MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:48:21 PM

Title: no nit
Post by: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:48:21 PM
Marquette or Indiana didn't make the field.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: robmufan on March 16, 2014, 07:49:11 PM
at least we don't have to worry about turning the bid down now!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 07:49:22 PM
Buzz Williams. We salute you!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: WarhawkWarrior on March 16, 2014, 07:49:40 PM
Done!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Wojo'sMojo on March 16, 2014, 07:50:59 PM
Lol, this is great! I wonder if the CBI is gonna send us an offer smh ::) I would think we would want to turn that down??
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:51:29 PM
Disappointing
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: 77ncaachamps on March 16, 2014, 07:52:02 PM
I had a bad feeling about this.

Especially with all of the top conf teams dropping.

I hope these seniors and underclassmen fully understand why winning games during the regular season matters.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:52:47 PM
Quote from: mubuzz on March 16, 2014, 07:50:59 PM
Lol, this is great! I wonder if the CBI is gonna send us an offer smh ::) I would think we would want to turn that down??

You have to pay to be in the CBI.


Good thing is that we have a new event to pass up Keefe's most embarrassing moment in Marquette history....coming off 9 straight NCAA appearances including Sweet 16 Sweet 16 Elite 8, picked to win the conference and we don't even make the NIT. 

Title: Re: no nit
Post by: WarriorFan on March 16, 2014, 07:53:36 PM
No Respect.
Georgetown picked ahead of us despite losing record in conference.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: wardle2wade on March 16, 2014, 07:54:00 PM
Wow, apologies.  I thought MU was a lock even when a dozen conf winners got in.  Guess that 4-game losing streak was a bad way to go out.  
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: 79Warrior on March 16, 2014, 07:54:04 PM
Quote from: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:51:29 PM
Disappointing

Very disappointing. Can't even make the also ran tournament.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Eldon on March 16, 2014, 07:54:33 PM
Quote from: WarriorFan on March 16, 2014, 07:53:36 PM
No Respect.
Georgetown picked ahead of us despite losing record in conference.

Gtown had great OOC wins.  We had zero.  Plus, they beat Creighton.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:54:46 PM
Quote from: WarriorFan on March 16, 2014, 07:53:36 PM
No Respect.
Georgetown picked ahead of us despite losing record in conference.

They beat Michigan State, Creighton, etc....we beat no one all year long
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: spartan3186 on March 16, 2014, 07:55:16 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:54:46 PM
They beat Michigan State, Creighton, etc....we beat no one all year long

We beat Georgetown.... twice.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: mu-rara on March 16, 2014, 07:55:35 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:52:47 PM
You have to pay to be in the CBI.


Good thing is that we have a new event to pass up Keefe's most embarrassing moment in Marquette history....coming off 9 straight NCAA appearances including Sweet 16 Sweet 16 Elite 8, picked to win the conference and we don't even make the NIT. 


We all know how happy this makes you.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 16, 2014, 07:56:04 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:54:46 PM
They beat Michigan State, Creighton, etc....we beat no one all year long

But they did bow out in the first round of the Big East Tournament to DePaul!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: warriorchick on March 16, 2014, 07:56:38 PM
I blame Vander.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 16, 2014, 07:57:34 PM
Man, I really wanted to see a game in the AL
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:57:42 PM
Someone laughed at me six weeks ago when I said it's hard to get into the nit, because of the auto bids to regular season conference winners.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:57:45 PM
Quote from: mu-rara on March 16, 2014, 07:55:35 PM
We all know how happy this makes you.

Doesn't make me happy at all.....you want to keep things going.  Keep the program going. 

I am thinking about readjusting my 5 year coaching evaluation to 6 years, however. 
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:59:34 PM
Quote from: spartan3186 on March 16, 2014, 07:55:16 PM
We beat Georgetown.... twice.

Yup, doesn't matter.  IU beat Michigan and Wisconsin...we lost to Wisconsin, does that mean if it came down to IU and MU that IU should have gone?  They are never going to look at it head to head like that.  They're going to look at the entire enchilada.  Georgetown had better power numbers than we did. 

G'Town was 69 RPI
Marquette was 92

End of story
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 16, 2014, 07:59:52 PM
Quote from: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 07:57:42 PM
Someone laughed at me six weeks ago when I said it's hard to get into the nit, because of the auto bids to regular season conference winners.

Those same people probably think its easy to catch a bat in the Bradley Center.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:57:45 PM
Doesn't make me happy at all.....you want to keep things going.  Keep the program going. 

I am thinking about readjusting my 5 year coaching evaluation to 6 years, however. 

Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: chapman on March 16, 2014, 08:00:11 PM
Quote from: WarriorFan on March 16, 2014, 07:53:36 PM
No Respect.
Georgetown picked ahead of us despite losing record in conference.

Georgetown was #4 in the NCAA's pecking order, of course they're ahead of us.  They have beaten a top 25 team during the regular season in the past 376 days, and they played zero 300+ RPI buy games to our five.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 08:00:31 PM
No Indiana,  UNLV, Boise State, Ohio, Maryland, Richmond.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: WarriorGreg1965 on March 16, 2014, 08:01:05 PM
To not even make the NIT?

Disgraceful.

This team was certainly lacking in elite talent, but they had enough ability to be an NIT team, for God's sake.

Buzz deserves any criticism he gets for this debacle.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: GB Warrior on March 16, 2014, 08:01:50 PM
Consolation - an interview with the NIT selection committee mentioned us 5th of the teams to just miss the cut.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Class71 on March 16, 2014, 08:02:32 PM
A sad day my friends for all. We have been good winners. Now let's see if we can be good losers, learn and rebuild next year.  :'(

On a side note Marquette plays BB to make money. Doubt we will pay to be in a post season tourney such as CBI but I would still like to see them play.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 16, 2014, 08:03:16 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:59:34 PM
Yup, doesn't matter.  IU beat Michigan and Wisconsin...we lost to Wisconsin, does that mean if it came down to IU and MU that IU should have gone?  They are never going to look at it head to head like that.  They're going to look at the entire enchilada.  Georgetown had better power numbers than we did. 

G'Town was 69 RPI
Marquette was 92

End of story

NIT chair just said they DO NOT use RPI.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: SuddenSam on March 16, 2014, 08:03:44 PM
Got what we deserved there, in the end.  Bad season, we deserved it:(

Lesson learned?  I'm hoping!!!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: WarriorGreg1965 on March 16, 2014, 08:08:07 PM
The positive of this is that it truly is an embarrassment and hopefully it will get the attention of Buzz and convince him to change some things and to become a better coach.

Will this have any effect on recruiting?
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 08:08:17 PM
Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 16, 2014, 08:03:16 PM
NIT chair just said they DO NOT use RPI.

Understand that, I was giving it as a reference in power numbers.  Did so the last few weeks to show how teams around MU did not make the NIT, while some did.  The NIT is make up of a small committee.  You can use other power index numbers if you want. 

MU trailed G'Town in all of them  RPI, Sagarin, BPI, Ken Pom
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: MU82 on March 16, 2014, 08:10:10 PM
I am not embarrassed. This is not "disgraceful." It's sports, not real life.

Indiana was No. 1 much of last season and didn't make the NIT, either. Crap happens.

I would have watched us play in the NIT, but I'm glad we're not going to the other tournaments.

Our season is mercifully over. See y'all in October!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: chapman on March 16, 2014, 08:10:42 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:52:47 PM
You have to pay to be in the CBI.

Good money that could be used to bring in Grambling next year. 
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: NickelDimer on March 16, 2014, 08:10:51 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state

Uhhhh no, no they won't.  Incredibly naive thing to say
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: pbiflyer on March 16, 2014, 08:11:11 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 07:49:22 PM
Buzz Williams. We salute you!

