1. Rowsey
2. Hannif
3. Fischer
1. Luke. Points, rebounds, blocks
2. Rowsey
1. Fischer
2. Rowsey
Luke
1. Fischer
2. Rowsey
Shout outs to Cheats for a good all around game and JJJ for playing within himself and having a good all around impact, but playing smart.
1. Fischer
2. Rowsey
Shout outs to Cheats for a good all around game and JJJ for playing within himself and having a good all around impact, but playing smart.
Luke, Rowsey
Luke!!!!!
Bring that effort every game kid
Luke's play in the middle forced the DePaul offense outside, and that gets him my vote.
Runner up Rowesey
Fisher, rowsey, and props to Reinhardt, was a six point game at the 5 min mark when he hit back to back triples and effectively ended it - finally- we let them stay in it waaaaaay to long - this team is so bad defensively it's funny- wasting a special offensive presence
Quote from: forgetful on February 04, 2017, 03:07:59 PM
1. Fischer
2. Rowsey
Shout outs to Cheats for a good all around game and JJJ for playing within himself and having a good all around impact, but playing smart.
Agree with the jjj statement
Luke - great all around play.
Rowsey - great shooting.
I'm giving it to Fischer. Just to piss off Sand-knit.
Fish, Rowsey
Fish/Wowsey
Fish. Game is more than scoring.
Rowsey
Props to JJ, best game he played. Seems like he finally figured out how to Value the Ball and how much it means in winning.
Midway through the 2nd half, when Rowsey scored about 10 in a row, staving off a DeP comeback, I was convinced he would be SOTG. Then the 7 blocks got me. Don't care about pissing off Mr. Sand-knit, but wonder about anyone who thinks Haani really had a better game than Luke. It was nice to see HC drain a 3, and I note that he appears to have regained his FT form (at least when it's not that close). HC and Markus went from 11 to 4, but a couple of those 4 were pretty egregious. Good minutes from Swag. Same for Matt.
1a. Fischer
1b. Rowsey
Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on February 04, 2017, 03:28:26 PM
Haanif over Luke? Lol
Ya not sure which game u watched n ur hoops iq, or lack there of has been displayed a few times. But haanif had a nice game offensively, stilla few hiccups, but he is the only one on the team that can guard a lick. Not sure if u noticed what Garrett did to Markus when hanni got a breather. Duane couldnt guard him without fouling n markus couldnt guard him at all. Haanis defense cannot be overlooked and was a major factor in my vote. Lukes was good today as well.
Big Fishy!
Luke, 7 blocks cannot be ignored.
Haanie and Rowsey tied for second. Haanie for defense and rebounding. Rowsey for scoring
Luke then Rowsey
Tough call between Rousey and Fischer, but I vote Fischer.
Nice game from Cheatham, but behind those two.
Big Fish, followed by Rowdy.
Great W. Feels so good.
Quote from: MomofMUltiples on February 04, 2017, 03:14:44 PM
I'm giving it to Fischer. Just to piss off Sand-knit.
Thats pretty silly n petty, u vote for Johnson too?
I would have no problem with Fischer or Rowsey. Both played very well.
Always good to be discussing vs the alternative
Cheatham based on out performing expectations. Rowsey next for keying two big runs with his scoring. Fisher third; very good all around.
I wouldn't complain about any of them getting it though.
Fish for great inside play and the first 7 MU points.....
I'd go with Rowsey today.
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 03:33:06 PM
Ya not sure which game u watched n ur hoops iq, or lack there of has been displayed a few times. But haanif had a nice game offensively, stilla few hiccups, but he is the only one on the team that can guard a lick. Not sure if u noticed what Garrett did to Markus when hanni got a breather. Duane couldnt guard him without fouling n markus couldnt guard him at all. Haanis defense cannot be overlooked and was a major factor in my vote. Lukes was good today as well.
Luke had 7 blocks and dominated when he got the ball in the post.
As usual it's you who doesn't watch. Cheatam driving out of control 5 more times is good offense to you?
Rowsey
Luke
Has to be a second line player after the starters went down 14-7, and the second line went on a 18-0 run by playing together and playing defense with effort. Luke was on the bench for that run, and Matt played a near perfect role player game. Rowsey by far with the 162 Orating and playing much improved defense.
Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on February 04, 2017, 04:28:09 PM
Has to be a second line player after the starters went down 14-7, and the second line went on a 18-0 run by playing together and playing defense with effort. Luke was on the bench for that run, and Matt played a near perfect role player game. Rowsey by far with the 162 Orating and playing much improved defense.
Nailed it.
Rowsey
Luke
Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on February 04, 2017, 04:28:09 PM
Has to be a second line player after the starters went down 14-7, and the second line went on a 18-0 run by playing together and playing defense with effort. Luke was on the bench for that run, and Matt played a near perfect role player game. Rowsey by far with the 162 Orating and playing much improved defense.
The stats may not show it, but they look like they play better defense as well.
I'd give it to Fischer.
But Cheatham was much more aggressive today. I am sure he was coached up a little.
1.Luke dominated the way a big man should.
2. Rowsey made his shots
3.JJJ played his role today very well
Fischer. Rebounds and Blocks. I like those.
Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on February 04, 2017, 04:26:54 PM
Luke had 7 blocks and dominated when he got the ball in the post.
As usual it's you who doesn't watch. Cheatam driving out of control 5 more times is good offense to you?
I said a few hiccups, he had two turnovers. Also, eight rebounds and four assists n made free throws. You can attack me if ud like but distorting reality is pretty weak. Member of the press?
Fischer, I like blocks
Good to have a SOTG debate again
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 05:52:51 PM
I said a few hiccups, he had two turnovers. Also, eight rebounds and four assists n made free throws. You can attack me if ud like but distorting reality is pretty weak. Member of the press?
Wocky? Topper? Pwease?
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXAlGY2bOoo/hqdefault.jpg)
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 05:52:51 PM
I said a few hiccups, he had two turnovers. Also, eight rebounds and four assists n made free throws. You can attack me if ud like but distorting reality is pretty weak. Member of the press?
Attack you? That would be you.
Because you masterbate to poor Fischer results
Which obviously has you flustered because today that is not possible
I'm going with Fisch. As much as I liked Wowsey's play, he committed a backcourt turnover once, maybe twice, down the stretch. An upperclassman needs to understand when a timeout is in order.
Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on February 04, 2017, 07:32:50 PM
Attack you? That would be you.
Because you masterbate to poor Fischer results
Which obviously has you flustered because today that is not possible
Thats some pretty vulgar talk. I Said in a number of posts i thought fisher played well. Im sorry if it upsets u i ranked him third. U attacked Cheatum n were incorrect he had some hiccups but ultimately only 2 turnovers. He also tied for team lead in rebounds as a guard, and was our best defender. Great game by cheatum, thats why i voted him second and Luke third. Close call, i respect ur opinion to put Luke above hanni.
I am absolutely opposed to Mr. Sand-knit being banned. He has an agenda, he is using alternative facts when it comes to Luke and I am half convinced he is a troll. But he isn't a bully running a topic into the ground and has never been anything other than opinionated and completely wrong, and IMO that is not enough to be banned.
Quote from: tower912 on February 04, 2017, 07:54:48 PM
I am absolutely opposed to Mr. Sand-knit being banned. He has an agenda, he is using alternative facts when it comes to Luke and I am half convinced he is a troll. But he isn't a bully running a topic into the ground and has never been anything other than opinionated and completely wrong, and IMO that is enough to be banned.
Sorry for voting him third tower, i thought kaitin was our fourth best is their outrage in that?
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 08:01:01 PM
Sorry for voting him third tower, i thought kaitin was our fourth best is their outrage in that?
No, but Fischer was the best player out there today.
You have history of bias and it is showing in this topic.
Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 04, 2017, 08:02:10 PM
No, but Fischer was the best player out there today.
You have history of bias and it is showing in this topic.
Respect ur opinion
However if u go back thru there are a hand full of voters for cheatum and rowsey too. Its not like im the only one, not by a long shot that felt rowsey n cheatum were better.
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 07:51:48 PM
Thats some pretty vulgar talk. I Said in a number of posts i thought fisher played well. Im sorry if it upsets u i ranked him third. U attacked Cheatum n were incorrect he had some hiccups but ultimately only 2 turnovers. He also tied for team lead in rebounds as a guard, and was our best defender. Great game by cheatum, thats why i voted him second and Luke third. Close call, i respect ur opinion to put Luke above hanni.
I think you should be banned simply because your grammar and spelling are atrocious. It offends my Catholic school sensibilities.
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 07:51:48 PM
Thats some pretty vulgar talk. I Said in a number of posts i thought fisher played well. Im sorry if it upsets u i ranked him third. U attacked Cheatum n were incorrect he had some hiccups but ultimately only 2 turnovers. He also tied for team lead in rebounds as a guard, and was our best defender. Great game by cheatum, thats why i voted him second and Luke third. Close call, i respect ur opinion to put Luke above hanni.
Huh?
I didn't attack him or say he had any more than 2 TOs
I simply said his offense still wasn't very good.
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 04, 2017, 08:01:01 PM
Sorry for voting him third tower, i thought kaitin was our fourth best is their outrage in that?
I'm defending your right to be wrong.
Quote from: tower912 on February 04, 2017, 07:54:48 PM
I am absolutely opposed to Mr. Sand-knit being banned. He has an agenda, he is using alternative facts when it comes to Luke and I am half convinced he is a troll. But he isn't a bully running a topic into the ground and has never been anything other than opinionated and completely wrong, and IMO that is enough to be banned.
Are you missing a not ???
Don't think he is, Newsy. He's just suggesting that the grating single-mindedness of hating on one player and promoting another hasn't yet reached Ners levels.
Luke, but wouldn't argue w Rowsey.
I love Rowsey. Kid is fun to watch. Wish he was better defensively, but he can really fill it up.
Quote from: MomofMUltiples on February 04, 2017, 09:23:57 PM
Don't think he is, Newsy. He's just suggesting that the grating single-mindedness of hating on one player and promoting another hasn't yet reached Ners levels.
Yeah, got it. Read it wrong first time.
Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 04, 2017, 09:41:51 PM
Luke, but wouldn't argue w Rowsey.
I love Rowsey. Kid is fun to watch. Wish he was better defensively, but he can really fill it up.
He's not terrible defensively. He can only be so good given his height. He has gotten better since the beginning of the year.
Rowsey, then Luke.
Quote from: MomofMUltiples on February 04, 2017, 03:14:44 PM
I'm giving it to Fischer. Just to piss off Sand-knit.
And I'm giving it to Fischer. Just because he deserved it.
I liked Haani's game today. Nice D, 15 pts, 6 reb, 4 asst, only 2 TO.
Also liked Rowsey, JJJ and Katin late. Thought Heldt played well, too.
But Fischer played like a big-time center.
Quote from: MU82 on February 04, 2017, 10:03:15 PM
And I'm giving it to Fischer. Just because he deserved it.
I liked Haani's game today. Nice D, 15 pts, 6 reb, 4 asst, only 2 TO.
Also liked Rowsey, JJJ and Katin late. Thought Heldt played well, too.
But Fischer played like a big-time center.
Luke flirted with the triple double
Luke for his overall game.
Quote from: Newsdrms on February 04, 2017, 09:18:46 PM
Are you missing a not ???
Yeah, I am missing a not. I will fix it.
Has to be Luke. Just an eraser. I missed the beginning, but it seemed he had an impact whenever he was in. Rowsey was huge, but flirting with a triple double does it for me. Heldt was also decent. Some nice dense and opportunistic buckets.
Luke or rowsey. I'll take either.
Sandknit's Luke expectations are ridiculous. Has a weird grudge. Musta gotten blown off on a date request.
Quote from: fjm on February 04, 2017, 11:55:04 PM
Luke or rowsey. I'll take either.
Sandknit's Luke expectations are ridiculous. Has a weird grudge. Musta gotten blown off on a date request.
Double mints...
I thought Rowley changed the tone of the game each time he was on the court. Hit huge shots got other guys better shots. From my perspective he turned the game. Rowsey all the way.
Luke had a great game but DePaul is a doughnut team (hole in the middle). I vote Rowsey.
Quote from: Newsdrms on February 05, 2017, 12:15:22 AM
Double mints...
Haven't seen them in at least a year, maybe two. Must be dating Badgers now.
Luke
Quote from: Lennys Tap on February 05, 2017, 07:48:00 AM
Luke had a great game but DePaul is a doughnut team (hole in the middle). I vote Rowsey.
Pomeroy agrees with Rowsey as his MVP.
I think Rowedey has the most votes, agendas all they have
An opinion cant be wrong
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 05, 2017, 10:05:25 AM
I think Rowedey has the most votes, agendas all they have
I don't think it was that you put Rowsey first. I think it was that you put Luke third combined with your well documented obsession with him
Rowsey.
Great game by Luke and I certainly love the 7 blocks... but DePaul still shot 52.5% 2FG% and scored 1.18 ppp. Heavy usage and ORtg combo for Rowsey makes him the winner.
PS....
@JBBauer612 Of all players (40% mins+) with a usage of 20%+, #mubb's Andrew Rowsey has THE BEST ORtg in the nation. #2-Markkanen, #3-Kennard
I voted Luke yesterday, but after a night sleeping on it, have changed my mind to Rowsey.
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 05, 2017, 10:07:04 AM
I don't think it was that you put Rowsey first. I think it was that you put Luke third combined with your well documented obsession with him
Would have no problem voting luke first if i felt thtats where he belonged, in fact i be very happy too
Also beleive some voters are not being veryobjective in the sense that luke has been vilified at times this year. Then when he has a decent game his supporters feel its the greatest. Jmho
Luke was better yesterday, stood and watched less and made some things happen. No where close to Rowsey tho. Imo
I'm going with either Jeron Jackson or Rowser. Fox Sports announcers continue to suck and mangle player's names.
Quote from: leever on February 05, 2017, 10:39:42 AM
I'm going with either Jeron Jackson or Rowser. Fox Sports announcers continue to suck and mangle player's names.
Ugh! Even the public address announcer at the game referred to Jujuan as "Jackson".
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 05, 2017, 10:25:34 AM
Would have no problem voting luke first if i felt thtats where he belonged, in fact i be very happy too
Also beleive some voters are not being veryobjective in the sense that luke has been vilified at times this year. Then when he has a decent game his supporters feel its the greatest. Jmho
Luke was better yesterday, stood and watched less and made some things happen. No where close to Rowsey tho. Imo
I'm a big Rowsey fan. Glad he's on the team (and for another year, too!). The man can really light it up, as he did yesterday.
But ... he also committed two idiotic fouls, and his man got by him whenever he wanted to pretty much all day long. Plus, he struggled mightily against the press as we almost let DePaul back in it.
We rail about our crappy defense all the time. Well, in addition to scoring 13 points on 6-for-8 shooting and grabbing 8 rebounds in 26 minutes, our last line of defense blocked 7 shots -- essentially erasing a potential 14 points worth of mistakes made by his teammates (and maybe a couple of his own mistakes).
But that's only a "decent" game. OK. I guess a "good" game would have been a triple-double, because good players get those all the time.
1. Luke. That was an incredible performance on both ends and his defense and rebounding were fantastic. Without a presence in the middle, it may have impacted the open 3s, the ability to drive and dish, etc. If he can continue to play like that, our ceiling is high.
2. Rowsey. He just continues to impress and improve. His defense is a little spotty (nitpicking) and at times on the press and trap his lack of size hurts him but he is really lighting it up lately. I haven't been this confident when a shot goes up from outside for a loooong time for MU. I love that he plays with an attitude as well.
3. tie between Cheatham and KR.
4...all the MU fans in attendance...way to show!
Tuesday is vital...need the w.
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 05, 2017, 10:25:34 AM
Would have no problem voting luke first if i felt thtats where he belonged, in fact i be very happy too
Also beleive some voters are not being veryobjective in the sense that luke has been vilified at times this year. Then when he has a decent game his supporters feel its the greatest. Jmho
Luke was better yesterday, stood and watched less and made some things happen. No where close to Rowsey tho. Imo
I'm one of the people that has been most critical of Luke. I have him number 1 for this game, because he played the best, period. His performance 13 pts, 8 rebounds, was good but not great. 7 blocks though is absolutely insane.
We have someone go off for 22 points nearly every game (Rowsey), but 7 blocks is a once a year type occurrence. It's also a team high for the last several years.
Someone will score 22 against Butler...no one will get 7 blocks.
Luke
Quote from: Jay Bee on February 05, 2017, 10:09:44 AM
Rowsey.
Great game by Luke and I certainly love the 7 blocks... but DePaul still shot 52.5% 2FG% and scored 1.18 ppp. Heavy usage and ORtg combo for Rowsey makes him the winner.
PS....
@JBBauer612 Of all players (40% mins+) with a usage of 20%+, #mubb's Andrew Rowsey has THE BEST ORtg in the nation. #2-Markkanen, #3-Kennard
Great stat. Also worth noting that in conference play he's leading the Big East in ORtg (147) and 3P% (
57%!!), #2 in FT% (90%) and #7 in assist rate while also minimizing turnovers (#18). Those are all-conference type #s. Kid is having himself a season. Glad he's here another year.
....or IS he??
AR2N?
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 05, 2017, 10:25:34 AM
Would have no problem voting luke first if i felt thtats where he belonged, in fact i be very happy too
Also beleive some voters are not being veryobjective in the sense that luke has been vilified at times this year. Then when he has a decent game his supporters feel its the greatest. Jmho
Luke was better yesterday, stood and watched less and made some things happen. No where close to Rowsey tho. Imo
Again, not putting Luke first and Rowsey have nothing to do with it. It was putting Luke 3rd combined with your previous statements about him. Don't want people to rag on you? Don't over obsess about and demean individual player's performances ad naseum.
Quote from: Ellenson Family Reunion on February 05, 2017, 12:06:38 PM
Great stat. Also worth noting that in conference play he's leading the Big East in ORtg (147) and 3P% (57%!!), #2 in FT% (90%) and #7 in assist rate while also minimizing turnovers (#18). Those are all-conference type #s. Kid is having himself a season. Glad he's here another year.
....or IS he??
AR2N?
Rowsey is playing really well lately. I hope he can keep it up
Finally have time to weigh in.
1. Rowsey. Big shots brought us from a 14-7 deficit to never surrendering the lead.
2. Big Fish. Big game.
3. Haani. Good to see him play well at both ends.
Let's do it again Tuesday! Go Warriors!
Fischy
We all know who my vote is.
Quote from: #UnleashRowsey on February 06, 2017, 02:13:15 AM
We all know who my vote is.
I don't. Just because you have a guy's name in your username doesn't prevent you from making an objective, rational decision. It's not politics.
Quote from: brewcity77 on February 06, 2017, 02:38:22 AM
I don't. Just because you have a guy's name in your username doesn't prevent you from making an objective, rational decision. It's not politics.
Last year he voted for Wally after every win.
Luke played great shot blocking. Rowley played great shooting. Both deserve to be SOTG.
Rowsey
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 06, 2017, 07:55:41 AM
Rowsey
I am absolutely shocked that you didn't pick Luke. Shocked, I tell you...
Late pick - Luke only has about 34 hours to brag about it. I was skiing all weekend, and only saw the second half - may have skewed my pick (I didn't see Rowsey pull us back from a crappy start), but Luke certainly put on a show in the 2nd half.
Anyhow, as has happened several times this year, there were at least 2 good choices for SOTG, and I had to pick one...even if some of you will disagree with me on it.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 06, 2017, 09:22:08 AM
Late pick - Luke only has about 34 hours to brag about it. I was skiing all weekend, and only saw the second half - may have skewed my pick (I didn't see Rowsey pull us back from a crappy start), but Luke certainly put on a show in the 2nd half.
Anyhow, as has happened several times this year, there were at least 2 good choices for SOTG, and I had to pick one...even if some of you will disagree with me on it.
Geez, Rocky, if you are in charge of picking the stud, the least you could do is watch the entire game, even if you have to record it.
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2017, 09:24:18 AM
Geez, Rocky, if you are in charge of picking the stud, the least you could do is watch the entire game, even if you have to record it.
