MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 06:06:06 PM

Title: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 06:06:06 PM
Go Catholic Schools!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: We R Final Four on March 22, 2018, 06:19:14 PM
Go Jesuit Schools!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 22, 2018, 06:56:46 PM
Man is Loyola fun to watch
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MomofMUltiples on March 22, 2018, 06:58:27 PM
Nevada guy tried to do “the Thing” and whiffed.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: We R Final Four on March 22, 2018, 07:05:33 PM
Chris Weber>>>>>>>>>>>Cheryl Miller.
Man, I just can’t listen to Cheryl.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Nukem2 on March 22, 2018, 07:11:12 PM
MI toasting TAMU.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: LloydsLegs on March 22, 2018, 07:11:58 PM
Ramblers can do this.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Otule's Glass Eye on March 22, 2018, 07:21:29 PM
Couldn’t believe that Texas A&M team blew out UNC and it’s even harder to believe now
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 07:23:55 PM
Nevada down 10.  Officially dangerous now.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: LloydsLegs on March 22, 2018, 07:30:34 PM
Nevada down 10.  Officially dangerous now.
:)
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 07:38:35 PM
Loyola is 10-10 shooting this half.  Only up 9 with Nevada about to shoot 3 free throws.  Nevada has them where they want them.  Apprehensive for Loyola.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 22, 2018, 07:40:30 PM
MU out placed Michigan in Maui.  For such an average experienced team with well-below average height, Loyola sure can play great defense.

If by the grace of god...
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 22, 2018, 07:49:39 PM
MU out placed Michigan in Maui.  For such an average experienced team with well-below average height, Loyola sure can play great defense.

If by the grace of god...

Average experience? They start 2 seniors, 2 redshirt juniors (so seniors), and thier best bench player is a senior
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 22, 2018, 07:52:40 PM
If Nova wins, and Michigan loses before the final 4, I will win 700+.

Tx A&M is not helping my cause.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Lighthouse 84 on March 22, 2018, 07:53:18 PM
Gotta love a Marquette Warriors reference during the Loyola game.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Otule's Glass Eye on March 22, 2018, 07:54:16 PM
Cool stat shown on CBS, Nevada is trying to become the 5th team to win their first 3 tournament games after trailing at half time. Marquette and Al in 1977 were the first team to do so.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 22, 2018, 07:55:55 PM
Average experience? They start 2 seniors, 2 redshirt juniors (so seniors), and thier best bench player is a senior

Rank 144 on Pomeroy. 1.80 years versus NCAA average of 1.70.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 22, 2018, 07:59:09 PM
Rank 144 on Pomeroy. 1.80 years versus NCAA average of 1.70.

I know that's where you got it from. But 5 of their top 6 players are 22 years old with 4 years of college ball under their belts.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 22, 2018, 08:06:34 PM
Wow Loyola hahahaha
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 08:07:03 PM
Sister Jean!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 22, 2018, 08:10:18 PM
Awesome game. Go Loyola!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 08:11:12 PM
Hey, Chris Webber , how many time outs left?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 22, 2018, 08:11:42 PM
Dude is holding his knee and they're talking about a travel...
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 22, 2018, 08:12:34 PM
Great story. Fun team. Fire up the ice cream truck for Custer
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 08:13:56 PM
It was a travel.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: real chili 83 on March 22, 2018, 08:18:58 PM
What happened to the Tennessee moron who posted about Sr Jean?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MomofMUltiples on March 22, 2018, 08:19:55 PM
It was a travel.

Not convinced that the Nevada player didn’t foul before the travel.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 22, 2018, 08:21:23 PM
Moot.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: warriorchick on March 22, 2018, 08:52:30 PM
What happened to the Tennessee moron who posted about Sr Jean?

Tweet was deleted.  That's about it.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 22, 2018, 08:53:28 PM
https://twitter.com/MattNorlander/status/976971772707958784?s=19

Can we play offense like this next year?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: LloydsLegs on March 22, 2018, 09:38:12 PM
I can’t see KSt finishing this, but that would be sooooooo great for LU.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: nyg on March 22, 2018, 09:47:47 PM
I can’t see KSt finishing this, but that would be sooooooo great for LU.

The walk on’s may play if this continues.  For all the ref haters out there, don’t watch this game.

26 total fouls in first half.  KSU has 16 and three guys have three fouls apiece. Kentucky has gone to the line 23 times. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 22, 2018, 09:49:44 PM
The walk on’s may play if this continues.  For all the ref haters out there, don’t watch this game.

26 total fouls in first half.  KSU has 16 and three guys have three fouls apiece. Kentucky has gone to the line 23 times. 

I guess this is what the NCAA wants????
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 22, 2018, 10:48:44 PM
This game is unwatchable. Whistles every god damn possession. Eff the NCAA rules committee.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on March 22, 2018, 11:00:55 PM
This game is unwatchable. Whistles every god damn possession. Eff NCAA rules committee.

+1000
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 22, 2018, 11:03:39 PM
For Loyola's sake I really hope K-State pulls this out.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 22, 2018, 11:10:15 PM
God loves the Ramblers. Or maybe because the pope is Jesuit.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on March 22, 2018, 11:11:09 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CI1jWvGWgAAItHc.jpg)
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 22, 2018, 11:12:00 PM
One of Loyola or Kansas St will be in the Final Four. Crazy!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 22, 2018, 11:12:49 PM
One of Loyola or Kansas St will be in the Final Four. Crazy!

Loyola or Bruce Webber. What are Illini fans thinking tonight?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 22, 2018, 11:16:18 PM
One of Loyola or Kansas St will be in the Final Four. Crazy!

Incredible.  And it looks like FSU might be within a game too.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GB Warrior on March 22, 2018, 11:38:58 PM
Famous last words, I know, but the right side of the bracket is going to obliterate the left side
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 23, 2018, 01:19:42 AM
I know that's where you got it from. But 5 of their top 6 players are 22 years old with 4 years of college ball under their belts.

Here's the difference:  Moser has his team playing Majerus defense. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Eldon on March 23, 2018, 09:20:00 AM
Here's the difference:  Moser has his team playing Majerus defense.

Ad Majerus Defense Gloriam
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 07:08:46 PM
Really surprised that Nova is struggling this much to beat the WVA press.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: peterpan on March 23, 2018, 07:10:26 PM
Really surprised that Nova is struggling this much to beat the WVA press.

Gillespie is so bad wow
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Johnny B on March 23, 2018, 07:15:08 PM
Unreal how half the nova guys have to sit out the whole half with fouls
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: patso on March 23, 2018, 07:22:53 PM
Huggins is as fat as Ewing. Following in the Majerus school of coaching
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: dw3dw3dw3 on March 23, 2018, 07:38:46 PM
Maybe I'm a little pessimistic from the season still, but it feels like MU is a long way from seriously competing in a game like WV/Nova. Not we could win one in every 5 tries, but favored or at least a pickem in a game like this.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Daniel on March 23, 2018, 08:03:19 PM
Wow. You look at the defense that West Virginia plays. Omg. Smothering Villanova on every possession. Wow.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 23, 2018, 08:04:47 PM
Wow. You look at the defense that West Virginia plays. Omg. Smothering Villanova on every possession. Wow.

Smothering. Fouling. Same thing

What happened to "2 hands on an offensive player is a foul"?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 23, 2018, 08:07:42 PM
Huggins teams have not changed over the years.  Physical as hell.  Deep.  When they have enough shooting, they are tough.  Same stuff he did at Cinci.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 08:17:46 PM
If Novas gonna win this, it'll be at the line
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 23, 2018, 08:21:16 PM
If Novas gonna win this, it'll be at the line

Somewhere in MN, JB just got angry
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 08:21:39 PM
Huge run for Nova!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 23, 2018, 08:22:53 PM
Huge run for Nova!

Great run.  Hope they can control the stretch.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GB Warrior on March 23, 2018, 08:23:27 PM
Don't mess with 2nd half nova.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: patso on March 23, 2018, 08:29:56 PM
We should have recruited Devincenzo
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 08:31:44 PM
Nova went from comatose to en fuego!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 23, 2018, 08:34:40 PM
Incredible dunks and blocks in this game.

