Thank you Marquette marketing department for making games entertaining even during stoppages in play. Every timeout at Marquette has something going on to entertain the fans. Parachutes, crowd cameo, JAG, season ticket holder of the game, kiss cam, dance cam, big head, miller party row, student tuition, pizza giveaway, zooperstars, etc.
Every single timeout at the Joyce Center the band plays, the cheerleaders do some formation, the leprechaun acts drunk, and the students do arm motions. EVERY SINGLE TIMEOUT!!! EIGHT TIMES A GAME NOT EVEN COUNTING CALLED TIMEOUTS!!! There was one timeout where they threw balls into the crowd, only to go back into the standard timeout boringness. The timeouts seem like hours at the Joyce.
Never will I take a MU Triva question for granted again! Thank you Marquette!
I wish the MU band played more at the BC.
at the bc it's nice and everything, but i wish they would change it up a little. wouldn't take too much of an imagination to come up with other fun stuff. it's just that it gets too scripted and ho-hum after 20-some games. i always loved that sumo-wrestling thing that bango does, bring out a trampoline and see if our "golden eagle" really can fly, and when they drop those parachute thingies, it would be nice if more of them had a chance to fall into the 2nd level. my seats are in the first row. and our announcer sounds like a d-bag with his long-fake warbbling of our guys names-sounds too www-like ;D
Quote from: TallTitan34 on February 04, 2012, 06:32:22 PM
Thank you Marquette marketing department for making games entertaining even during stoppages in play. Every timeout at Marquette has something going on to entertain the fans. Parachutes, crowd cameo, JAG, season ticket holder of the game, kiss cam, dance cam, big head, miller party row, student tuition, pizza giveaway, zooperstars, etc.
Every single timeout at the Joyce Center the band plays, the cheerleaders do some formation, the leprechaun acts drunk, and the students do arm motions. EVERY SINGLE TIMEOUT!!! EIGHT TIMES A GAME NOT EVEN COUNTING CALLED TIMEOUTS!!! There was one timeout where they threw balls into the crowd, only to go back into the standard timeout boringness. The timeouts seem like hours at the Joyce.
Never will I take a MU Triva question for granted again! Thank you Marquette!
Maybe that's why that dump is such a snakepit for opposing teams.
I'm not a ND football hater, but hearing the arrogant little pricks sing the ND fight song in the Joyce makes me ill.
Quote from: TallTitan34 on February 04, 2012, 06:32:22 PM
Thank you Marquette marketing department for making games entertaining even during stoppages in play. Every timeout at Marquette has something going on to entertain the fans. Parachutes, crowd cameo, JAG, season ticket holder of the game, kiss cam, dance cam, big head, miller party row, student tuition, pizza giveaway, zooperstars, etc.
Every single timeout at the Joyce Center the band plays, the cheerleaders do some formation, the leprechaun acts drunk, and the students do arm motions. EVERY SINGLE TIMEOUT!!! EIGHT TIMES A GAME NOT EVEN COUNTING CALLED TIMEOUTS!!! There was one timeout where they threw balls into the crowd, only to go back into the standard timeout boringness. The timeouts seem like hours at the Joyce.
Never will I take a MU Triva question for granted again! Thank you Marquette!
More teal than a San Jose Sharks garage sale.
I did like having someone actually sing the national anthem last game rather than just the band playing it, but whoever is in charge of the big heads needs to do better.
ND also did a "flash mob" with their dance team, cheer leaders and student section. It was dumb.
The student section also changed OJ's better when Mayo was shooting free throws. Safe to say that the student section was led by Captain Obvious (sorry for lack of a better joke). Too bad MU never got to the bonus, then maybe we could hear about Crowder's hair or Junior's long socks.
Quote from: seakm4 on February 05, 2012, 11:36:55 PM
I did like having someone actually sing the national anthem last game rather than just the band playing it, but whoever is in charge of the big heads needs to do better.
The big heads are getting old. Need something new.
Big heads are getting lame - as lame as the intro that says "best student section in the country"
Quote from: MUMac on February 06, 2012, 08:00:09 AM
The big heads are getting old. Need something new.
I agree they are getting old, but they are sponsered so they bring in money. Therefore they should keep doing them.
Quote from: MUDPT on February 06, 2012, 07:59:29 AM
ND also did a "flash mob" with their dance team, cheer leaders and student section. It was dumb.
The student section also changed OJ's better when Mayo was shooting free throws. Safe to say that the student section was led by Captain Obvious (sorry for lack of a better joke). Too bad MU never got to the bonus, then maybe we could hear about Crowder's hair or Junior's long socks.
I sat behind the student section at the game, and I actually thought the flash mob thing was kind of cool. As much as I hate to admit it, their student section (while it is significantly smaller) is definitely more engaged than MU's.
Also, their pep band has a significantly larger repertoire than Marquette's. Granted, they need it since they don't really have any promotions during timeouts and breaks, but has our band played anything new at all in the past 3-4 years? For God's sake, they have been playing "Celebration" since I went to school there in the Stone Age!
Kewl and the Gang never gets old in my book...
Quote from: ringout on February 05, 2012, 01:49:52 PM
Maybe that's why that dump is such a snakepit for opposing teams.
I'm not a ND football hater, but hearing the arrogant little pricks sing the ND fight song in the Joyce makes me ill.
That's exactly why -- many years down the road when the Bucks have left town and the BC is condemned -- MU needs to emulate the Joyce & Pavillion when it builds its next arena... but of course, still only Ring Out Ahoya three times a game (four if it goes to OT).
I never liked our fight song and they seem to play it constantly.
I hate when they play jump around at the BC, because everyone knows that is a huge Badger tradition. Wish they would modernize the playlist a little bit.
Finally, does anyone else cringe a bit when they show our band on national TV? Yikes.
Quote from: frozena pizza on February 06, 2012, 08:59:34 AM
I never liked our fight song and they seem to play it constantly.
I hate when they play jump around at the BC, because everyone knows that is a huge Badger tradition. Wish they would modernize the playlist a little bit.
Finally, does anyone else cringe a bit when they show our band on national TV? Yikes.
They showed the ND band on Saturday. Yikes. More acne than, well... I don't know, but a lot of acne.
Quote from: frozena pizza on February 06, 2012, 08:59:34 AM
I never liked our fight song and they seem to play it constantly.
I hate when they play jump around at the BC, because everyone knows that is a huge Badger tradition. Wish they would modernize the playlist a little bit.
Finally, does anyone else cringe a bit when they show our band on national TV? Yikes.
No I think the band looks OK. I mean, it's a band. They are always a step behind fashion-wise though. My friend still had to wear one of those beanie hats in the late 80s. And then they went to the rugby style shirts about a decade after they went out of date.
I was watching the MSU / Michigan game and Clark Kellogg said that he thought the Breslin Center was the perfect size for a college basketball arena. But I don't think the problem with the BC is its size...its the layout. I mean, the Kohl Center is just a little smaller, but it seems like such a more intimate basketball arena, and they play hockey there too. They built it more up than out.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on February 06, 2012, 09:04:16 AM
I don't think the problem with the BC is its size...its the layout. I mean, the Kohl Center is just a little smaller, but it seems like such a more intimate basketball arena, and they play hockey there too. They built it more up than out.
This. It was built for hockey so the seating isn't ideal for basketball.
I do have to say that I now have another school to point to when someone mentions Marquette's lack of diversity. I can honestly claim that other than a couple of Asian coeds, I did not see a single person of color in the ND student section.
And regarding that row of boys in the front with their shirts off - what an evil tactic! Trying to blind our players by having the stadium lights bounce off that stunningly white Irish skin!
Quote from: TallTitan34 on February 06, 2012, 09:08:37 AM
This. It was built for hockey so the seating isn't ideal for basketball.
Agreed. It's all in the design, and more seats doesn't necessarily equal a better arena; conversely, less seats doesn't lead to better arena either.
The sight-lines you want for a hockey game are very much "wider" than you want for basketball, much like football. When it comes to watching the game (i.e. ignoring the excitement generated by the "look how close I am" factor), court-side seats are awesome for a basketball game, but for hockey, football, and to an extent, baseball, the view from row one is many times worse than it is from row 50. In other words, you can see the game better if you sit a little bit further away when watching hockey then when watching basketball; so the BC was a proper design. It's simply the case that the design doesn't translate to its primary use, and no amount of concession & retail, neighborhood development, parking additions, scoreboard enhancements, etc. are going to change the fact that BC is modestly craptacular when it comes to basketball, regardless of who is actually playing.
Moral of Story:
1) Don't build a church for the Easter Sunday crowd.
2) Don't design a multipurpose arena for hockey.
I don't understand the "build for hockey". Was Milwaukee in the running for an NHL team?
Quote from: radome on February 06, 2012, 11:27:39 AM
I don't understand the "build for hockey". Was Milwaukee in the running for an NHL team?
The Pettit family built the Bradley Center for a NHL franchise. I believe the NHL jacked up the franchise fee like 30% and the team was never brought. I think this opportunity became the Tampa Bay Lighting.