Go away. Really, just go away. Badger troll, or are you just a plain troll?
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: GB Warrior on March 16, 2014, 08:12:18 PM
Quote from: bradley center bat on March 16, 2014, 08:00:31 PM
No Indiana,  UNLV, Boise State, Ohio, Maryland, Richmond.

Pretty disgusting to be lumped into the same territory of any of those, minus Indiana and UNLV.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: KenoshaWarrior on March 16, 2014, 08:12:32 PM
Quote from: WarriorGreg1965 on March 16, 2014, 08:08:07 PM
The positive of this is that it truly is an embarrassment and hopefully it will get the attention of Buzz and convince him to change some things and to become a better coach.

Will this have any effect on recruiting?

To be honest. I don't think recruits care.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Eldon on March 16, 2014, 08:13:12 PM
Quote from: pbiflyer on March 16, 2014, 08:11:11 PM
Go away. Really, just go away. Badger troll, or are you just a plain troll?

She's definitely not a Badger troll.  She used to make solid posts, but for some reason got really vitriolic toward Buzz.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: hairy worthen on March 16, 2014, 08:13:20 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state
Nice fan, way to support the team. Stick to volleyball commentary
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 16, 2014, 08:15:09 PM
Quote from: Class71 on March 16, 2014, 08:02:32 PM
Marquette plays BB to make money.

Who told you this? Marquette plays basketball for one reason: for the entertainment of the men and women of Scoop!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:15:22 PM
Quote from: hairyworthen on March 16, 2014, 08:13:20 PM
Nice fan, way to support the team. Stick to volleyball commentary

Ok

Will do
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: NickelDimer on March 16, 2014, 08:15:48 PM
Quote from: ElDonBDon on March 16, 2014, 08:13:12 PM
She's definitely not a Badger troll.  She used to make solid posts, but for some reason got really vitriolic toward Buzz.
It's called misery.  Miserable people direct their misery at others
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 08:16:15 PM
Quote from: chapman on March 16, 2014, 08:10:42 PM
Good money that could be used to bring in Grambling next year. 

Well played
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: MU82 on March 16, 2014, 08:17:02 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state

Oooh ... or maybe you'll be really lucky and Buzz will get hit by a truck and die a painful death! Because that's what he deserves for not going to the NCAAs for a sixth straight year and for not building upon S16-S16-E8.

You are officially ignored, you douchette.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 08:17:51 PM
Quote from: ElDonBDon on March 16, 2014, 08:13:12 PM
She's definitely not a Badger troll.  She used to make solid posts, but for some reason got really vitriolic toward Buzz.

I suspect she still will.  Just because someone takes a dig at the coach of this year's squad, does that it less solid or perhaps more truthful?  It wasn't a good year, a MAJOR disappointment.

Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 16, 2014, 08:20:07 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 08:17:51 PM
the coach of this year's squad

How about the coach of the 2005 squad??
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: WarriorGreg1965 on March 16, 2014, 08:26:37 PM
Quote from: NickelDimer on March 16, 2014, 08:10:51 PM
Uhhhh no, no they won't.  Incredibly naive thing to say

Another year like this and it's only common sense that important people will be looking at Buzz with a much more critical eye.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: NickelDimer on March 16, 2014, 08:28:28 PM
Quote from: WarriorGreg1965 on March 16, 2014, 08:26:37 PM
Another year like this and it's only common sense that important people will be looking at Buzz with a much more critical eye.

Possibly, but there's no chance he will be "looking at real estate listings out of state".  That's foolish talk
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: GurneeHitchkr on March 16, 2014, 08:45:37 PM
At least I won't have to listen to all of the whining on this board for a couple of months.

Looking forward to next year.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: madtownwarrior on March 16, 2014, 08:48:03 PM
if another 15 loss season next year,why would that be a foolish statement?

Quote from: NickelDimer on March 16, 2014, 08:28:28 PM
Possibly, but there's no chance he will be "looking at real estate listings out of state".  That's foolish talk
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 16, 2014, 08:52:08 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state


edit:  uh, no
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: jesmu84 on March 16, 2014, 09:20:44 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 07:57:45 PM
Doesn't make me happy at all.....you want to keep things going.  Keep the program going. 