Any chance Theo can provide those moments consistently by his senior year?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 08:35:04 PM
Somewhere in MN, JB just got angry
Not trying to imply that fts matta, but when your in the double bonus with 10 minutes left you should be attacking
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 23, 2018, 08:36:29 PM
Not trying to imply that fts matta, but when your in the double bonus with 10 minutes left you should be attacking

I’m just kidding
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 08:40:29 PM
I’m just kidding
I got what you were saying 😁

Nova didn't even need fts, further advancing JBs stats, pulled away with their jump shooting.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Mr. Nielsen on March 23, 2018, 08:45:16 PM
I miss the Huggy vs MU games.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 08:51:16 PM
I like how the best way to break the press has been throw the ball up to Bridges and no one can jump higher than him.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 23, 2018, 09:00:15 PM
I like how the best way to break the press has been throw the ball up to Bridges and no one can jump higher than him.
Jim McIlvane Kentucky flashback.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 23, 2018, 09:38:30 PM
Duke v Syracuse is basically unwatchable.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: naginiF on March 23, 2018, 09:49:08 PM
I miss the Huggy vs MU games.
Back when we played his teams, either Cinci or WV, I thought his teams had great determination and skill.  That combination overcame the fact that Huggy is basically a human stain.  This WV team had all the determination of past teams but tried to make up for the lack of shooting skill with juvenile intimidation BS.

I don't miss playing Huggy at all
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 23, 2018, 09:53:04 PM
I miss drinking with Huggy at Turners.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 23, 2018, 09:56:23 PM
Purdue v Texas Tech. Even more unwatchable.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 23, 2018, 09:57:52 PM
Lovers of defense are enjoying it.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 23, 2018, 10:09:26 PM
Lovers of defense are enjoying it.

Yes we are enjoying seeing all these defensive teams in the S16. It takes a great offense to win it, but in a crapshoot, a great defense brings you luck.

Thank god it's Lent.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: fjm on March 23, 2018, 10:22:20 PM
Maybe I'm a little pessimistic from the season still, but it feels like MU is a long way from seriously competing in a game like WV/Nova. Not we could win one in every 5 tries, but favored or at least a pickem in a game like this.

Agreed. But I can see MU competing with Nevada, Kansas State, Loyola, Cuse.

In the tourney it's just as much about luck
Of the draw as it is about skill and depth etc...
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 10:23:46 PM
Is it just my imagination or has Grayson Allen been at Duke for like 10 years?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 10:24:19 PM
Agreed. But I can see MU competing with Nevada, Kansas State, Loyola, Cuse.

In the tourney it's just as much about luck
Of the draw as it is about skill and depth etc...

#crapshoot
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Its DJOver on March 23, 2018, 10:25:11 PM
Is it just my imagination or has Grayson Allen been at Duke for like 10 years?
He showed up big to beat UW, he can stay there as long as he want IMO
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 10:27:29 PM
He showed up big to beat UW, he can stay there as long as he want IMO

True dat.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 23, 2018, 10:36:22 PM
Is it just my imagination or has Grayson Allen been at Duke for like 10 years?

Nah, you're trippin.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MUEng92 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:51 PM
If Grayson Allen shot 3's as well as Cain, much less Rowsey, Howard or Hauser, Duke would be up by 17
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 23, 2018, 10:56:07 PM
Bagley is really good at anticipating where the ball will be.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 24, 2018, 05:00:53 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/RichterScaleee/status/977618670309576704/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fraiderforums.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D3%26p%3D555002%23p555002
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: We R Final Four on March 24, 2018, 06:31:43 PM
I can’t wait for Custer to grad transfer here next year.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 24, 2018, 06:33:06 PM
I can’t wait for Custer to grad transfer here next year.

That'd be unreal
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 24, 2018, 06:44:17 PM
We need to risk violations to get Custer here
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: nyg on March 24, 2018, 06:46:25 PM
We need to risk violations to get Custer here

He gets team to Final Four, he’s a legend there.  Would be shocked if he left. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: drewm88 on March 24, 2018, 06:48:21 PM
He gets team to Final Four, he’s a legend there.  Would be shocked if he left.

Agreed. The chance (if there ever was one) probably went out the window when they won the MVC tournament to make it in.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 24, 2018, 06:51:36 PM
He gets team to Final Four, he’s a legend there.  Would be shocked if he left.

Coach leaves. Best friend graduates.

It’s possible
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 24, 2018, 07:00:57 PM
I realize not all schools have an open scholly but Custer on the open market would have no shortage of suitors
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 24, 2018, 07:05:58 PM
Started to have flashbacks to Illinois comeback against Arizona in the Elite 8 in 2005. Luckily for Loyola, ain't nobody on this Kansas St. team can shoot like Deron Williams, Dee Brown and Luther Head can.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 24, 2018, 07:32:31 PM
There is zero chance he takes the team to a Final Four and he transfers even if the coach leaves.  Don't be ridiculous. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 24, 2018, 07:36:05 PM
There is zero chance he takes the team to a Final Four and he transfers even if the coach leaves.  Don't be ridiculous.

With his buddy Ben Richardson graduating I could see it. Doubtful still but I could see it
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: We R Final Four on March 24, 2018, 08:08:19 PM
I can’t wait for Custer to grad transfer here next year.
I thought no teal needed.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 24, 2018, 09:52:54 PM
There is zero chance he takes the team to a Final Four and he transfers even if the coach leaves.  Don't be ridiculous.

Zero chance? I don't think we can say that. Sure I don't expect it but I would hardly call it impossible. What if he loved this postseason run and wants to do it again? If he looks around and thinks Loyola is loosing too much he could consider transferring to a better situated team.

And that's just one of many theoretical reasons
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 24, 2018, 10:02:18 PM
There is zero chance he takes the team to a Final Four and he transfers even if the coach leaves.  Don't be ridiculous.

Yeah, except....

http://www.redstormsports.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/060617aaa.html
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Mr. Nielsen on March 24, 2018, 10:11:58 PM
I wonder what Houston feels like, with Michigan in the Final Four.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GrimmReaper33 on March 24, 2018, 10:17:50 PM
I can’t wait for Custer to grad transfer here next year.

Why would he transfer down?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Anti-Dentite on March 25, 2018, 06:22:33 AM
Zero chance? I don't think we can say that. Sure I don't expect it but I would hardly call it impossible. What if he loved this postseason run and wants to do it again? If he looks around and thinks Loyola is loosing too much he could consider transferring to a better situated team.

And that's just one of many theoretical reasons
Okay 1% chance and it's losing not loosing, sorry, pet peeve.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: brewcity77 on March 25, 2018, 07:19:49 AM
Custer and Townes are both grad transfer eligible. Loyola also loses three seniors. If Moser were to leave, that program could drop right back to the bottom of the Valley.

As great a run as this is, it's also been a charmed life escaping the first weekend by 3 points and lucking into a 7 and 9 seed in the second weekend. The players have to know that too.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 25, 2018, 07:27:40 AM
Custer and Townes are both grad transfer eligible. Loyola also loses three seniors. If Moser were to leave, that program could drop right back to the bottom of the Valley.

As great a run as this is, it's also been a charmed life escaping the first weekend by 3 points and lucking into a 7 and 9 seed in the second weekend. The players have to know that too.

Yep. Loyola's a missed shot away from being a 1st round exit.

Michigan had a pretty similar run.  Buzzer beater in 2nd round, 7 & 9 seed in the 2nd weekend.

Luck and good fortune played a role in both runs.  It can be a thin line between disappointment and elation.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: brewcity77 on March 25, 2018, 09:21:11 AM
Luck and good fortune played a role in both runs.  It can be a thin line between disappointment and elation.

Agreed. It's rare that a team gets deep in the tournament without close calls. This could just as easily be Miami and Houston. Or what if Vander Blue's layup in 2013 rims out? That's what makes the tournament so great, but also why it's risky to put much stock in its results.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 01:25:49 PM
This is not a good start for Villanova.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 25, 2018, 01:38:12 PM
This is not a good start for Villanova.

Not too bad at the under 12
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: statnik on March 25, 2018, 01:49:23 PM
This is not a good start for Villanova.

The refs then knew they had to intervene.  I have never seen a perimeter oriented team get so many calls like they tend to when a team poses a challenge.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 01:51:31 PM
The refs then knew they had to intervene.  I have never seen a perimeter oriented team get so many calls like they tend to when a team poses a challenge.

Dude. Texas Tech fouled the shooter like 4 times in a row.

It was horrible defense not poor officiating.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 01:53:48 PM
Brunson not playing very well so far

Nova still up
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 25, 2018, 01:58:16 PM
2 for Bridges and spellman.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: statnik on March 25, 2018, 02:00:06 PM
Dude. Texas Tech fouled the shooter like 4 times in a row.

It was horrible defense not poor officiating.

You think 8 fouls in a row on Texas Tech while none in the same timeframe against Texas Tech were all legit?  This coming off the heels of Villanova getting similar treatment early in the 2nd half against West Virginia when they were falling behind.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 25, 2018, 02:00:52 PM
Tech getting good looks from penetration whenever they want. Nova still looks like the best team I’ve seen this year
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 25, 2018, 02:01:48 PM
You think 8 fouls in a row on Texas Tech while none in the same timeframe against Texas Tech were all legit?  This coming off the heels of Villanova getting similar treatment early in the 2nd half against West Virginia when they were falling behind.


Yes.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 02:04:11 PM
You think 8 fouls in a row on Texas Tech while none in the same timeframe against Texas Tech were all legit?  This coming off the heels of Villanova getting similar treatment early in the 2nd half against West Virginia when they were falling behind.

Texas Tech has 9 fouls total

Nova has 7.

Again, they smacked the arm of the nova shooter 4 times in a row
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 02:05:04 PM
2 for Bridges and spellman.

Yeah appears refs are rigging it for Nova!!!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 02:09:53 PM
Villanova is relentless on offense.  Good enough on defense.  Lots of long arms and good switching.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: real chili 83 on March 25, 2018, 02:10:23 PM
Nova v Loyola.  That would be something
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 02:15:57 PM
Go, Catholics!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: forgetful on March 25, 2018, 02:17:58 PM
You think 8 fouls in a row on Texas Tech while none in the same timeframe against Texas Tech were all legit?  This coming off the heels of Villanova getting similar treatment early in the 2nd half against West Virginia when they were falling behind.

Tech and West Virginia repeatedly place two hands on the offensive player as they are driving to the hoop.  They also reach tremendously often. 

Automatic fouls.  West Virginia was actually lucky they did't call more.  They foul every possession. 

Nova is strong with the ball so the reaches, grabs become much more obvious as the ball is never jarred loose (can make it look like a clean steal). 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DUNKS45 on March 25, 2018, 02:19:02 PM
Yeah Nova vs Loyola would be ideal.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on March 25, 2018, 03:09:45 PM
Villanova 4-21 on 3s. Ugh. And they're open 3s for the most part. They need to find some offense or will be going home. TT waking up on offense a little.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 03:10:54 PM
Star Wars moment..... I've  got a bad feeling about this.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: jesmu84 on March 25, 2018, 03:14:46 PM
The refs then knew they had to intervene.  I have never seen a perimeter oriented team get so many calls like they tend to when a team poses a challenge.

How's your conspiracy theory now in the second half?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 03:16:56 PM
Good call.  Remember when the refs were biased for Villanova?  So wrong.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: statnik on March 25, 2018, 03:21:09 PM
How's your conspiracy theory now in the second half?

I call it as I see it.  You remember the game we played at Villanova?  They were in the bonus 6 or 7 minutes into the 2nd half if I recall correctly?  To me it’s a trend I see when I’ve watched them.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 03:29:29 PM
Villanova gets fouled because they are all strong with the ball, all  can shoot  from 3, all can get to the basket, and run their sets to perfection.
And have big guards.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 03:37:39 PM
I call it as I see it.  You remember the game we played at Villanova?  They were in the bonus 6 or 7 minutes into the 2nd half if I recall correctly?  To me it’s a trend I see when I’ve watched them.

Ahhh

So the issue here is your vision
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on March 25, 2018, 03:38:26 PM
Every team has a poor game in the tournament. It looks like Villanova is going to survive theirs.

(http://tscpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Survive-and-Advance.jpg)
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: nyg on March 25, 2018, 03:40:05 PM
Another ref conspiracy, ugh.

On side note Nova goes 4 for 24 from three, but shoots 30 for 36 from the line. 

Good win for BE, keep it going. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 25, 2018, 03:40:48 PM
Nova hardly broke a sweat. Only way I see them losing is a team shoots a ridiculous percentage that Nova can’t match. It could happen but they’ve been the best team all year
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 03:45:34 PM
Villanova's best is better than anybody else's best.     
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: brewcity77 on March 25, 2018, 04:35:13 PM
Interesting stat. Jay Wright hasn't lost a second weekend game in over a decade. Nova is 6-0 in Sweet 16 and Elite 8 games since 2009. If you don't beat Nova in the first weekend, they are going to the Final Four.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 25, 2018, 05:50:23 PM
Duke is a really stupid team

Horrible shot selection

Duval raking contested 3s is almost funnier then Carter taking 3 3s.

Grayson has fallen off a cliff since his sophomore year
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: willie warrior on March 25, 2018, 06:21:58 PM
This guy New man from Kansas is a big time stud.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: tower912 on March 25, 2018, 06:24:50 PM
Duke is a really stupid team

Horrible shot selection

Duval raking contested 3s is almost funnier then Carter taking 3 3s.

Grayson has fallen off a cliff since his sophomore year
Wait, 4 freshmen can be a dumb team?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: nyg on March 25, 2018, 06:31:36 PM
Duval bad turnover trying to dribble thru double team, with Duke up one.

Then, Trent bad shot.  Both lead to Kansas scores.  They should have gone to Bagley, but did not. 

Newman helping himself big time with draft potential in tournament play.  I mean Ayton from Arizona is probably number one pick, but some team gonna be very lucky with Bagley, he is a player.

Go Nova, should be good game vs Kansas.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 25, 2018, 06:34:48 PM
Way too much Allen shooting the ball. He’s not who he thinks he is
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Mr. Nielsen on March 25, 2018, 06:37:23 PM
Wow, excellent game on a big stage for the game.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 25, 2018, 06:42:50 PM
Graham gives me hope that MH can step into the point
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 25, 2018, 06:43:41 PM
I feel like a proud parent right now, so happy for Malik.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 25, 2018, 07:13:49 PM
Not the deciding factor obviously,  but I thought Duke got hosed on Caters last foul. That looked like a clear charge to me
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: NickelDimer on March 25, 2018, 07:27:02 PM
I feel like a proud parent right now, so happy for Malik.
Huge game from him. He was awesome
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: brewcity77 on March 25, 2018, 07:47:24 PM
Not the deciding factor obviously,  but I thought Duke got hosed on Caters last foul. That looked like a clear charge to me

Probably the most textbook charge I've seen all year. Was shocked to see that go the other way.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Loose Cannon on March 25, 2018, 08:48:35 PM
I feel like a proud parent right now, so happy for Malik.

Yeah, I remember how you posted the closeness he has with your kids and the family.  Outstanding game for him, he really delivered in the OT.  Congrats. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 25, 2018, 09:20:47 PM
Malik and I trade texts before/after every game. He just texted me asking us if we can make it down to San Antonio.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 25, 2018, 09:22:43 PM
Malik and I trade texts before/after every game. He just texted me asking us if we can make it down to San Antonio.


That is so very cool. 
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: drewm88 on March 25, 2018, 09:22:57 PM
Yeah, I remember how you posted the closeness he has with your kids and the family.  Outstanding game for him, he really delivered in the OT.  Congrats.

