Player Grades: Marquette vs DePaul
Written by: Andrei Greska
Vander Blue (18 pts, 3 reb, 2 ast) You can tell Blue has taken it to the next level when he has a quiet game and still scores 18. Vander had one nice pull-up jumper in the first but did ... Continue reading → (http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/)
(http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=painttouches.com&blog=28348875&post=5590&subd=painttouches&ref=&feed=1)
http://painttouches.com/2013/02/09/player-grades-marquette-vs-depaul/
Thanks.
Just fyi there is no blurb on Jamil and Mayo had more than three points.
Whoops. Thanks for the heads up!
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11? I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.
Quote from: wadesworld on February 09, 2013, 04:24:48 PM
I like the idea, but nobody below a C in a game that we beat 1-9 DePaul by 11? I'd say as a team we were at a C-, which would mean a few players would be (well) below that.
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.
C-, eh? You're a tough grader.
Quote from: AZWarrior on February 09, 2013, 04:29:16 PM
One could make an argument our D could have been better, but we shot 56% from the field, 89% from the line (making more FTs than they attempted) while out rebounding them as well.
C-, eh?You're a tough grader.
Our defense absolutely
should have been better. There is no doubt about that. The offensive numbers were great, but so is every teams' who plays DePaul.
The grades should have been much lower given that no one played defense.