I am thinking about readjusting my 5 year coaching evaluation to 6 years, however. 

Was this a joke? Or were you being serious here?
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 16, 2014, 09:31:49 PM
Buzz's seat at Marquette is still ice cold. If we turn in a similar season next season....it will still be cold. Three in a row might warm the seat up.

I am amazed that anyone thinks Buzz would be fired so quickly after three straight sweet 16s and an elite 8.

Buck up everyone, the future is bright!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 09:38:20 PM
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 16, 2014, 09:20:44 PM
Was this a joke? Or were you being serious here?

It was a joke, but year 6 was not a good year for Buzz...be it as a GM or a coach, major disappointment.  It happens, MU is not an exception. Every year you can rattle off how this happens to programs, but a major disappointment nonetheless.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 16, 2014, 09:42:07 PM
Quote from: chapman on March 16, 2014, 08:10:42 PM
Good money that could be used to bring in Grambling next year. 

Thanks for the laugh on a night when it was needed.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 16, 2014, 09:46:16 PM
Quote from: melissasmooth on March 16, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Repeat performance next year and buzz and his wife will be checking out real estate listings out of state

I hope Malek Harris enrolls at Marquette next year just so he can set your hair on fire.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 16, 2014, 09:48:51 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 08:17:51 PM
I suspect she still will.  Just because someone takes a dig at the coach of this year's squad, does that it less solid or perhaps more truthful?  It wasn't a good year, a MAJOR disappointment.


Why would you say that?  Suggesting that Buzz will be fired is "perhaps more truthful".  You can be a strange duck at times, sir.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: statnik on March 16, 2014, 09:49:28 PM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 16, 2014, 09:31:49 PM
Buzz's seat at Marquette is still ice cold. If we turn in a similar season next season....it will still be cold. Three in a row might warm the seat up.

I am amazed that anyone thinks Buzz would be fired so quickly after three straight sweet 16s and an elite 8.

Buck up everyone, the future is bright!

The Elite 8 run was incredibly lucky though, and I hope people realize that when considering how to judge Buzz's tenure.  It certainly signaled that the high expectations heading into this year might've been too difficult to reach, but also signaled that last year's team was not a top 10 kind of team.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Afroman on March 16, 2014, 09:52:02 PM
The start of Boot Camp is right around the corner! Here's an idea -- next season, scrap the boot camp and have a free throw camp or perimeter jumper camp.
Ring Out Ahoya!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 16, 2014, 09:53:08 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 16, 2014, 08:52:08 PM

edit:  uh, no

What's the deal, Rocky? They're called blood wings

(http://www.vision-strike-wear.com/assets/images/AirborneBlood.jpg)
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 09:57:30 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on March 16, 2014, 09:48:51 PM
Why would you say that?  Suggesting that Buzz will be fired is "perhaps more truthful".  You can be a strange duck at times, sir.

I didn't see where she suggested Buzz would be fired.  I was responding to El's post that at times she posts solid stuff, but not there is vitriol.  If she said he should be fired, I don't agree with it.  On the other hand, if she is challenging some of the coaching decisions, etc, this year then I don't see how that lessens here "solid posting".  Again, I didn't see where she called for his firing, but I don't read all the posts so I may have missed it.

Quack quack
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 16, 2014, 10:00:00 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 16, 2014, 09:57:30 PM
Quack quack

An odd duck would not quack. Rather, it would say, "Oink"
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Eldon on March 16, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on March 16, 2014, 09:46:16 PM
I hope Malek Harris enrolls at Marquette next year just so he can set your hair on fire.

LMAO! 

Hope she doesn't come near you, cuz you, my man, are on fire!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 16, 2014, 10:04:01 PM
Quote from: statnik on March 16, 2014, 09:49:28 PM
The Elite 8 run was incredibly lucky though, and I hope people realize that when considering how to judge Buzz's tenure.  It certainly signaled that the high expectations heading into this year might've been too difficult to reach, but also signaled that last year's team was not a top 10 kind of team.

