MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: SonofPianoMan on January 27, 2010, 11:28:29 AM

Title: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: SonofPianoMan on January 27, 2010, 11:28:29 AM
Any explanation on the use of all of the timeouts by Rutgers at the end of the game? It was over, but they continued to use them and I don't understand why. thx
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: Skatastrophy on January 27, 2010, 11:32:53 AM
I'd guess that they were trying to use the game time as a learning experience for their players.  Taking the timeouts and making adjustments during a blowout will be good experience for when they end up in a close game later this season.
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: GGGG on January 27, 2010, 11:37:45 AM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on January 27, 2010, 11:32:53 AM
I'd guess that they were trying to use the game time as a learning experience for their players.  Taking the timeouts and making adjustments during a blowout will be good experience for when they end up in a close game later this season.


Plus, while I'm sure the players wanted to get off the floor, keeping them there for a little extra time doesn't hurt.
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: LON on January 27, 2010, 11:42:36 AM
Quote from: SonofPianoMan on January 27, 2010, 11:28:29 AM
Any explanation on the use of all of the timeouts by Rutgers at the end of the game? It was over, but they continued to use them and I don't understand why. thx

The coach is always coaching, no matter the score.  If he isn't, then I'm not sure I want that guy as my team's coach.
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on January 27, 2010, 11:51:58 AM
Peter Carrol would have thrown a bomb on Fred Hill if he tried that
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: StillAWarrior on January 27, 2010, 11:58:30 AM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on January 27, 2010, 11:51:58 AM
Peter Carrol would have thrown a bomb on Fred Hill if he tried that

Obligatory:  Can't you ever let a thread pass without making a subtle jab at Buzz.

Hey, this is fun.  I can do it too!
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: Canned Goods n Ammo on January 27, 2010, 12:00:26 PM
I actually thought it was kind of bush league.

Fred's team got run out of the building for the first 20min.

The next 16min. were played to a standstill (with MU up 20).

Then in the last 4 min, Fred decides to press (which actually worked) and call TOs. WTF Freddy? You decide to start "coaching" in the last 4min?

I thought it sort of sucked. If they had been pressing all game, I could understand continuing that style... but to break it out in the last few minutes seemed weird.

Probably should have done it earlier... might have thrown off MU's rhythm in the 1st half.
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on January 27, 2010, 07:05:23 PM
Quote from: StillAWarrior on January 27, 2010, 11:58:30 AM
Obligatory:  Can't you ever let a thread pass without making a subtle jab at Buzz.

Hey, this is fun.  I can do it too!

I read this earlier on my blackberry (no teal color) and though, what the hell is he talking about.  Glad I see the teal now.

;D
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: cheebs09 on January 27, 2010, 07:29:22 PM
Quote from: 2002mualum on January 27, 2010, 12:00:26 PM
I actually thought it was kind of bush league.

Fred's team got run out of the building for the first 20min.

The next 16min. were played to a standstill (with MU up 20).

Then in the last 4 min, Fred decides to press (which actually worked) and call TOs. WTF Freddy? You decide to start "coaching" in the last 4min?

I thought it sort of sucked. If they had been pressing all game, I could understand continuing that style... but to break it out in the last few minutes seemed weird.

Probably should have done it earlier... might have thrown off MU's rhythm in the 1st half.

At first I was annoyed by it, but figured it was a teaching point or something that Buzz has been known to do so I can of understood. After reading what you wrote I totally agree because for most of the game it didn't seem like RU and him cared at all about the game.

I knew the game was over in the middle of the first half when Rutgers had a steal or something and got an easy lay up in transition and we inbounded quickly and got down the court and Jimmy had an easy dunk. Rutgers had maybe one guy back and I couldn't believe it. Hill didn't even change the expression on his face or sub someone out. I would have been shocked/angry if this were to happen to us and Buzz did not either call a timeout and chew out the team or go right to the bench and chew out some guys as they came off the floor. Granted with this team I don't think we ever have to worry about them not getting back on D, which is something that makes me proud to be an MU fan (and something I've noticed about these teams for many years)

Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: smellofhotbeeftips on January 28, 2010, 05:58:26 PM
Quote from: cheebs09 on January 27, 2010, 07:29:22 PM
Buzz did not either call a timeout and chew out the team or go right to the bench and chew out some guys as they came off the floor.

You are a closet UW-Madison fan and this is a sick, subliminal attack on our coach!
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: W on January 28, 2010, 08:14:05 PM
I was thinking bush league myself.  Also, did anyone else notice Rutgers' coach yelling while our guys were shooting free throws? 

W
Title: Re: Rutgers use of timeouts at the end of the game?
Post by: smellofhotbeeftips on January 28, 2010, 10:02:06 PM
Quote from: W on January 28, 2010, 08:14:05 PM
I was thinking bush league myself.  Also, did anyone else notice Rutgers' coach yelling while our guys were shooting free throws? 

W

And to think that man has MU blood in his veins!
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev