Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

IU vs MU preview by Uncle Rico
[Today at 04:55:19 PM]


Media Rights Update by StillAWarrior
[Today at 01:55:39 PM]


More conference realignment talk by The Sultan
[Today at 08:26:22 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[July 07, 2025, 11:14:59 PM]


To the Rafters by sodakmu87
[July 07, 2025, 09:29:49 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by brewcity77
[July 07, 2025, 02:10:17 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[July 07, 2025, 11:51:18 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6037857

jeez. maybe i dont understand enough about the culture down there, but i can't believe that there are enough people to watch a 24 hour network based on ONE university that will keep it financially viable.

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: socrplar125 on January 19, 2011, 03:05:16 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6037857

jeez. maybe i dont understand enough about the culture down there, but i can't believe that there are enough people to watch a 24 hour network based on ONE university that will keep it financially viable.

Doesn't matter, ESPN is fronting the money which means the MSO's (Dish Network, Comcast, Directv, Charter, Time Warner) will have their rates raised again by ESPN which in turn means that you, the customer, will pay more to pay for this channel.

ESPN is about to pay the NFL $1.8 to $1.9 billion PER YEAR for their Monday Night Football rights...the customer will be paying for that ultimately as well.

WarriorHal

Wow...they should call it the Bevo Network.

warrior_rugby15

If I remember correctly, the reason why is because the Big 12 promised Texas that they would get their own TV network, which would increase Texas' revenue by at least 10+ million.

GGGG

My Aggie friend with connections tells me that this gives A&M the cover it needs to bolt to the SEC if they so desire.

M@RQUETTEW@RRIORS

I lived in texas DFW for a while.  They will have plenty of eyeballs.  This is why Texas NEVER had any real interest in the Big Ten.  It was just to get leverage for their own network.  They have been talking about this for a while down there.

HouWarrior

Quote from: socrplar125 on January 19, 2011, 03:05:16 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6037857

jeez. maybe i dont understand enough about the culture down there, but i can't believe that there are enough people to watch a 24 hour network based on ONE university that will keep it financially viable.
You surely said this knowing 25 million people live "down there" in Texas, and that UT is the dominant university in the big 12;number one in Texas.

The TV markets and advertising revenue potential far exceed ND, and compare favorably with all other team/league channels already established. Financial viability and UT are synonymous. By gross $ and football profitability its no.1, as a stand alone program, in USA.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

77ncaachamps

SS Marquette

Coleman

So when's Marquette getting one?

Previous topic - Next topic