Lucky or not, it is an elite 8. And we were a three seed. We were expected to beat every team but Miami. I get that Davidson required a miraculous comeback, but that was after we played one of our worst games and they played one of their best.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: willie warrior on March 17, 2014, 05:30:36 AM
Hoo Boy. Not in NIT. In Buzz we trust. He be the man.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: john31 on March 17, 2014, 06:23:02 AM
Sorry, someone had to it..... Barnes to MU...........?
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on March 17, 2014, 07:09:52 AM
You have to pay to be in the CBI?

The CIT was announced on Friday before even the NCAA or NIT teams were named.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 17, 2014, 09:02:39 AM
Quote from: statnik on March 16, 2014, 09:49:28 PM
The Elite 8 run was incredibly lucky though, and I hope people realize that when considering how to judge Buzz's tenure.  It certainly signaled that the high expectations heading into this year might've been too difficult to reach, but also signaled that last year's team was not a top 10 kind of team.

No luck involved....nuance
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: NickelDimer on March 17, 2014, 09:05:46 AM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 16, 2014, 09:31:49 PM
Buzz's seat at Marquette is still ice cold. If we turn in a similar season next season....it will still be cold. Three in a row might warm the seat up.

I am amazed that anyone thinks Buzz would be fired so quickly after three straight sweet 16s and an elite 8.

Buck up everyone, the future is bright!

Correct. It's called equity, and Buzz has earned plenty of it. Ridiculous to think he'd be dismissed next year if we had a repeat of this year
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 09:14:08 AM
Quote from: LittleMurs on March 16, 2014, 09:48:51 PM
Why would you say that?  Suggesting that Buzz will be fired is "perhaps more truthful".  You can be a strange duck at times, sir.

Duck? You bought the wrong vowel.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 17, 2014, 09:17:28 AM
Quote from: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 09:14:08 AM
Duck? You bought the wrong vowel.

Awwww, someone definitely got out of the wrong side of the bed.  Maybe you can go makeup some more stuff....I hear Sherry's regional college basketball newsletter run out of her house for the wives at the moose lodge picked a team 4th....you should have used that one.

Title: Re: no nit
Post by: humanlung on March 17, 2014, 09:18:34 AM
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on March 16, 2014, 07:52:02 PM
I had a bad feeling about this.

Especially with all of the top conf teams dropping.

I hope these seniors and underclassmen fully understand why winning games during the regular season matters.

+1,000,000
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 09:36:26 AM
Quote from: statnik on March 16, 2014, 09:49:28 PM
The Elite 8 run was incredibly lucky though, and I hope people realize that when considering how to judge Buzz's tenure.  It certainly signaled that the high expectations heading into this year might've been too difficult to reach, but also signaled that last year's team was not a top 10 kind of team.

Yeah, the 14-4 Big East Championship season, 3 seed, top 10 ranking, rout of Miami, Elite 8 season was all just one pile of incredible luck. LOL
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 11:07:44 AM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 17, 2014, 09:17:28 AM
Awwww, someone definitely got out of the wrong side of the bed.  Maybe you can go makeup some more stuff....I hear Sherry's regional college basketball newsletter run out of her house for the wives at the moose lodge picked a team 4th....you should have used that one.



Wow. You are never as giddy as when you can write post after post ripping MU and Buzz and being an apologist for your real team/coach.

Must be nice in that imaginary little world of yours where a team - with 2 McDonald's AAs, college basketball's 6th man of the year and several 4 stars, picked to finish in the first division of college basketball's toughest conference by everyone and the top 28 nationally by writers and coaches - "about meets expectations, maybe a teensy, weensy bit worse" by losing 12 of 19 against Big 10 opponents, missing both the NCAA and NIT and finishing 72nd in Pomeroy and 99th in the RPI. MAJOR disappointment to every Indiana fan but you - keep slurping, your mancrush on TC is alive and well.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: willie warrior on March 17, 2014, 11:13:47 AM
Quote from: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 11:07:44 AM
Wow. You are never as giddy as when you can write post after post ripping MU and Buzz and being an apologist for your real team/coach.

Must be nice in that imaginary little world of yours where a team - with 2 McDonald's AAs, college basketball's 6th man of the year and several 4 stars, picked to finish in the first division of college basketball's toughest conference by everyone and the top 28 nationally by writers and coaches - "about meets expectations, maybe a teensy, weensy bit worse" by losing 12 of 19 against Big 10 opponents, missing both the NCAA and NIT and finishing 72nd in Pomeroy and 99th in the RPI. MAJOR disappointment to every Indiana fan but you - keep slurping, your mancrush on TC is alive and well.
Lenny--you are deflecting again. Attacking Indiana's performace of the Coach when the real issue here is the performance of the MU Coach.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 11:26:31 AM
Quote from: willie warrior on March 17, 2014, 11:13:47 AM
Lenny--you are deflecting again. Attacking Indiana's performace of the Coach when the real issue here is the performance of the MU Coach.

Not deflecting at all. I am on record as acknowledging that this season was a "major disappointment" for MU. But when Indiana fans come on here criticizing our performance and bogusly defending theirs I reserve the right to call out the obvious BS.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Spotcheck Billy on March 17, 2014, 12:26:48 PM
Quote from: MU Fan in Connecticut on March 17, 2014, 07:09:52 AM
You have to pay to be in the CBI?

The CIT was announced on Friday before even the NCAA or NIT teams were named.

Per the Wake beat writer at the Winston-Salen Journal:

Pittsburgh, while still in the Big East, played in the CBI in 2012. Paul Zeise, my new buddy from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, stopped by my computer at the Greensboro Coliseum work room to pass along that the Panthers paid $25,000 for the first round, $50,000 for the second and $75,000 for the third.

http://www.journalnow.com/sports/wfu/my_take_on_wake/from-ice-bath-to-the-cbi/article_e33c02a4-ab0d-11e3-9c3c-001a4bcf6878.html
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 18, 2014, 12:01:39 AM
Quote from: Lennys Tap on March 17, 2014, 09:14:08 AM
Duck? You bought the wrong vowel.

Or consonant?
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 18, 2014, 12:12:35 AM
Quote from: keefe on March 18, 2014, 12:01:39 AM
Or consonant?

Those are still free
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 18, 2014, 12:27:17 AM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 18, 2014, 12:12:35 AM
Those are still free

Just messin witcha Jams
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 18, 2014, 12:40:35 AM
I know....I just wish he went with the consonant, save him some dough
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: Class71 on March 18, 2014, 05:22:47 AM
Quote from: keefe on March 16, 2014, 08:15:09 PM
Who told you this? Marquette plays basketball for one reason: for the entertainment of the men and women of Scoop!

Missed that one. Season now makes sense.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: klyrish on March 19, 2014, 12:42:19 AM
Quote from: spartan3186 on March 16, 2014, 07:55:16 PM
We beat Georgetown.... twice.

Reminds me of a few years back when CU left the Big XII and, despite beating K-State 3 times that season, were totally snubbed for the NCAA tournament yet KSU made it.
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: keefe on March 19, 2014, 01:10:38 AM
Quote from: klyrish on March 19, 2014, 12:42:19 AM
Reminds me of a few years back when CU left the Big XII and, despite beating K-State 3 times that season, were totally snubbed for the NCAA tournament yet KSU made it.

Welcome back!
Title: Re: no nit
Post by: klyrish on March 19, 2014, 03:34:16 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 19, 2014, 01:10:38 AM
Welcome back!
Ha...thanks. I quickly gave up on this season back in December as I didn't need the incredible amounts of stress I allow MUBB to put on me when we're doing terribly (or, I guess, "standardly").
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev