MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM

Title: New Fox Sports
Post by: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
With the "new" Big East seemingly going to sign with the new Fox Sports networks we're also losing ESPN coverage. This, of course, leads to no Marquette games on ESPN3/WatchESPN, right? So does anyone know if there will be any streaming options for the new network?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: reinko on March 01, 2013, 07:55:27 AM
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
With the "new" Big East seemingly going to sign with the new Fox Sports networks we're also losing ESPN coverage. This, of course, leads to no Marquette games on ESPN3/WatchESPN, right? So does anyone know if there will be any streaming options for the new network?

Been chatted about it before, basically unsure at the moment, but methinks SOME kind of online interface will be built.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: THEbig0 on March 01, 2013, 08:53:23 AM
For me, this would be the only bad news about joining a new conference - if there wasn't an online streaming option/replay option. I absolutely love having the ability to stream most of our games and conference games, plus watching replay if I can't get it live.  From a person with no cable...
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 09:17:16 AM
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
With the "new" Big East seemingly going to sign with the new Fox Sports networks we're also losing ESPN coverage. This, of course, leads to no Marquette games on ESPN3/WatchESPN, right? So does anyone know if there will be any streaming options for the new network?

Totally depends on the deal.  Big East games currently are on MSG, SNY, MASN but also on ESPN and CBS. 

Big Ten games on the BTN, ESPN, and CBS.  Really depends on the rights and how they are bundled up.  Fox needs content for their new transitioned networks, so they'll want as much inventory as they can get.

Benny might even have to subscribe to television again to see his Warriors play.   ;D
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: muwarrior69 on March 01, 2013, 09:20:22 AM
Chicos, do you think FOX would try to get the NCAA Tournament when that contract comes up?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: jficke13 on March 01, 2013, 09:23:07 AM
Quote from: muwarrior69 on March 01, 2013, 09:20:22 AM
Chicos, do you think FOX would try to get the NCAA Tournament when that contract comes up?

Man those rights will take some scratch to buy, no doubt.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 09:27:06 AM
Quote from: muwarrior69 on March 01, 2013, 09:20:22 AM
Chicos, do you think FOX would try to get the NCAA Tournament when that contract comes up?

They tried this last time (two years ago), and that's why CBS partnered with Turner to bolster their bid which they ultimately won again.  We were involved as well since we were the first ones to put multiple games on at one time...we did that deal with Mike Aresco at CBS. 

Now that having 4 games on at once is the norm, you need the ability to deliver that to the fans which means multiple networks.  FOX could do it because of their national networks (FX, Fox Sports 1, Fox Sports 2, FOX national), but with CBS having the incumbancy I would like their chances moving forward. 

CBS doesn't want to lose the Masters, the NCAA tournament, SEC football and a few others things...that is the bread and butter.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: NavinRJohnson on March 01, 2013, 09:27:40 AM
Quote from: lawwarrior12 on March 01, 2013, 09:23:07 AM
Man those rights will take some scratch to buy, no doubt.

NFL, MLB, BCS, Daytona/NASCAR...I guess I'd be surprised if they didn't try. That's like 10 years out though, isn't it?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 09:34:27 AM
Quote from: reinko on March 01, 2013, 07:55:27 AM
Been chatted about it before, basically unsure at the moment, but methinks SOME kind of online interface will be built.

Very likely....I have a meeting with them very soon and will ask the question.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 09:42:48 AM
ESPN3 has been blacking out more games this year, so I've found it to be less useful.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MU82 on March 01, 2013, 09:45:39 AM
Quote from: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 09:42:48 AM
ESPN3 has been blacking out more games this year, so I've found it to be less useful.

Here in N.C., I got to watch every non-national-TV game on ESPN3, and I'm hoping like hell that Fox will have something similar because I've gotten spoiled.

Yes, it's all about me, me, me!!!
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: ATWizJr on March 01, 2013, 09:46:00 AM
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
With the "new" Big East seemingly going to sign with the new Fox Sports networks we're also losing ESPN coverage. This, of course, leads to no Marquette games on ESPN3/WatchESPN, right? So does anyone know if there will be any streaming options for the new network?
Source today indicated that the plan is for Fox to sell rights to some games to ESPN  and, perhaps, CBS.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: GOO on March 01, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
Quote from: BW221 on March 01, 2013, 08:53:23 AM
For me, this would be the only bad news about joining a new conference - if there wasn't an online streaming option/replay option. I absolutely love having the ability to stream most of our games and conference games, plus watching replay if I can't get it live.  From a person with no cable...

