MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: DoubleMU0609 on November 27, 2007, 08:43:58 PM

Title: Duke v. WI
Post by: DoubleMU0609 on November 27, 2007, 08:43:58 PM
Duke up 36 - 18 with 6:31 left in the first.

;D Ha Ha ;D
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MonsterWebWarrior on November 27, 2007, 08:47:53 PM
I would have put money on neither team picking up a foul today with both Coach K and Bo Ryan in the same house.

Some of these calls going against duke are unbelievable.  It's like the refs are calling it against them because they're up 18 so they can say they're not showing favoritism.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: 🏀 on November 27, 2007, 08:53:46 PM
Wow, Wisky is getting blown out of the water by Duke. Doesn't look like they can even keep with with them.

Depending on the flow of the game allowed by the stripes, we can easily do the same thing.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: muwarrior87 on November 27, 2007, 09:06:48 PM
I hope marquette is paying attention to this game.  Duke is pushing them way out making them start the offense a lot deeper than they want to.  Completely disrupting UW's offense with their quickness and running the court very well. All things that MU can take into Madison and use to beat them.  As long as we don't get into foul trouble early, we could be in this same situation.

I like how the Grinch is so pissed every time UW gets called for a foul...gets a taste of his own medicine and what his opponents get to feel from him being in referees' ears.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MUEng92 on November 27, 2007, 09:08:42 PM
8-11 3pt shooting isn't hurting Duke either.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: 🏀 on November 27, 2007, 09:12:43 PM
8-11 3pt shooting isn't hurting Duke either.

I'd say at least 8 of those were almost wide open.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: pitz on November 27, 2007, 09:14:04 PM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: TallTitan34 on November 27, 2007, 09:18:32 PM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o

I'd include the coaches in that statement.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: 🏀 on November 27, 2007, 09:20:39 PM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o

I'd include the coaches in that statement.

I'd include sideline reporter Doris Burke in that statement.

Damn...her name is even ugly.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MonsterWebWarrior on November 27, 2007, 09:32:26 PM
I hope marquette is paying attention to this game.  Duke is pushing them way out making them start the offense a lot deeper than they want to.  Completely disrupting UW's offense with their quickness and running the court very well. All things that MU can take into Madison and use to beat them.  As long as we don't get into foul trouble early, we could be in this same situation.

Duke also has just enough big guys to neutralize the Badgers size, which we obviously don't have.  That's what I'm most nervous about.  But if we can play with the same kind of intensity that we did against OSU and Duke, we should be in good shape.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Frozen Caveman Coach on November 27, 2007, 09:49:03 PM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o

I'd include the coaches in that statement.

Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Mayor McCheese on November 27, 2007, 09:53:39 PM
Tom Crean take notes... PRESS WISCONSIN!
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: greenman on November 27, 2007, 10:01:29 PM
"Duke also has just enough big guys to neutralize the Badgers size, which we obviously don't have. "

Just saw a stat on tv about 7 min left in the second half that says guys over 6'9'' 5 for uw, 1 for duke.

how many guys do we have over 6'9''?
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: muwarrior87 on November 27, 2007, 10:10:05 PM
I hope marquette is paying attention to this game.  Duke is pushing them way out making them start the offense a lot deeper than they want to.  Completely disrupting UW's offense with their quickness and running the court very well. All things that MU can take into Madison and use to beat them.  As long as we don't get into foul trouble early, we could be in this same situation.

Duke also has just enough big guys to neutralize the Badgers size, which we obviously don't have.  That's what I'm most nervous about.  But if we can play with the same kind of intensity that we did against OSU and Duke, we should be in good shape.

Duke has one player of 6'9"...how many do we have?
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Thomas' Danish Delight on November 27, 2007, 10:12:20 PM
1, Barro at 6'10" 
Fitz is 6'9"
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: muwarrior87 on November 27, 2007, 10:13:10 PM
exactly
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MonsterWebWarrior on November 27, 2007, 10:31:34 PM
Well I don't want to get into a silly argument, but I was referring to Duke's 7' 1" and their 6' 8" guys that were actually playing underneath.  They were disrupting Wisconsin's bigs in the first half and wouldn't allow them to get going.  I only said they had "just enough".
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: muwarrior87 on November 27, 2007, 10:35:16 PM
i'll give you that.

our players do have experience playing against bigger guys and defending them well also though. We'll have to see how it pans out next weekend.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Eye on November 27, 2007, 11:39:25 PM
Technical foul on PTM.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on November 27, 2007, 11:45:28 PM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o

I'd include the coaches in that statement.

Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger.

OUR?  Are you having some identity problems
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 28, 2007, 12:10:57 AM
The key to beating WI is for them not to get settled in a half-court game. Duke was relentless on the D and spread the floor out on offense.