Same. Been a big fan of his since the day you shared that story. Very impressed with him today.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MU82 on March 25, 2018, 10:07:45 PM
Stoopid Coach K.

Playing zone killed the Dookies. KU kept finding the middle of it and getting open looks. Only a matter of time before the shots went down.

If only a Scooper who knows more than every coach could have told K to not play zone.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: WarriorDad on March 25, 2018, 10:56:48 PM
Malik and I trade texts before/after every game. He just texted me asking us if we can make it down to San Antonio.

You going?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Floorslapper on March 25, 2018, 10:57:01 PM
Stoopid Coach K.

Playing zone killed the Dookies. KU kept finding the middle of it and getting open looks. Only a matter of time before the shots went down.

If only a Scooper who knows more than every coach could have told K to not play zone.

Okay - I'll bite.  Help me understand what your objective is in making this kind of post?  You do this frequently.  Maybe you get off on trying to pick fights? 

Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MU82 on March 25, 2018, 11:00:43 PM
Okay - I'll bite.  Help me understand what your objective is in making this kind of post?  You do this frequently.  Maybe you get off on trying to pick fights?

Guilty.

I was feeling goofy. Just ignore it.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GooooMarquette on March 25, 2018, 11:15:44 PM
Not the deciding factor obviously,  but I thought Duke got hosed on Caters last foul. That looked like a clear charge to me

Yep.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 25, 2018, 11:28:28 PM
You going?

Good question, trying to coordinate with Malik, my wife/kids. Trying not to bother him tonight to see if I can get my wife and two other kids tickets too, figured I’d talk to him tomorrow or Tuesday. His phone has to be blowing up. I’m actually in Austin right now, and when my flight landed, I was surprised/ecstatic to have gotten a text from him about an hour after the game had ended.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 26, 2018, 11:01:16 AM
A couple of media organizations have called asking if my son and I can make it to San Antonio so they can do stories on my son and Malik for their Final Four coverage. I don't think my son Bradley is going to be Kansas' version of Sister Jean, but you might see us pop up if you're watching some pregame shows this weekend.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: We R Final Four on March 26, 2018, 11:14:09 AM
That’s so great!
Maybe throw a Warriors shirt on the boy?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: GGGG on March 26, 2018, 11:37:08 AM
A couple of media organizations have called asking if my son and I can make it to San Antonio so they can do stories on my son and Malik for their Final Four coverage. I don't think my son Bradley is going to be Kansas' version of Sister Jean, but you might see us pop up if you're watching some pregame shows this weekend.


I haven't been a fan of Kansas since 2003.  You are making me like them again!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: MU82 on March 26, 2018, 02:02:23 PM
I just got two more looks at that blocking foul that fouled out Duke's Wendell Carter.

I didn't think it was a bad call at all. It looked to me like Carter leaned to the left so his shoulder got clipped by Newman, who was clearly trying to avoid contact.

At worst, IMHO, it was a borderline call. Certainly not in the "horrible call" category.

Here's what Carter had to say about it:

"No matter what I think, how I felt about it, he made the right call. I have respect for that call."

Classy answer for a kid - even though he probably thought the call was wrong.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Loose Cannon on March 26, 2018, 03:00:15 PM
I just got two more looks at that blocking foul that fouled out Duke's Wendell Carter.

I didn't think it was a bad call at all. It looked to me like Carter leaned to the left so his shoulder got clipped by Newman, who was clearly trying to avoid contact.

At worst, IMHO, it was a borderline call. Certainly not in the "horrible call" category.

Here's what Carter had to say about it:

"No matter what I think, how I felt about it, he made the right call. I have respect for that call."

Classy answer for a kid - even though he probably thought the call was wrong.

Classy as well for Bagley, after he threw that Bad pass in the finale seconds I read his face as thinking as disappointing as he was  he quickly, mentally suck it up to control his emotions. I like this Guy.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Mr. Nielsen on March 26, 2018, 03:37:36 PM
Duke/Kansas was the highest overnight Elite 8 rating in 13 years.

Sunday’s Kansas-Duke NCAA Tournament regional final earned a 10.1 overnight rating on CBS, up 6% from last year (UNC-Kentucky: 9.5)
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 27, 2018, 09:31:21 AM
Duke/Kansas was the highest overnight Elite 8 rating in 13 years.

Sunday’s Kansas-Duke NCAA Tournament regional final earned a 10.1 overnight rating on CBS, up 6% from last year (UNC-Kentucky: 9.5)

Funny, that's one of the few NCAA tourney games I didn't watch!
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 28, 2018, 10:03:57 AM
I don't know if this matters to anyone, but wanted to give an update. I have a friend who covers the NFL for ESPN, and the writer reached out to me on Monday asking about our interest in doing a segment for ESPN's Final Four coverage on my son and Malik and their friendship. We were of course interested, and the writer gave me a bit of info on the inner workings of ESPN (which for anyone working anywhere, would fall in line with what you'd expect in any organization). The writer's NFL bosses asked the College Basketball folks if they were ok with the NFL writer doing the story. There's a particular college basketball writer at ESPN that has a lot of creative control, and already had stories planned for KU this week, and he shot down the idea of giving our story over to the NFL writer. Long story short, you won't see us on any ESPN coverage this week.

I'm by no means mad or disappointed, I understand the college basketball writer is trying to protect his turf. just wanted to share this with anyone that was curious.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: 🏀 on March 28, 2018, 10:14:02 AM
A couple of media organizations have called asking if my son and I can make it to San Antonio so they can do stories on my son and Malik for their Final Four coverage. I don't think my son Bradley is going to be Kansas' version of Sister Jean, but you might see us pop up if you're watching some pregame shows this weekend.

Bradley > Sister Jean
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: Loose Cannon on March 28, 2018, 10:42:41 AM
I don't know if this matters to anyone, but wanted to give an update. I have a friend who covers the NFL for ESPN, and the writer reached out to me on Monday asking about our interest in doing a segment for ESPN's Final Four coverage on my son and Malik and their friendship. We were of course interested, and the writer gave me a bit of info on the inner workings of ESPN (which for anyone working anywhere, would fall in line with what you'd expect in any organization). The writer's NFL bosses asked the College Basketball folks if they were ok with the NFL writer doing the story. There's a particular college basketball writer at ESPN that has a lot of creative control, and already had stories planned for KU this week, and he shot down the idea of giving our story over to the NFL writer. Long story short, you won't see us on any ESPN coverage this week.

I'm by no means mad or disappointed, I understand the college basketball writer is trying to protect his turf. just wanted to share this with anyone that was curious.

Maybe it's meant to be as part of the build up for the Championship Game.  That might be the Destiny of your story.  I hope so Great Story.
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: cheebs09 on March 28, 2018, 12:12:04 PM
I don't know if this matters to anyone, but wanted to give an update. I have a friend who covers the NFL for ESPN, and the writer reached out to me on Monday asking about our interest in doing a segment for ESPN's Final Four coverage on my son and Malik and their friendship. We were of course interested, and the writer gave me a bit of info on the inner workings of ESPN (which for anyone working anywhere, would fall in line with what you'd expect in any organization). The writer's NFL bosses asked the College Basketball folks if they were ok with the NFL writer doing the story. There's a particular college basketball writer at ESPN that has a lot of creative control, and already had stories planned for KU this week, and he shot down the idea of giving our story over to the NFL writer. Long story short, you won't see us on any ESPN coverage this week.

I'm by no means mad or disappointed, I understand the college basketball writer is trying to protect his turf. just wanted to share this with anyone that was curious.

Is this the college basketball writer that likes to hang out in Lithuania following around a certain family?
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: DegenerateDish on March 28, 2018, 12:15:49 PM
Is this the college basketball writer that likes to hang out in Lithuania following around a certain family?

<Nods>
Title: Re: Sweet 16 thread
Post by: cheebs09 on March 28, 2018, 01:39:10 PM
<Nods>

He probably is looking for an angle to include Buzz in a positive light.