Boston beat reporter is speculating that the following trade is on the table:
Clipper get:
Doc Rivers
Kevin Garnett
either Jason Terry or Courtney Lee
Fab Melo
Boston gets:
future first round pick
DeAndre Jordan
expiring contract of Caron Butler
THEN...
Eric Bledsoe and Blake Griffin from Clippers to Lakers for Dwight Howard
Boston also rumored to cut ties with Paul Pierce...who would likely end up with the Clippers if he is traded to another team and then dumped.
Stern loves his big markets and LA would have two solid teams. Boston is old and would be re=loading for the future. Wow.
I don't know...
The real question is can we be proud of Doc?
Why would the Clippers trade Griffin for Howard?
Quote from: TallTitan34 on June 17, 2013, 09:23:40 PM
Why would the Clippers trade Griffin for Howard?
Because Howard is a significantly better player.
You do not want Dwight Howard on your team.
Quote from: TallTitan34 on June 17, 2013, 09:29:52 PM
You do not want Dwight Howard on your team.
Oh, I didn't realize you were actually asking me why I would trade Griffin for Howard.
I also wouldn't want the Dwight Howard of the past two years on my team, but the Clips are apparently willing to gamble on the chance that Howard is able to grow out of the weird personal drama. If he does, they will be much better off than they are with Griffin.
Quote from: TallTitan34 on June 17, 2013, 09:23:40 PM
Why would the Clippers trade Griffin for Howard?
Griffin sucks.
Quote from: TallTitan34 on June 17, 2013, 09:29:52 PM
You do not want Dwight Howard on your team.
Who wants wants a Team USA center on their basketball team? They should probably get better/taller players.
Quote from: Waryours on June 17, 2013, 10:11:13 PM
Who wants wants a Team USA center on their basketball team? They should probably get better/taller players.
Actually, i followed team usa fairly closely. Rumblings out of the Coach K camp and Boeheim camp suggest he wasnt the greatest teammate... I wouldnt be surprised if Howard declines the next invite... It will be a tough decision for the staff since i think they prefer to play faster.
As a side note, K is back as head coach. he said he wouldnt coach unless he was still committed to Duke at the time of the Olympics.
Boeheim accepted assistant coaching job and he said the same thing.
Looks like both programs have their HC tied up for a few more years...
Sorry, I couldn't figure out teal from my blackberry. It was a Big Ox team USA reference.
Quote from: MUSF on June 17, 2013, 09:38:02 PM
Oh, I didn't realize you were actually asking me why I would trade Griffin for Howard.
I also wouldn't want the Dwight Howard of the past two years on my team, but the Clips are apparently willing to gamble on the chance that Howard is able to grow out of the weird personal drama. If he does, they will be much better off than they are with Griffin.
One could argue it is more than just personal problems. http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9308573/searching-dwight-howard
Wow! Coaches are being traded like players now. Think that's a bad sign for coaches...?
To be accurate, the Celtics would release him from his contract and allow him to sign with the Clippers as part of the deal. Coaches can't be traded.
And I would want neither Howard nor Griffin for the hype and/or cap space they will likely take up. But if given the choice I would take Howard over Griffin.
I'd take grif over howard.
I think Grif still has some upside if he can improve his footwork and craftiness (his primary weapon is still just being a better athlete).
Howard is still in his prime, but won't be improving. Plus, he is his own worst enemy, so I'd be nervous about that.
*Note: I don't watch a lot of NBA, so my opinion is based upon limited information and probably isn't valid.
Quote from: Guns n Ammo on June 18, 2013, 10:26:22 AM
I'd take grif over howard.
I think Grif still has some upside if he can improve his footwork and craftiness (his primary weapon is still just being a better athlete).
Howard is still in his prime, but won't be improving. Plus, he is his own worst enemy, so I'd be nervous about that.
*Note: I don't watch a lot of NBA, so my opinion is based upon limited information and probably isn't valid.
No need for this disclaimer on Scoop.
Quote from: Archies Bat on June 18, 2013, 11:59:31 AM
No need for this disclaimer on Scoop.
Maybe it should be everyone's sig.
Howard is a cancer.
Howard definitely has more talent, but I'm not sure I'd move those pieces for him.
There both athletes however Howard is a much better defensive player. Griffin does not seem to fair well in set offenses if it isnt a lob. Howard has a much higher potential but he has a much higher probability of being injured. Like the Grantland article said you can't pass on Howard if he wants to play for your team.
Quote from: Terror Skink on June 18, 2013, 10:08:49 AM
To be accurate, the Celtics would release him from his contract and allow him to sign with the Clippers as part of the deal. Coaches can't be traded.
And I would want neither Howard nor Griffin for the hype and/or cap space they will likely take up. But if given the choice I would take Howard over Griffin.
Coaches have been traded in the past. Depends what their contract says.
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 18, 2013, 01:10:04 PM
Coaches have been traded in the past. Depends what their contract says.
Whatever...in this case Doc cannot be "traded."
Quote from: PTM on June 18, 2013, 12:26:14 PM
Howard definitely has more talent, but I'm not sure I'd move those pieces for him.
Howard is a spoiled child. Mentally, he's very weak. Physically, his body is breaking down.
Quote from: Terror Skink on June 18, 2013, 01:27:27 PM
Whatever...in this case Doc cannot be "traded."
Sorry, just clarifying. It has happened a bunch in baseball over the years. I believe a handful of times in the NFL, but would need to confirm. NBA coaches have also been traded.
Quote from: Aughnanure on June 18, 2013, 12:00:51 PM
They both suck.
Neither of them "suck." Both have specific talents that have been valuable and can continue to be valuable.
Howard sucks so much that he absolutely carried an otherwise mediocre Orlando team to the 2009 NBA Finals. I mean, unless you think Hedo Turkoglu, Rashard Lewis and Courtney Lee were superstars. (Jameer Nelson was hurt and didn't even play the first three rounds.)
In recent seasons, however, Howard has become a spoiled coach-killer and a bad teammate. He also has become injury-prone after being an ironman earlier in his career. Still, he's not even 28 years old and it sure would be tempting to want him as a defensive force, rebounder and occasional 20-point man -- if the right coach can convince him that's what he is. (Not sure that coach is out there.)
Griffin is a different type of beast. He already has lots of skills and appears to have a higher ceiling. He has shown a willingness to work, improving his outside shooting and free-throw shooting, he is only 24 and he has a chance to be a Mailman-type forward as he matures into more than just a dunking machine. Note that I said "has a chance" and "Mailman-type." Not predicting he'll be the next Mailman. He also seems to be a much better team player.
At this point in their careers, I think I'd take Griffin over Howard in a trade, especially if I could get back some extra pieces that would make Griffin a better role player.
I wouldn't want either Griffin or Howard on my team. If you look at Griffin's numbers you will see that he as gotten worse every season he has been in the NBA. Howard's numbers also have declined every season since he went to the Finals. If I was forced to choose one, I would pick howard because of his ability to anchor a defense. Griffin is a special athlete, but that is about it... unless he learns an ofensive move other than a dunk, he will never life up to what was expected of him after his rookie year.
Rivers getting killed out here in Boston. After the C's owners made him the highest paid coach in the game 2 years ago, with an aging roster, both sides agreed he would be here for the long haul, and help them rebuild.
Simmons intimidated that Rivers told the clips not to trade Bledsoe as a part of his deal, he wanted him as a trade asset. This won't end well for Rivers or the Celtics. Rivers is leaning toward walking away, and taking a 6 million paycut as tv money is only around a mil.
Quote from: Groin_pull on June 18, 2013, 02:02:55 PM
Howard is a spoiled child. Mentally, he's very weak. Physically, his body is breaking down.
Well, but other than that he is Superman
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 18, 2013, 02:40:18 PM
Sorry, just clarifying. It has happened a bunch in baseball over the years. I believe a handful of times in the NFL, but would need to confirm. NBA coaches have also been traded.
I know Gruden was traded by Oakland to TB for picks and Guillen was traded to Miami. Not sure if it has happened in the NBA though.
Cubs traded for Theo...lol
This really aren't trades from a legal standpoint. They may be providing compensation for hiring away a coach, but the contract isn't transferred from one team to another.
Herm Edwards was also traded from the Jets to the Chiefs, I think for a 4th round pick
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/blog/ken-berger/22491346/nba-wont-allow-rivers-clippers-swap
Coaches cannot be traded in the NBA.
Quote from: Terror Skink on June 20, 2013, 02:32:19 PM
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/blog/ken-berger/22491346/nba-wont-allow-rivers-clippers-swap
Coaches cannot be traded in the NBA.
Not anymore, has been allowed in the past under different CBAs.