It may be 100 degrees when the teams take the field in LA tonight for game 1 of the WS. Probably will feel even hotter on the field. Do you think the players would rather be in that kind of heat, or the cold, wet conditions that permeate the upper Midwest right now. Yes, they are glad to be there. And they don't care about the weather because they are in the WS. But all other things being equal, too hot, or cold and damp?
Quote from: tower912 on October 24, 2017, 11:05:23 AM
It may be 100 degrees when the teams take the field in LA tonight for game 1 of the WS. Probably will feel even hotter on the field. Do you think the players would rather be in that kind of heat, or the cold, wet conditions that permeate the upper Midwest right now. Yes, they are glad to be there. And they don't care about the weather because they are in the WS. But all other things being equal, too hot, or cold and damp?
Depends on if your a hitter or pitcher....hitters will love it and pitchers will hate. Ball will carry and breaking stuff won't break nearly as much. #NoHumidity
As your tag line notes Real Warriors dont whine. lol
Neither team in WS is from the upper midwest and neither of them could relate to your cold weather.
My guess is neither LA or Hou has any problem with 100 deg....and both are happy to not be playing a team in northern cold... this time of year.
This weekend...In Houston ....we will close the roof and play at about room temperature
Yeah, but it's a dry heat..........
Quote from: tower912 on October 24, 2017, 11:05:23 AM
It may be 100 degrees when the teams take the field in LA tonight for game 1 of the WS. Probably will feel even hotter on the field. Do you think the players would rather be in that kind of heat, or the cold, wet conditions that permeate the upper Midwest right now. Yes, they are glad to be there. And they don't care about the weather because they are in the WS. But all other things being equal, too hot, or cold and damp?
Yes, the games should be played at Yankee Stadium, the home of the World Series.
It also depends where the individual players grew up. Lots of those guys grew up near the equator. They're at home in the 100 degree weather. If it was me, a Milwaukee native, I'd rather play in 50 degrees than 100.
Chris Taylor has been unreal. Just a steal of a find by the Dodgers.
Quote from: BrewCity83 on October 24, 2017, 04:42:40 PM
It also depends where the individual players grew up. Lots of those guys grew up near the equator. They're at home in the 100 degree weather. If it was me, a Milwaukee native, I'd rather play in 50 degrees than 100.
I think it depends mostly on where you've been for the past few years than on where you grew up.
I was born and raised in Milwaukee, then lived in Nashville and Richmond for 4 years before moving back north. The first couple of summers in Nashville were unbearable, but then I got used to them. And when I moved back north, the first couple of winters back were unbearable.
My guess is that these guys are fine after spending most of the summer playing baseball in SoCal/Houston.
Is 100 degrees or cold/rainy the only choices? If so, I'm guessing the vast majority of players would rather be where it is hot and dry.
They should have split the difference and played the WS in Charlotte!
BTW, I find myself rooting for Kershaw, and therefore the Dodgers. I don't like it when an athlete as dominant as Kershaw gets stuck with the "but he hasn't won the big one" label. Yes, in a couple of cases it was Kershaw's own fault that he didn't advance to give himself a chance to avoid the label, but still, I'd like to see him shed it.
He's off to a very nice start.
I also am rooting for the Dodgers. Since I have had MLB.tv, I started watching a lot of Kershaw games, then got sucked in by Vin Scully and have watched more than a few Dodger games the last 3-4 years.
It was great to see Kershaw put some of the demons away last night and just completely dominate in a WS game.
After the record heat in LA for the first two games, the WS shifts back to Houston...and the gods must be aware we are playing ball in late Oct. ...Houston is looking to a record cold snap outside...we are going down to 40s at night.
But...As they like the crowd noise, the Minute Maid roof will be closed and ambient heat will still have the WS playing area at a very comfortable level ...about room temperature
Quote from: houwarrior on October 25, 2017, 12:07:41 PM
After the record heat in LA for the first two games, the WS shifts back to Houston...and the gods must be aware we are playing ball in late Oct. ...Houston is looking to a record cold snap outside...we are going down to 40s at night.
But...As they like the crowd noise, the Minute Maid roof will be closed and ambient heat will still have the WS playing area at a very comfortable level ...about room temperature
kinda like Miller Park for the final 4, ai'na?
Quote from: houwarrior on October 24, 2017, 11:24:57 AM
As your tag line notes Real Warriors dont whine. lol
Speaking of taglines, that quote is from Evelyn Beatrice Hall's book The Friends of Voltaire. It's not actually a quote from Voltaire himself.
For the record, Evelyn Beatrice Hall never met Chicos either.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on October 25, 2017, 02:43:53 PM
Speaking of taglines, that quote is from Evelyn Beatrice Hall's book The Friends of Voltaire. It's not actually a quote from Voltaire himself.
For the record, Evelyn Beatrice Hall never met Chicos either.
Thanks for correcting this
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on October 25, 2017, 02:43:53 PM
For the record, Evelyn Beatrice Hall never met Chicos either.
:)
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 25, 2017, 06:41:24 PM
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
Baseball is evolving into a local sport. Less and less interest when your team is not involved. I watched, but last night was a boring game if you didn't have a real rooting interest. Not lots of baserunners and action.
Too few balls in play in the modern game.
Quote from: CTWarrior on October 25, 2017, 06:44:41 PM
last night was a boring game if you didn't have a real rooting interest. Not lots of baserunners and action.
Too few balls in play in the modern game.
I know I am in the minority when it comes to baseball, but gosh I couldn't disagree more. That was a masterfully pitched game on both sides. And from the Dodgers side, and a baseball history side, it was one of the best pitchers in the history of the game completely dominating and displaying the stuff which makes him so great. I enjoyed the hell out of that game.
Oh, and I am expecting a similar style game tonight. Verlander will be himself and I would bet Hill will be pretty dang good for 6 or so innings.
Quote from: buckchuckler on October 25, 2017, 06:50:34 PM
I know I am in the minority when it comes to baseball, but gosh I couldn't disagree more. That was a masterfully pitched game on both sides. And from the Dodgers side, and a baseball history side, it was one of the best pitchers in the history of the game completely dominating and displaying the stuff which makes him so great. I enjoyed the hell out of that game.
Agreed. Baseball is my least favorite of the 3 main sports but I think their postseason is my favorite postseason of them all (at least when looking at just the pros...nothing beats March Madness). The crowd going nuts the whole game, the intensity of every pitch, typically in cold weather. Nothing better. The Postseason is the only time I watch baseball other than Brewers games.
Quote from: buckchuckler on October 25, 2017, 06:50:34 PM
I know I am in the minority when it comes to baseball, but gosh I couldn't disagree more. That was a masterfully pitched game on both sides. And from the Dodgers side, and a baseball history side, it was one of the best pitchers in the history of the game completely dominating and displaying the stuff which makes him so great. I enjoyed the hell out of that game.
+1
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 25, 2017, 06:41:24 PM
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
Not the entire reason, but the game being so quick caused a hit. Usually more people watch at the end, and that helps the average rating. Learned that on Twitter today.
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 25, 2017, 06:41:24 PM
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
Except they weren't awful. In fact, the second highest game 1 World Series in the last 7 years. Only last year in a historic matchup with the Cubs playing for their first World Series in decades was better since 2010. All the markets viewership numbers aren't even in yet and it already is 2nd best since 2010.
Wow. What a great, fun game. That was awesome. I'm hoping for 5 more like it.
Quote from: buckchuckler on October 26, 2017, 12:31:42 AM
Wow. What a great, fun game. That was awesome. I'm hoping for 5 more like it.
Yeah, that was more like it. What a fun game.
Two great games, polar opposites from one another. Heat is overrated.
Today's "let the bullpen win it for you" philosophy is wonderful ... except when it isn't.
I'm not "blaming" Roberts for anything, because that's just the game today, although I probably wouldn't have asked Jansen to get 6 outs.
Quote from: MU82 on October 26, 2017, 12:05:08 PM
Today's "let the bullpen win it for you" philosophy is wonderful ... except when it isn't.
I'm not "blaming" Roberts for anything, because that's just the game today, although I probably wouldn't have asked Jansen to get 6 outs.
