MUScoop
MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on February 07, 2017, 10:01:47 PM
-
We're going to smoke Georgetown on Saturday. I like our chances to win 4 straight. Tonight was just a blip. Hot shooting returns. We get some revenge against St. John's and Providence.
Time to roll. Taking a Scoop hiatus until Saturday.
-
I'm going to repeat this about 15 times in the next 24 hours...
We picked the wrong night to miss our 3's.
Rowsey 0-fer.... Reinhardt off.
Would have won with even an average rowsey game.
-
I admire your confidence. I really don't have any confidence in this team. If we light it up from 3 we can beat anyone. However, if that doesn't happen this team just is not very good. We just aren't tough enough mentally and physically for the big east
-
I doubt MU beats Georgetown on Saturday. The Hoyas are playing a lot better these days and if they are on they will be hard to beat.
-
Poop
-
Send me your venmo
I'll personally give you $200 if we win our next 4.
-
There is nothing to suggest we can win 4 straight BE games.
Just win one and see what happens.
-
4 straight? Um ok. What alternate reality would that be in? One game at a time.
-
We're going to smoke Georgetown on Saturday. I like our chances to win 4 straight. Tonight was just a blip. Hot shooting returns. We get some revenge against St. John's and Providence.
Time to roll. Taking a Scoop hiatus until Saturday.
Worth noting that Marquette hasn't won four straight Big East games since February 25 to March 9, 2013, when Marquette knocked off Syracuse and Notre Dame at the Bradley Center, then went on the road and beat Rutgers and St. John's to win the Big East.
-
We just need to pick up the defense intensity. It felt like MU defense was non - existent at some stretches of the game. Im confident in the team now but i would be even more confident if we could pick up the defense
-
R-E-L-A-X only applies when you have a player like Aaron Rodgers. MU does not have that player. 3-3 would be a good finish, and that puts MU in line for an NIT bid. Progress, but not quite there yet.
-
Agree with the 4 straight.
Prior to this game I thought Gtown/Xavier (home) /St Johns / and Providence would be the 4 winnable games. Nothing has changed after the Butler loss - it's just eliminated any room for error.
Xavier at home with a week to prep is a better match up than Butler at home when Butler had a week to sit on B2B losses..
JJJ better show up vs. Georgetown. He called out their intensity after the first game in the post game interview. They will certainly be bringing their best on Saturday. It's about time JJJ brought his.
-
We're going to smoke Georgetown on Saturday. I like our chances to win 4 straight. Tonight was just a blip. Hot shooting returns. We get some revenge against St. John's and Providence.
Time to roll. Taking a Scoop hiatus until Saturday.
I would bet anything we are NOT winning at Georgetown. This is an incredibly flawed team that does one thing well: Hit threes. When the threes aren't falling there is no Plan B.
-
I would bet anything we are NOT winning at Georgetown. This is an incredibly flawed team that does one thing well: Hit threes. When the threes aren't falling there is no Plan B.
How were we any different in December when we beat Georgetown?
-
E-X-L-A-X, hey?
-
We can beat Georgetown. Wojo should try switching up the lineup maybe start KR and rowsey
-
Why Not? Show them something they haven't prepared for
-
How were we any different in December when we beat Georgetown?
1. That game was at home.
2. First BE game so Gtown couldn't plan as well for us.
3. We are playing like crap and Gtown has been playing better lately.
-
I'm not expecting a win versus Georgetown. Definitely doable though.
-
Georgetown is playing better? I suppose, maybe, but they have lost two in a row, 4 of 7, and two of the wins were DePaul and a reeling Creighton team that we also took advantage of. The Butler win notwithstanding, what has Georgetown done since beating Oregon in November to convince anyone they're playing better?
Someone yesterday, I think wades, pointed out that Butler was the best team left on the schedule. I'm not saying our backs aren't against the wall, they are, but we lost a toss up game. Really didn't change much other than needing one against X rather than it being a luxury.
-
1. That game was at home.
2. First BE game so Gtown couldn't plan as well for us.
3. We are playing like crap and Gtown has been playing better lately.
1) It's not like we have a giant home court advantage, and neither does Georgetown.
2) Is there some rule against watching tape of non-conference play that I haven't heard of or...?
3) Georgetown just struggled to beat DePaul by 3 2 games ago while we took care of them by 12 (I believe).
-
Someone yesterday, I think wades, pointed out that Butler was the best team left on the schedule. I'm not saying our backs aren't against the wall, they are, but we lost a toss up game. Really didn't change much other than needing one against X rather than it being a luxury.
Butler may have been the best team remaining on the schedule, but it wasn't the toughest game.
According to RPI Wizard, MU's odds of beating Butler were 51%. They have a 31% chance of winning at Xavier, 45% at Gtown and 49% vs Creighton. MU also has 54% chance at PC and 53% chance home vs Xavier. Got to win those near 50/50 games to go dancing.
-
Butler may have been the best team remaining on the schedule, but it wasn't the toughest game.
According to RPI Wizard, MU's odds of beating Butler were 51%. They have a 31% chance of winning at Xavier, 45% at Gtown and 49% vs Creighton. MU also has 54% chance at PC and 53% chance home vs Xavier. Got to win those near 50/50 games to go dancing.
Also finish on a positive note
-
Georgetown is playing better? I suppose, maybe, but they have lost two in a row, 4 of 7, and two of the wins were DePaul and a reeling Creighton team that we also took advantage of. The Butler win notwithstanding, what has Georgetown done since beating Oregon in November to convince anyone they're playing better?
And what have we done since beating Villanova. Its two mediocre teams on life-support fighting for their NCAA tourney lives this Saturday. Advantage to the home team.
-
Truth is we have had multiple opportunities this season to take control of our destiny by winning very 'winnable' games - win 2 of those and the season is in a completely different place.
- Pitt, Seton Hall 1, Butler 1, Providence 1, St Johns 1
I know people will argue differently but MI & WI could have been competitive as well - so opportunities lost.
I've kind of reached a breaking point with this team where no loss is surprising and I have less hope going into each game that we show up. At this stage they need to gel again down (similiar to VU/Creighton week) to get me excited for next year. So very relaxed.
-
Truth is we have had multiple opportunities this season to take control of our destiny by winning very 'winnable' games - win 2 of those and the season is in a completely different place.
- Pitt, Seton Hall 1, Butler 1, Providence 1, St Johns 1
I know people will argue differently but MI & WI could have been competitive as well - so opportunities lost.
I've kind of reached a breaking point with this team where no loss is surprising and I have less hope going into each game that we show up. At this stage they need to gel again down (similiar to VU/Creighton week) to get me excited for next year. So very relaxed.
Of course, in theory, every game on the schedule there was potential to win. Fact of the matter unless you're Gonzaga playing in the WCC you aren't going to win them all.
-
Of course, in theory, every game on the schedule there was potential to win. Fact of the matter unless you're Gonzaga playing in the WCC you aren't going to win them all.
I completely agree - that is why I say winnable and get 2 of those. Fact is we got none...
-
Truth is we have had multiple opportunities this season to take control of our destiny by winning very 'winnable' games - win 2 of those and the season is in a completely different place.
- Pitt, Seton Hall 1, Butler 1, Providence 1, St Johns 1
The loss at Butler was one were MU ran into a buzzsaw in the 2nd half. Yes, they blew a big lead but they're not a better team than Butler. Providence was 50/50. St. John's just flat-out beat MU.
Pitt and Seton Hall were games that MU cannot lose given the way they played out (a big lead vs below average team and a crumble in the final minute). If MU was 17-7 overall and 7-5 in the BE, they'd be sitting pretty. As it stands now, they've got their work cut out for them. Let's hope that the inability to rebound a missed FT doesn't keep MU from dancing.
-
Butler may have been the best team remaining on the schedule, but it wasn't the toughest game.
According to RPI Wizard, MU's odds of beating Butler were 51%. They have a 31% chance of winning at Xavier, 45% at Gtown and 49% vs Creighton. MU also has 54% chance at PC and 53% chance home vs Xavier. Got to win those near 50/50 games to go dancing.
This is true but RPI Wizard doesn't account for injuries to Mo Watson and Edmond Sumner.
-
Truth is we have had multiple opportunities this season to take control of our destiny by winning very 'winnable' games - win 2 of those and the season is in a completely different place.
- Pitt, Seton Hall 1, Butler 1, Providence 1, St Johns 1
I know people will argue differently but MI & WI could have been competitive as well - so opportunities lost.
I completely agree - that is why I say winnable and get 2 of those. Fact is we got none...
Well I'm not sure how you can say we got none. All of our games are opportunities. We've won 15 of them and lost 9 of them. If you want to take out the cupcakes we are 9-9 in those opportunities.
If you're just talking about close games, we are 3-4 on the season in games decided by a possession or less. Wish we were 7-0 but we couldn't get it done. But I would say we got none of our opportunities.
-
Well I'm not sure how you can say we got none. All of our games are opportunities. We've won 15 of them and lost 9 of them. If you want to take out the cupcakes we are 9-9 in those opportunities.
If you're just talking about close games, we are 3-4 on the season in games decided by a possession or less. Wish we were 7-0 but we couldn't get it done. But I would say we got none of our opportunities.
Could we have lost more games - absolutely. However, we have a better KenPom rating against all but Butler on that list (included them because of the massive 1H lead). We take care of business 2 out of those 5 games (or 2 of 6 including last night) and this team is in the drivers seat...instead of being up against the wall.
My point is that we have squandered a windfall (VU + Creighton) by not taking care of business with some marginal teams.
Ken Pom ranks For reference - MU - 35, Hall 52, Buter 23, Prov 62, Pitt 76, St J 91
-
Truth is we have had multiple opportunities this season to take control of our destiny by winning very 'winnable' games - win 2 of those and the season is in a completely different place.
- Pitt, Seton Hall 1, Butler 1, Providence 1, St Johns 1
I know people will argue differently but MI & WI could have been competitive as well - so opportunities lost.
I've kind of reached a breaking point with this team where no loss is surprising and I have less hope going into each game that we show up. At this stage they need to gel again down (similiar to VU/Creighton week) to get me excited for next year. So very relaxed.
But by the same logic we shouldn't have won the Villanova game, we were lucky to hold on at home against Seton Hall and almost blew the Fresno game. If those games had turned out differently we aren't even talking about the tournament.
-
But by the same logic we shouldn't have won the Villanova game, we were lucky to hold on at home against Seton Hall and almost blew the Fresno game. If those games had turned out differently we aren't even talking about the tournament.
Which is why I called it a windfall...in my further explanation
-
1) It's not like we have a giant home court advantage, and neither does Georgetown.
2) Is there some rule against watching tape of non-conference play that I haven't heard of or...?
3) Georgetown just struggled to beat DePaul by 3 2 games ago while we took care of them by 12 (I believe).
Gtown also just gave Nova a very good game in Philly, where he would might have lost by 50 had Nova not coasted the final 10 minutes. Hoyas will be favored by five, I would guess, and unless we hit 15 threes, will win. Hoyas can still work their way out of the first-round games and will be pumped.
-
Gtown also just gave Nova a very good game in Philly, where he would might have lost by 50 had Nova not coasted the final 10 minutes. Hoyas will be favored by five, I would guess, and unless we hit 15 threes, will win. Hoyas can still work their way out of the first-round games and will be pumped.
Lol zero percent chance they are favored by 5. Likely GT -1 or even. -2 max.
We probably have to play well to win. But I like our chances.
-
I'm thinking 8-10.
-
If MU has a 50/50 chance to win each of the next 4 games the odds of going 4 straight is 6.25 %. That is the cold reality. It is a simple calculation. Just multiply the probability of winning each game times each other and the resultant product for the 4 games is the probability that the 4 wins in a row will occur. If we had a 75/25 chance of winning each game the probability of winning 4 in a row is only about 31%. Good luck in taking that bet.
-
Per Pomeroy, it would be 10.5%. However, if we beat Georgetown, it goes up to 22.9%.
Regardless, some old Jim Carrey line comes to mind...
-
Per Pomeroy, it would be 10.5%. However, if we beat Georgetown, it goes up to 22.9%.
Regardless, some old Jim Carrey line comes to mind...
Odds are also higher if the restriction of 4 in a row is dropped and we look at 4 out of 6, plus 5 out or 6 and 6 out of 6. Since you have the individual Pomeroy predicted win percents you may wish to calculate this probability. Another calculation that is helpful would be to calculate the probability of winning 4 out of 6 etc. and/or winning the BE tournament. Based on that result we would have a better idea of our chances of going to the Big Dance.
I must admit I do not watch Jim Carrey but I have watched Moneyball.
In any event there is always a chance for a better result and that is why the games are played. But if you are a bettor you may want to do the math.
-
Gtown also just gave Nova a very good game in Philly, where he would might have lost by 50 had Nova not coasted the final 10 minutes. Hoyas will be favored by five, I would guess, and unless we hit 15 threes, will win. Hoyas can still work their way out of the first-round games and will be pumped.
This is written as if you didn't watch the entire game and instead only glanced at the final score.
-
This is written as if you didn't watch the entire game and instead only glanced at the final score.
Probably what happened