Let those big guys (Butcher, Krappyhoft) get settled and it's going to be foulsville in the blocks and Wisconsin Red all the way.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Pakuni on November 28, 2007, 12:46:47 AM
Well I don't want to get into a silly argument, but I was referring to Duke's 7' 1" and their 6' 8" guys that were actually playing underneath.  They were disrupting Wisconsin's bigs in the first half and wouldn't allow them to get going.  I only said they had "just enough".

Duke's 7'1" guy, Brian Zoubek, played seven minutes tonight. Their other big man, Lance Thomas, played 13 minutes (during which he was called for four fouls).

As has been said before, the key Dec. 8 is going to be MU's ability/inability to run Bucky out of the building.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: ecompt on November 28, 2007, 07:58:55 AM
Again, it's going to go down to how the game is called. Jerel has to be smart in the first five minutes. Bo kisses the zebras' butts during pregame and lets them know how he wants it called. If it's Duke-type officiating and the refs fall for the Badgers' flops into the front row, we have NO chance. I fear the Badgers will be in the bonus with eight minutes left in the first half. If that doesn't happen, we have a chance.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Big Papi on November 28, 2007, 09:39:46 AM
While we definitely can't afford to have McNeal get in foul trouble, the two key players in our matchup will be Hughes and Barro.  We need Barro to at least try to neutralize there bigs and UW needs Hughes because they will get manhandled when the ball is not in his hands.  Unfortunately, I see Barro getting the short end of the stick on this one.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: tonyreeder on November 28, 2007, 10:16:35 AM
"Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger."

Had the Duke-Mu game on over Thanksgiving at my parent's house and my Mom starts watching the game (not quite the fan I am but knows who Tom Crean is) and asks "Did Marquette get a different coach?  That can't be the same guy, he's so tan!"   He really does need to lay off the sun/tanning booth because his current hue is some sort of orangish/yellow. It does not look healthy.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MarquetteDano on November 28, 2007, 10:19:30 AM
I don't think I have ever seen so many ugly players on the court at one time :o

I'd include the coaches in that statement.

Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger.


Hmm... jesuit with a small "j".  I think Chicos is onto something.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on November 28, 2007, 11:55:20 AM
"Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger."

Had the Duke-Mu game on over Thanksgiving at my parent's house and my Mom starts watching the game (not quite the fan I am but knows who Tom Crean is) and asks "Did Marquette get a different coach?  That can't be the same guy, he's so tan!"   He really does need to lay off the sun/tanning booth because his current hue is some sort of orangish/yellow. It does not look healthy.

I've never seen so many people concerned about skin color then MU and UW@Madison fans....it's perplexing.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: tonyreeder on November 28, 2007, 12:21:38 PM
He can fry himself until he's a deep purple as far as I'm concerned.  I really don't care aside from the fact I think it's extraordinarily stupid on his part.  Skin cancer is probably not much fun. 
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Frozen Caveman Coach on November 28, 2007, 01:18:18 PM
My comment was directed more toward the short sleeved golf wind breaker he was wearing.  While I find him to be a little dorky, I am more concerned about what he does from tip off until the final buzzer.  I think his coaching during the game requires the most work of all the facets of the job.  He doesn't have the instincts that the great ones do.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Canned Goods n Ammo on November 28, 2007, 01:24:24 PM
My comment was directed more toward the short sleeved golf wind breaker he was wearing.  While I find him to be a little dorky, I am more concerned about what he does from tip off until the final buzzer.  I think his coaching during the game requires the most work of all the facets of the job.  He doesn't have the instincts that the great ones do.

I agree that I don't care how dorky he looks, but I think his job requires a TON more than X and O's during a game.

Coaches are in charge or recruiting, mentoring players, game planning, scheduling (somewhat), some of the PR and marketing (especially in Crean's case), etc.

I do think that X and O's are extremely important, but I don't think that is the "most work" or even the "most important"... I think in the college ranks coaches are asked to be so many things... and each thing is important in it's own way.



Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: HarveysWallbangers on November 28, 2007, 01:32:39 PM
He doesn't have the instincts that the great ones do.

I don't know, but could that be...as has been pointed out on this board before... because he never played basketball?
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: rocky_warrior on November 28, 2007, 02:19:48 PM
Not to sound like too much of a Crean adorer, but I'm not sure I agree with those that think his X's and O's are so bad.

Somehow, over the past few years, he's been able to beat teams coached by Krzyzewski, Pitino, Calhoun, (even Knight).  Many of those wins came against teams with arguably more talent (as far as talent rankings go), so his coaching, game prep, and in-game coaching can't be all bad.

I don't know what instincts you think he's missing - let's face it, no coaches these days have the instincts that Al had - but he seems to be pretty good at getting W's.

Now, he does need to to get a few Ws in the tournament.  But it's not like he hasn't done that before.  I think that lack of success recently has more to do with the players being inexperienced than Crean's coaching.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: MarquetteDano on November 28, 2007, 02:41:08 PM
It's funny, some say Crean can't recruit bigs.  Some say is he as great promoter and recruiter but can't coach.  As always, I think the truth lies somewhere in between.

Crean is a good recruiter.  He has a good eye for under-valued talent, though doesn't always land the post guys (certainly a weakness).

Crean is a pretty good X and O coach.  Like his recruiting, it can be improved.  But, he has knocked off at least 3-4 teams each year with supposedly better X and O coaching and more talent.

This year and last is an interesting study.  With average bigs, we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams in the country, using tempo-free stats.  However, we are not giving up a lot of transition points, which most good offensive rebounding teams do.  That is good X and O's, period.

On other hand, it appears sometimes Crean's sets are overly complex as players don't know where they should be, and he is yelling the plays as the play clock winds down.

There is definitely room for improvement in both recruting and "coaching" but it seems to be pretty solid on both counts to me.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: WashDCWarrior on November 28, 2007, 02:56:12 PM
Actually, Xs and Os is the biggest area in which Crean's improved since he's been at MU.  Even in 2003, he made a number of questionable to bad decisions in terms of offense, defense, substitution patterns, etc..  It drove me nuts to watch.  At Wednesday's Duke game, I can't think of one bad coaching move he made.  Please jump in if you can think of one.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: spiral97 on November 28, 2007, 03:04:08 PM
I agree that he has become better over the years.  I also agree he is a pretty good X/O coach.  I do not agree that no mistakes were made in the Duke game..

The biggest mistake was one he admitted himself: not being more vocal to the refs about the fouls that were getting called.  If your kid pees on the wall of your living room and you don't even yell at him for it, do you think he'll refrain from doing it again in the near future?

Other things I personally would consider mistakes have to do with substitutions at certain points in the game but those are really subjective and probably more about hindsight being 20/20.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: rocky_warrior on November 28, 2007, 03:08:09 PM
At Wednesday's Duke game, I can't think of one bad coaching move he made.  Please jump in if you can think of one.

Well the one that immediately comes to me is the one he admitted - not jumping on the refs about the way fouls were going.  He should have been going apecrap.  It may not have helped, but I don't think it could have hurt (unless he got thrown out of the game).

(whoops, I see spiral beat me to it...)
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: WashDCWarrior on November 28, 2007, 03:10:51 PM
I'll totally agree that he should have been all over the refs.  I just don't consider that Xs and Os.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: rocky_warrior on November 28, 2007, 03:29:05 PM
Agreed - but is a coaching move. :)
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: ecompt on November 28, 2007, 03:43:32 PM
I think ragging on the refs when you're playing Duke or at UW is pointless. You're not going to win those arguments; all you're doing is giving the opponent two free throws. 
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: WashDCWarrior on November 28, 2007, 03:48:23 PM
I wouldn't have minded Crean getting T'd up in that game.  The foul differential in the first half was 10-3.  That would be worth pointing out to the officials.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: DoubleMU0609 on November 28, 2007, 08:03:26 PM
If your kid pees on the wall of your living room

Is this what I have to look forward to when I eventually have a few kids???
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: spiral97 on November 28, 2007, 08:22:38 PM
not sure.. my daughter is only 5 weeks old so she doesn't know how to take the diaper off yet.. but if she does, I'll guarantee you I'll be T'd.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: ZiggysFryBoy on November 28, 2007, 09:51:18 PM
not sure.. my daughter is only 5 weeks old so she doesn't know how to take the diaper off yet.. but if she does, I'll guarantee you I'll be T'd.

just wait until she can reach down by her butt when you are changing a poopy diaper and she puts her hands in it and then gets them up to her mouth/hair faster than you can react (at least at dad speed.  I think moms are faster/less paralyzed by poopy diapers in general.)  :)
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: spiral97 on November 28, 2007, 09:57:31 PM
not sure.. my daughter is only 5 weeks old so she doesn't know how to take the diaper off yet.. but if she does, I'll guarantee you I'll be T'd.

just wait until she can reach down by her butt when you are changing a poopy diaper and she puts her hands in it and then gets them up to her mouth/hair faster than you can react (at least at dad speed.  I think moms are faster/less paralyzed by poopy diapers in general.)  :)

won't happen now that I have warning.. honey? we need to guy buy some duct tape!
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: chefrad on November 29, 2007, 03:02:33 PM
  mufanatic: "We need Barro to at least try to neutralize their bigs"

Their bigs seem to neutralize themselves without any help from anyone.
Title: Re: Duke v. WI
Post by: Eye on November 30, 2007, 02:57:58 AM
"Nice jesuit values!  Our coach is no GQ model, especially in Maui, and is 20 years younger."

Had the Duke-Mu game on over Thanksgiving at my parent's house and my Mom starts watching the game (not quite the fan I am but knows who Tom Crean is) and asks "Did Marquette get a different coach?  That can't be the same guy, he's so tan!"   He really does need to lay off the sun/tanning booth because his current hue is some sort of orangish/yellow. It does not look healthy.

I've never seen so many people concerned about skin color then MU and UW@Madison fans....it's perplexing.

But at least MU didn't have to get creative with Photoshop to prove it!