Quote from: radome on February 06, 2012, 11:27:39 AM
I don't understand the "build for hockey". Was Milwaukee in the running for an NHL team?
Kind of. Remember the BC was built by Jane (Bradley) and Llloyd Pettit who owned the Admirals. In the late 80s, they planned to apply for a NHL expansion franchise but then balked at the high application fee, plus they were going to have to pay off the Wirtz family because they claimed Milwaukee was in the Hawks territory. (Which is so stupid because I don't know many Milwaukeans that go down to the United Center to watch the Hawks.)
The franchises eventually went to Tampa and Ottawa. Honestly, it was a disappointment at the time, but I doubt the franchise would have done much.
If they ever replaced the BC, you can bet the new arena would be much more geared toward basketball.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on February 06, 2012, 11:38:06 AM
Kind of. Remember the BC was built by Jane (Bradley) and Llloyd Pettit who owned the Admirals. In the late 80s, they planned to apply for a NHL expansion franchise but then balked at the high application fee, plus they were going to have to pay off the Wirtz family because they claimed Milwaukee was in the Hawks territory. (Which is so stupid because I don't know many Milwaukeans that go down to the United Center to watch the Hawks.)
The franchises eventually went to Tampa and Ottawa. Honestly, it was a disappointment at the time, but I doubt the franchise would have done much.
If they ever replaced the BC, you can bet the new arena would be much more geared toward basketball.
I'm not complaining. The city of Milwaukee basically got a free arena out of the deal (not like us chumps down in Illinois, where taxes paid by folks down in Carbondale funded the construction of the new Comiskey). And Marquette got one of the largest venues currently used for college basketball built a few blocks from campus.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on February 06, 2012, 11:38:06 AM
Kind of. Remember the BC was built by Jane (Bradley) and Llloyd Pettit who owned the Admirals. In the late 80s, they planned to apply for a NHL expansion franchise but then balked at the high application fee, plus they were going to have to pay off the Wirtz family because they claimed Milwaukee was in the Hawks territory. (Which is so stupid because I don't know many Milwaukeans that go down to the United Center to watch the Hawks.)
Not just that, but the Pettits were actually favored to land the expansion if not for the $50M expansion fee, which as PTM implied, was somewhat unexpected. However, consider at that point that the last true expansion of the NHL was the 1974 addition of the Washington Capitals and KC Scouts (now NJ Devils), although when the WHA went belly up, the Whale, Nordiques, Oilers and Jets "merged" with the NHL in 1979 (by virtue of being the top four finishers in the WHA's last season). I have no idea what any of those teams paid in expansion fees, but in any event, the NHL had to re-define what the expansion fee would be. I'm sure the Wirtz's did everything they could to get that fee high enough so as to discourage the Pettits, probably with a little nudging from their old friends the Esposito brothers, because when the Pettit's bowed out, in step the Espositos with $50M in hand, and thus, the Tampa Bay Lightning were born.
Quote from: Benny B on February 06, 2012, 12:14:30 PM
Not just that, but the Pettits were actually favored to land the expansion if not for the $50M expansion fee, which as PTM implied, was somewhat unexpected. However, consider at that point that the last true expansion of the NHL was the 1974 addition of the Washington Capitals and KC Scouts (now NJ Devils), although when the WHA went belly up, the Whale, Nordiques, Oilers and Jets "merged" with the NHL in 1979 (by virtue of being the top four finishers in the WHA's last season). I have no idea what any of those teams paid in expansion fees, but in any event, the NHL had to re-define what the expansion fee would be. I'm sure the Wirtz's did everything they could to get that fee high enough so as to discourage the Pettits, probably with a little nudging from their old friends the Esposito brothers, because when the Pettit's bowed out, in step the Espositos with $50M in hand, and thus, the Tampa Bay Lightning were born.
The Isles paid $4M to the Rangers in '72, the Devils paid a combined $12.5M to the Rangers/Isles/Flyers when they moved from CO and LA received half of Anaheim's $50M expansion fee.
The Jets, Nords, Oilers and Whalers paid $6M to get into the NHL in 1979.
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2012, 08:16:20 AM
I sat behind the student section at the game, and I actually thought the flash mob thing was kind of cool. As much as I hate to admit it, their student section (while it is significantly smaller) is definitely more engaged than MU's.
Also, their pep band has a significantly larger repertoire than Marquette's. Granted, they need it since they don't really have any promotions during timeouts and breaks, but has our band played anything new at all in the past 34 years? For God's sake, they have been playing "Celebration" since I went to school there in the Stone Age!
Fixed.
Quote from: warriorchick on February 06, 2012, 08:16:20 AM
I sat behind the student section at the game, and I actually thought the flash mob thing was kind of cool.
why was the guy from bobby's world there?
http://www.memoram.com/howie_mandel_bwSHOP.jpg
Quote from: TallTitan34 on February 04, 2012, 06:32:22 PM
Thank you Marquette marketing department for making games entertaining even during stoppages in play. Every timeout at Marquette has something going on to entertain the fans. Parachutes, crowd cameo, JAG, season ticket holder of the game, kiss cam, dance cam, big head, miller party row, student tuition, pizza giveaway, zooperstars, etc.
this might be a dumb question, but its the day after the Super Bowl... my brain isn't quiet back to a normal level of processing, what is JAG?
--- nevermind--- Jump Around Guy.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on February 06, 2012, 11:38:06 AM
Kind of. Remember the BC was built by Jane (Bradley) and Llloyd Pettit who owned the Admirals. In the late 80s, they planned to apply for a NHL expansion franchise but then balked at the high application fee, plus they were going to have to pay off the Wirtz family because they claimed Milwaukee was in the Hawks territory. (Which is so stupid because I don't know many Milwaukeans that go down to the United Center to watch the Hawks.)
The franchises eventually went to Tampa and Ottawa. Honestly, it was a disappointment at the time, but I doubt the franchise would have done much.
If they ever replaced the BC, you can bet the new arena would be much more geared toward basketball.
Thanks, I've been wondering that. However, I didn't feel like other arenas designed for hockey and basketball have such weird sight-lines and those huge gaps at the ends. But after looking at Georgtown's and the newish Sprint Center, it seems they all have those awkward gaps.
Verizon
(http://grfx.cstv.com/schools/gu/graphics/gu-verizon-center-600.jpg)
Sprint
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2016/2118088784_0953c8a04c.jpg)
Bradley
(http://grfx.cstv.com/schools/marq/graphics/auto/Bradley-Center-Interior-NSM.jpg)
One thing the Bradley Center suffers from is that it was one of the first "new generation" of arenas. The Palace of Auburn Hills and the Bradley Center opened in 1988. The only one older is MSG. (The Oakland arena opened in 1969 but was remodeled extensively just a few years ago.)
I have no doubt if it were built today, the BC would look a lot differently then it does now. As I mentioned before, the Kohl Center doesn't suffer from the same issues.
too bad they/mu peoples don't try to work with the bc peoples to make the place more b-ball friendly. by that i mean, bring the crowd closer to the floor and close up at least one of the end zones. preferably the student section one where the away team has to shoot into it in the 2nd half.
Quote from: Aughnanure on February 06, 2012, 03:30:58 PM
Thanks, I've been wondering that. However, I didn't feel like other arenas designed for hockey and basketball have such weird sight-lines and those huge gaps at the ends. But after looking at Georgtown's and the newish Sprint Center, it seems they all have those awkward gaps.
Modular seating doesn't fit well into corners and if you fill them in permanently, then you wouldn't be able to get the monster trucks inside.
I get why the BC, Sprint, Verizon, etc. are built the way they are... it's simple economics. But much like a 1961 Ferrari 250 GT, having a basketball arena is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on February 06, 2012, 03:35:01 PM
One thing the Bradley Center suffers from is that it was one of the first "new generation" of arenas. The Palace of Auburn Hills and the Bradley Center opened in 1988. The only one older is MSG. (The Oakland arena opened in 1969 but was remodeled extensively just a few years ago.)
I have no doubt if it were built today, the BC would look a lot differently then it does now. As I mentioned before, the Kohl Center doesn't suffer from the same issues.
Sacramento opened in 1988 as well.
Have they used an indoor flying golden eagle to drop a baby eagle plush?
OP reinforced by the 5th rate DePaul marketing effort at the Horizon. The seating is decent (way better than Ivan ever get at the BC), but the timeout events are embarrassing and the scoreboard video is worse than the 15 year old tv in the spare bedroom. Eee gads.
Quote from: LloydMooresLegs on February 06, 2012, 11:23:36 PM
OP reinforced by the 5th rate DePaul marketing effort at the Horizon. The seating is decent (way better than Ivan ever get at the BC), but the timeout events are embarrassing and the scoreboard video is worse than the 15 year old tv in the spare bedroom. Eee gads.
DePaul Timeouts >>>>>> Notre Dame Timeouts
At least they utilize the scoreboard and do promotions during timeouts.