For some reason, I can rarely bring myself to watch a game after the conclusion is already known. Just not much excitement to it if it's not live.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 06, 2017, 09:44:53 AM
For some reason, I can rarely bring myself to watch a game after the conclusion is already known. Just not much excitement to it if it's not live.
I'm with you there, which is why I went technology silent Saturday. Had I known the outcome, I probably wouldn't have even watched it. Just not the same if you can't at least get the as-live feeling.
Quote from: brewcity77 on February 06, 2017, 10:25:43 AM
I'm with you there, which is why I went technology silent Saturday. Had I known the outcome, I probably wouldn't have even watched it. Just not the same if you can't at least get the as-live feeling.
I'm sure the Nova win was an exception.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 06, 2017, 09:44:53 AM
For some reason, I can rarely bring myself to watch a game after the conclusion is already known. Just not much excitement to it if it's not live.
I totally get that, but how can you properly decide who is the stud if you don't watch the game? I demand a refund!
Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 06, 2017, 10:45:30 AM
I'm sure the Nova win was an exception.
I can rewatch events. I've rewatched the end of that multiple times. But it has to be something special like that or with a specific purpose. I've rewatched the Villanova win over UNC also, and occasionally will go back to watch specific sequences, but if I hear a score of a game I planned to watch, the odds of me watching it drop exponentially.
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2017, 10:46:57 AM
I totally get that, but how can you properly decide who is the stud if you don't watch the game? I demand a refund!
Yep, sounds reasonable to me.
Is it too late to nominate the pants Jim McIlvaine was wearing at the game?
Quote from: TSmith34 on February 06, 2017, 10:50:22 AM
Is it too late to nominate the pants Jim McIlvaine was wearing at the game?
I saw those! I am going to have to find out if there is a skirt version to add to m collection!
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2017, 11:14:43 AM
I saw those! I am going to have to find out if there is a skirt version to add to m collection!
I was on the far side of the arena so I couldn't exactly make out -- where they blue and gold splatters?
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2017, 06:59:08 AM
Last year he voted for Wally after every win.
The kangaroo kid!
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 06, 2017, 09:44:53 AM
For some reason, I can rarely bring myself to watch a game after the conclusion is already known. Just not much excitement to it if it's not live.
Totally with you here, rocky. I cannot watch a game when I know who won. For me, the drama is the main reason I watch sports, the main reason it is the only true "reality TV."
And you made the right choice, so nicely done!
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2017, 10:46:57 AM
I demand a refund!
Well, since you demanded...I've issued full refunds. Please note that your acceptance of the refund nullifies all future demands for refunds.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 06, 2017, 12:22:36 PM
Well, since you demanded...I've issued full refunds. Please note that your acceptance of the refund nullifies all future demands for refunds.
I'm going to reject this one and hold out for the class action lawsuit.
Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 06, 2017, 11:38:17 AM
Is he still Hopping or did he Land?
Wally is playing for the Windsor Express of the Canadian basketball league.
Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 06, 2017, 12:35:03 PM
Wally is playing for the Windsor Express of the Canadian basketball league.
Thanks Doc. Is that close to Henry?
Quote from: Loose Cannon on February 06, 2017, 12:40:15 PM
Thanks Doc. Is that close to Henry?
Yes, they are both making a living in the Detroit Windor metropolitan area.
Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 06, 2017, 12:44:03 PM
Yes, they are both making a living in the Detroit Windor metropolitan area.
Thanks again.
Great Call on Luke as DePaul SOTG. Luke is an important element of our success this year.
Rowsey
Quote from: Mr. Sand-Knit on February 06, 2017, 09:11:54 PM
Rowsey
I can picture you with a sign:
#notmySOG
Maybe you can organize a march...
Quote from: Da 'Lanche on February 06, 2017, 09:20:54 PM
I can picture you with a sign:
#notmySOG
Maybe you can organize a march...
His protest signs would have a bunch of misspelled words and inconsistent capitalization.
Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on February 06, 2017, 09:32:12 PM
His protest signs would have a bunch of misspelled words and inconsistent capitalization.
(http://s3.amazonaws.com/liberalamerica/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/gal-teabonics-20-jpg.jpg)