches and recruits may no longer twat each other.

Regards,
The NCAA
Very good. lol

I thought twat is a noun,  meaning...well ...a part of the anatomy, and not a verb.
Of course one who twitters a lot is a twit, as:

Twit may refer to:

Idiot, a mentally deficient or self-defeating person.

...and one who relys on twitter for his/her facts and news is likely a... well.. twat
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Pakuni

Quote from: AnotherMU84 on April 08, 2011, 02:21:21 PM
I know a D1 football player at a B12 school.  He sent videos and Rivals links to assistant football coaches at various B12 schools.  This videos were instrumental in getting his schollie.

Yes, they will look at you before they offer.  The videos get you a look.  Without them, how does a kid from Chicago get an offer from Colorado?  How does that Colorado O-line coach decide if worth a plane trip to Chicago?

Answer: Rivals videos



Are you serious?
OK, fine ... before the advent of Rivals, no kid ever was recruited to play outside his home state. After all, how could a school in South Florida find a quarterback recruit from, say, Ohio, like Bernie Kosar? And how could a school in Nebraska know anything about a kid in California, like Lawrence Phillips, or a kid in Florida, like Tommie Frazier? Or how could a school in Wisconsin know anything about a Ron Dayne-type running back from New Jersey?
Oh, and Colorado somehow recruited guys like Kordell Stewart and Eric Bienemy (Louisiana), Michael Westbrook (Michigan), Rae Carruth, Chad Brown, Ted Johnson, Rashaan Salaam and Charles Johnson (California) and Mike Pritchard (South Carolina) in the pre-Rivals days.

rocky_warrior

#11
Quote from: Pakuni on April 08, 2011, 03:00:00 PM
Oh, and Colorado somehow recruited guys like Kordell Stewart and Eric Bienemy (Louisiana), Michael Westbrook (Michigan), Rae Carruth, Chad Brown, Ted Johnson, Rashaan Salaam and Charles Johnson (California) and Mike Pritchard (South Carolina) in the pre-Rivals days.

Wasn't that when Colorado still hired strippers for their recruits though?  ;)

edit: Oh, I just noticed most of the players you listed were before that...

SaintPaulWarrior

#12
Quote from: rocky_warrior on April 08, 2011, 04:44:29 PM
Wasn't that when Colorado still hired strippers for their recruits though?  ;)

And the coach's daughter having the QB's baby?

Pakuni

Quote from: rocky_warrior on April 08, 2011, 04:44:29 PM
Wasn't that when Colorado still hired strippers for their recruits though?  ;)

You make it sound like they stopped.

Previous topic - Next topic