With a 2-run lead, the Dodgers had it set up to go Stripling/LHP in the 7th, Morrow in the 8th and Jansen in the 9th. Stribling allowed a 4-pitch walk to lead off the 7th and got yanked. Instead of going to a lefty in Watson or Cingrani to face Reddick and a PH, he asked Morrow to finish the 7th and start the 8th, something he rarely did during the season. After Morrow allowed the double, it was Jansen time. I don't necessarily think Roberts going to Jansen early was "wrong" at the time, but I do think that he got a bit too anxious in the 7th and that affected the rest of the game.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on October 26, 2017, 02:13:22 PM
With a 2-run lead, the Dodgers had it set up to go Stripling/LHP in the 7th, Morrow in the 8th and Jansen in the 9th. Stribling allowed a 4-pitch walk to lead off the 7th and got yanked. Instead of going to a lefty in Watson or Cingrani to face Reddick and a PH, he asked Morrow to finish the 7th and start the 8th, something he rarely did during the season. After Morrow allowed the double, it was Jansen time. I don't necessarily think Roberts going to Jansen early was "wrong" at the time, but I do think that he got a bit too anxious in the 7th and that affected the rest of the game.
It has certainly worked for Roberts, but he made it easy to second guess him yesterday with removing Hill after 60 pitches, Stripling after 4, and bringing Kenley in with a runner on second.
Also, how crazy was that pickoff throw hitting the ump and the bounce off Taylor's hat. Just craziness. What a fun game.
Quote from: MU82 on October 26, 2017, 12:05:08 PM
Today's "let the bullpen win it for you" philosophy is wonderful ... except when it isn't.
I'm not "blaming" Roberts for anything, because that's just the game today, although I probably wouldn't have asked Jansen to get 6 outs.
He had to take Hill out after 4 innings. He was getting shelled.
Quote from: Jockey on October 26, 2017, 02:58:50 PM
He had to take Hill out after 4 innings. He was getting shelled.
Teal?
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 25, 2017, 06:41:24 PM
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
Ratings are doing great. Last night's game four was higher than Cubs game 4 last year. Overall for the series, it is outpacing every World Series since 2010 except last year's historic Cubs series, but isn't far behind. Considering all the excuses of cord cutting, boring sport, etc, somehow baseball is outpacing years when cord cutting didn't even exist (2010-2014).
Quote from: 4or5yearstojudge on October 29, 2017, 01:27:36 PM
Ratings are doing great. Last night's game four was higher than Cubs game 4 last year. Overall for the series, it is outpacing every World Series since 2010 except last year's historic Cubs series, but isn't far behind. Considering all the excuses of cord cutting, boring sport, etc, somehow baseball is outpacing years when cord cutting didn't even exist (2010-2014).
So the ratings are down this year. Got it. Thanks.
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 29, 2017, 01:33:25 PM
So the ratings are down this year. Got it. Thanks.
That isn't at all what you said a few days ago, yet it was only 48 hours ago that you were so hung up on the exact wording that another user here said about recruiting for not including the player's name (even though it was in the previous sentence), but now you don't play by your own words or rules. Surprised? Nah.
Quote from: QuentinsWorld on October 25, 2017, 06:41:24 PM
Ratings for game 1 were awful. It must be all those players protesting that's driving viewers away...
In fact, the ratings for game 1 were not awful. They were very good. You didn't say anything vs last year. From a raw viewership number, it was the second highest in the last 7 years. Through the first two games, the pattern holds. The early read on games three and four show this will be a very good TV rated World Series, not awful like you said.
Quote from: 4or5yearstojudge on October 29, 2017, 08:16:51 PM
That isn't at all what you said a few days ago, yet it was only 48 hours ago that you were so hung up on the exact wording that another user here said about recruiting for not including the player's name (even though it was in the previous sentence), but now you don't play by your own words or rules. Surprised? Nah.
In fact, the ratings for game 1 were not awful. They were very good. You didn't say anything vs last year. From a raw viewership number, it was the second highest in the last 7 years. Through the first two games, the pattern holds. The early read on games three and four show this will be a very good TV rated World Series, not awful like you said.
Huh? I responded to your comment about the ratings being up except when compared to last year. AKA, the ratings are down this year. Got it. Thanks.
Not sure what the rest of this rant is about. But always good to talk to you chicolooper.
PS What other usernames have you had on here so I can include them when talking to you?
I wonder how TV ratings will be for game 5. Probably God Awful.
Quote from: 4or5yearstojudge on October 30, 2017, 12:45:54 AM
I wonder how TV ratings will be for game 5. Probably God Awful.
Depends how many players kneel before it.
Quote from: jesmu84 on October 30, 2017, 12:46:53 AM
Depends how many players kneel before it.
Since none did, I'm going out on a limb to say strong ratings. Someone else will probably say they were awful.
Correlation does not imply causation.
Stats 101