How do you do this?  I don't have cable, but didn't know there is a streaming option (at least on ESPN) without having cable....?
I've gone back to antenna TV and netflix/apple tv.  We really like it, except for no ESPN.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUfan12 on March 01, 2013, 09:49:07 AM
Quote from: ATWizJr on March 01, 2013, 09:46:00 AM
Source today indicated that the plan is for Fox to sell rights to some games to ESPN  and, perhaps, CBS.

Not only that, I'd assume some games will end up on their regional networks.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 09:55:49 AM
Quote from: GOO on March 01, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
How do you do this?  I don't have cable, but didn't know there is a streaming option (at least on ESPN) without having cable....?
I've gone back to antenna TV and netflix/apple tv.  We really like it, except for no ESPN.

I don't have cable either, and ESPN3 has been sporadic this year.  Sometimes games were available, and sometimes they required a log-in from your cable company to watch games.  Besides the TWC32 black-outs, ESPN3 was blocking games on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU as well.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUMountin on March 01, 2013, 09:56:37 AM
Quote from: GOO on March 01, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
How do you do this?  I don't have cable, but didn't know there is a streaming option (at least on ESPN) without having cable....?
I've gone back to antenna TV and netflix/apple tv.  We really like it, except for no ESPN.

It depends on your internet provider--if your internet is through a company that subscribes to ESPN3, then you can get it, regardless of whether you have cable or not.  Usually when you try to stream a game, it will ask for which provider you have.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: We R Final Four on March 01, 2013, 10:20:07 AM
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 01, 2013, 07:52:09 AM
With the "new" Big East seemingly going to sign with the new Fox Sports networks we're also losing ESPN coverage. This, of course, leads to no Marquette games on ESPN3/WatchESPN, right? So does anyone know if there will be any streaming options for the new network?

Anyone know how will this deal affect local ESPN 540?  I think am 920 which now carries Jay Mohr-(who is great BTW) recently changed to Fox Sports.

540 currently carries everything that is MU and Buzz ( 2 1/2 hr pre-games, Buzz hour, games, post-games) and doesn't hate on the above mentioned. I think that would all change, right?

Does Homer still do the games being an employee of ESPN?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: keefe on March 01, 2013, 10:22:55 AM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 09:27:06 AM
we were the first ones to put multiple games on at one time...

Isn't that the $100 package you guys used to sell??
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Benny B on March 01, 2013, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: GOO on March 01, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
How do you do this?  I don't have cable, but didn't know there is a streaming option (at least on ESPN) without having cable....?
I've gone back to antenna TV and netflix/apple tv.  We really like it, except for no ESPN.

1. You "borrow" a login from a buddy who is a TW, Xfinity, or Brighthouse subscriber and watch everything on WatchESPN.com.

2. Place-shifting technology like Slingbox (though not sure if this even exists anymore)

3. Break into your neighbor's house while they're gone.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: keefe on March 01, 2013, 10:31:08 AM
Quote from: Benny B on March 01, 2013, 10:25:00 AM
1. You "borrow" a login from a buddy who is a TW, Xfinity, or Brighthouse subscriber and watch everything on WatchESPN.com.

2. Place-shifting technology like Slingbox (though not sure if this even exists anymore)

3. Break into your neighbor's house while they're gone.

4. Go to a nearby Sports Bar, drink some IPA and slip the bar tender a $20 to put the Marquette game on the Big Screen. It works. I've done it.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 10:33:14 AM
Quote from: We R Final Four on March 01, 2013, 10:20:07 AM
Anyone know how will this deal affect local ESPN 540?  I think am 920 which now carries Jay Mohr-(who is great BTW) recently changed to Fox Sports.

540 currently carries everything that is MU and Buzz ( 2 1/2 hr pre-games, Buzz hour, games, post-games) and doesn't hate on the above mentioned. I think that would all change, right?

Does Homer still do the games being an employee of ESPN?

I believe radio rights are negotiated separately. It is not a huge market for radio but just look at other sports on ESPN, they broadcast the radio coverage of a lot of NFL games but only have broadcast rights to MNF. Out here in DC ESPN affiliates do the Redskins and Ravens games and unfortunately on Monday mornings a local Redskins program takes place of Mike & Mike.

If FOX has an extensive enough radio property, not sure if they do, maybe they make a play for that as well, but I would expect little change in who carries radio broadcasts now if they do not.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 10:37:56 AM
Quote from: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 09:55:49 AM
I don't have cable either, and ESPN3 has been sporadic this year.  Sometimes games were available, and sometimes they required a log-in from your cable company to watch games.  Besides the TWC32 black-outs, ESPN3 was blocking games on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU as well.

That is pretty much standard procedures. If the game is on one of their national networks they are not going to let you see it online, they want you to watch the actual channel.

This type of problem probably won't go away even if Fox has online streaming. If the game is being televised on Fox Sports 1 or 2 it is likely to be blacked out from being able to be streamed.

Also, if we are the only college basketball property they get the vast majority of games would be on the TV channels. The only time I see MASN, SKy, ets.. getting games are on weekends or nights where more than one game is going on.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: bkooncy on March 01, 2013, 10:47:34 AM
Quote from: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 10:37:56 AM
That is pretty much standard procedures. If the game is on one of their national networks they are not going to let you see it online, they want you to watch the actual channel.

This type of problem probably won't go away even if Fox has online streaming. If the game is being televised on Fox Sports 1 or 2 it is likely to be blacked out from being able to be streamed.

Also, if we are the only college basketball property they get the vast majority of games would be on the TV channels. The only time I see MASN, SKy, ets.. getting games are on weekends or nights where more than one game is going on.

IF the game is on national tv, but your internet company is a subscriber to Watch Espn then you are able to use the watch espn app to view the game on Espn, Espn2 or EspnU.  If your internet company isn't then you are out of luck. 
Marquette should be one of the premier teams in the NEW Big East, therefore hopefully most of our conference games will be broadcast nation wide on foxsports1 or 2.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: shoothoops on March 01, 2013, 10:51:08 AM
Another thing that will be important to some people is the tier of Speed Channel and Fuel Channel.  These are the two current channels that I believe will be converted into the 2 new Fox Sports channels.  They will need to be on a basic tier.  Currently, Speed Channel is not.  (on Dish and DirecTv)

As it is right now, nationally, domestically, most MU games are on easily accessible tv.  There are always a handful that aren't.  Surprisingly, one of the Georgetown games was one of those this year.  One needed to have a higher tier to watch, or use internet stream or pay for ESPN Full Court.  

The more games on easy access tv the better.  And, a good, reliable internet stream is also essential too.  

I also wish I could get more food quality internet streams Internationally as well when necessary.  

Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 11:14:43 AM
Quote from: shoothoops on March 01, 2013, 10:51:08 AM
Another thing that will be important to some people is the tier of Speed Channel and Fuel Channel.  These are the two current channels that I believe will be converted into the 2 new Fox Sports channels.  They will need to be on a basic tier.  Currently, Speed Channel is not.  (on Dish and DirecTv)

As it is right now, nationally, domestically, most MU games are on easily accessible tv.  There are always a handful that aren't.  Surprisingly, one of the Georgetown games was one of those this year.  One needed to have a higher tier to watch, or use internet stream or pay for ESPN Full Court.  

The more games on easy access tv the better.  And, a good, reliable internet stream is also essential too.  

I also wish I could get more food quality internet streams Internationally as well when necessary.  



I don't know if they would, maybe they would bump Fox Sports 1 down to basic cable, but we have had several games on ESPN U this season and in most areas ESPN requires a package above basic cable. I could easily see them keeping Fox Sports 2 as a channel you have to pay more to get. 
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 11:17:34 AM
Quote from: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 10:37:56 AM
That is pretty much standard procedures. If the game is on one of their national networks they are not going to let you see it online, they want you to watch the actual channel.

It's their standard procedure now, and I understand why, but it wasn't in the past.  They've really started cracking down this year with log-ins and blacking out more games than in previous years.  The hassle-factor for ESPN3 is increasing, so I don't see it as a big advantage for being on ESPN vs. FOX anymore.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Benny B on March 01, 2013, 11:48:17 AM
Quote from: bkooncy on March 01, 2013, 10:47:34 AM
IF the game is on national tv, but your internet company is a subscriber to Watch Espn then you are able to use the watch espn app to view the game on Espn, Espn2 or EspnU.  If your internet company isn't then you are out of luck. 
Marquette should be one of the premier teams in the NEW Big East, therefore hopefully most of our conference games will be broadcast nation wide on foxsports1 or 2.


WatchESPN is only available to cable subscribers, and then, only if your subscription includes the channel (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU) you want to watch.  ESPN3.com is available to internet-only subscribers, but ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU cannot be watched live on ESPN3.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: downtown85 on March 01, 2013, 11:55:05 AM
I hope fox comes up with something.  I live overseas and pay $25/month and so far have gotten all the games (except CBS and the GB game) through ESPN.  CBS was free and GB we all know about ($5 for that garbage).
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Spotcheck Billy on March 01, 2013, 12:08:08 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 01, 2013, 10:31:08 AM
4. Go to a nearby Sports Bar, drink some IPA and slip the bar tender a $20 to put the Marquette game on the Big Screen. It works. I've done it.

I've never had to bribe the bartender, just ask. Maybe find a different bar with less Badger fans?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: THEultimateWARRIOR on March 01, 2013, 12:25:03 PM
With Fox Sports taking over will the games be on a major tv channel like the NFL games (channels 2-8)? Or will it be on the same channel as speed, which as I recall was in the 100's.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUMonster03 on March 01, 2013, 12:28:12 PM
Quote from: THEultimateWARRIOR on March 01, 2013, 12:25:03 PM
With Fox Sports taking over will the games be on a major tv channel like the NFL games (channels 2-8)? Or will it be on the same channel as speed, which as I recall was in the 100's.

Since I don't work for Fox I can only surmise, but I believe it will be in the 100's or whereever most of your sport channels are located since it is being launched, I believe, as a cable sports channel to compete directly against ESPN. The really low numbers are usually for the channels that you can get over the air.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: THEbig0 on March 01, 2013, 12:30:33 PM
Quote from: Litehouse on March 01, 2013, 09:55:49 AM
I don't have cable either, and ESPN3 has been sporadic this year.  Sometimes games were available, and sometimes they required a log-in from your cable company to watch games.  Besides the TWC32 black-outs, ESPN3 was blocking games on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU as well.

The nicest thing for me is the replay, which has no blackouts.  About 30% of games I can't catch live, and watchESPN has all of the games broadcast on replay for what seems like a long time.  So even if I can't watch it because of blackout or I'm doing something else, I just wait until 30 minutes (or a full day) after the game and know I can watch it then.  Plus I have iPad with AppleTV so it is as good as watching it on cable.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: akmarq on March 01, 2013, 12:35:48 PM
Is there a reason that colligate athletic conferences don't set up something similar to MLBTv or NHL Gamecenter? It wouldn't help (WI-based) Marquette fans watch MU games, but I would pay a price to be able to watch every other conference game on my computer.

I don't have cable either and don't have a problem going down to the bar to watch MU road games. I would be willing to pay $50-$80/season to watch every out of market Big East game though. As it is, I've been known to find 'alternative' streams of games. You'd think that some of my money would be better than none of my money...
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 12:57:52 PM
Quote from: NavinRJohnson on March 01, 2013, 09:27:40 AM
NFL, MLB, BCS, Daytona/NASCAR...I guess I'd be surprised if they didn't try. That's like 10 years out though, isn't it?


The problem they have is most of the contracts for the big properties are signed right now for years, many by ESPN.  That's why the timing of all this on Fox's part I find interesting. 
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: 🏀 on March 01, 2013, 01:07:25 PM
Quote from: THEultimateWARRIOR on March 01, 2013, 12:25:03 PM
With Fox Sports taking over will the games be on a major tv channel like the NFL games (channels 2-8)? Or will it be on the same channel as speed, which as I recall was in the 100's.

I would imagine there would be Saturday doubleheaders on the National , over-the-air FOX station. Everything else will get regulated to FOX1(SPEED), FOX2(FUEL TV) and the regional FSNs.
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: Groin_pull on March 01, 2013, 01:16:44 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 01, 2013, 12:57:52 PM
The problem they have is most of the contracts for the big properties are signed right now for years, many by ESPN.  That's why the timing of all this on Fox's part I find interesting. 

Fox isn't stupid. What do you think they have planned? Is possible that some of those contracts have out clauses...so Fox could end up stealing a few plums from ESPN?
Title: Re: New Fox Sports
Post by: MUfan12 on March 01, 2013, 01:17:32 PM
The trainwreck that NBC Sports Network has been will be a good example of what not to do for Fox.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev