http://mhermher.blogspot.com/2012/05/breakdown-of-nba-playoff-minutes.html
Great showing by MU (even if it is mostly dwade). Here's a preview img:
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Z6m0OEZBicY/T7MWQI614yI/AAAAAAAAB9k/mmRIxWB4hYU/s640/NBA+Minutes+by+College.PNG)
Who would have guessed Florida International had so many good players.
Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 16, 2012, 09:40:49 PM
http://mhermher.blogspot.com/2012/05/breakdown-of-nba-playoff-minutes.html
Great showing by MU (even if it is mostly dwade). Here's a preview img:
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Z6m0OEZBicY/T7MWQI614yI/AAAAAAAAB9k/mmRIxWB4hYU/s640/NBA+Minutes+by+College.PNG)
Why isn't Wisconsin and Notre Dame on this list? Too many traditionals? ;D
I believe Lazar had two of those the other night. Let's not short sell his contributions to the cause.
Quote from: Bocephys on May 16, 2012, 09:46:16 PM
I believe Lazar had two of those the other night. Let's not short sell his contributions to the cause.
But the chart shows Round One minutes.
His minutes would count towards Round Two.
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 10:02:50 AM
But the chart shows Round One minutes.
His minutes would count towards Round Two.
Good catch, I didn't realize that chart was just for round 1.
Seeing that chart by conference confirmed my belief about the Big Ten. The Big Ten outperforms their talent level. The ACC, SEC, & PAC-12 are usually loaded with talent but they actually underperform versus their talent levels.
Yes, yes, the ACC has probably been the best conference the past "X" amount of years, but if you look at the talent they have, the schools still underperform.
It would have been more interesting to see the ACC numbers not including Pitt and Cuse as that definitely skewed the ACC data.
Quote from: MarquetteDano on May 17, 2012, 12:20:18 PM
Seeing that chart by conference confirmed my belief about the Big Ten. The Big Ten outperforms their talent level. The ACC, SEC, & PAC-12 are usually loaded with talent but they actually underperform versus their talent levels.
Yes, yes, the ACC has probably been the best conference the past "X" amount of years, but if you look at the talent they have, the schools still underperform.
It would have been more interesting to see the ACC numbers not including Pitt and Cuse as that definitely skewed the ACC data.
OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel
Quote from: PTM on May 17, 2012, 12:23:46 PM
OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel
What?!? No Wisconsin?
Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?
Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 16, 2012, 09:40:49 PM
http://mhermher.blogspot.com/2012/05/breakdown-of-nba-playoff-minutes.html
Great showing by MU (even if it is mostly dwade). Here's a preview img:
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Z6m0OEZBicY/T7MWQI614yI/AAAAAAAAB9k/mmRIxWB4hYU/s640/NBA+Minutes+by+College.PNG)
Great stuff, and good job for Lazar getting in 5 minutes in the first round for the team I've got to believe is the favorite now after the injuries to the Bulls eliminated them and the injury to Bosh has the HEat in peril.
Quote from: PTM on May 17, 2012, 12:23:46 PM
OSU and MSU are usually well-stocked in the talent cabinet, and those are the only two on the list. So, I wouldn't draw that parallel
Not talking about OSU & MSU alone. If you look further down the list you will see the Big Ten as a conference gets the least amount of minutes among the major conferences. However the Big Ten has not been the worst of the major conferences year in and year out.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pKcslcceB5I/T7RJh-3SB_I/AAAAAAAAB9w/gjQqjPrp4fc/s1600/NBA+Minutes+by+Conference.PNG)
Awesome information. Just curious, what is meant by Adjusted Minutes?
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 01:47:58 PM
What?!? No Wisconsin?
Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?
Harris played 1st round with Utah, Stiemsma doesn't play much, and Leuer plays on the Bucks, who are rarely in the playoffs.
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on May 17, 2012, 01:47:58 PM
What?!? No Wisconsin?
Devin Harris?
Greg Stiemesma?
Jon Leuer?
Way to be cocky since there is exactly 1 impact MU player.
Quote from: buckchuckler on May 18, 2012, 03:46:06 PM
Way to be cocky since there is exactly 1 impact MU player.
Which is infinitely more impact players than Wisconsin!
Quote from: Bocephys on May 18, 2012, 03:49:45 PM
Which is infinitely more impact players than Wisconsin!
Haha, ok fair enough.