Scholarship table
That is shocking. The man is a laughingstock.
I've got too many laughingstock congresspeople here in NC to keep track of. Can only follow so many laughingstocks who are gerrymandered into place.
Humans are no longer necessary.
As it stands, the most practical solution for this looming problem — save for the advent of mass human content farms, where we lowly carbon-based creatures click and clack away to feed the endless data thirst of our robot overlords
This is as good a place to put this ..Someone in the neighborhood died, and I was looking for a story .. checked the newspaper, then Facebook. Found a dozen hits for obit/stories, but when I read them, they all seemed odd and vague. Finally found the real obit and realized .. the dozen other hits for stories .. were certainly scraped from the real obit, then run through AI to get hits on their websites. What the actual fock, humans. Can you imagine brainstorming ideas on how to get traffic to your shítty website and coming up with writing fake stories about a recently deceased kid?
Demographic doom.Sure looks like people in their late 20s, 30s .. have plateaued at 1 in 3 married.I'd imagine the next decade's kids will be 1 in 4 or worse. Those numbers really pack a demographic punch. Fewer marriages, fewer kids. More wild sex parties, though?Let us know, young Scoop nation.
The Washington Post gave a pretty good reason a few weeks back
Drag queens?
True doom
you idiot! Explain thishttps://weather.com/weather/tenday/l/Milwaukee+WI?canonicalCityId=317bac1c5a109363e634cb3a35bc7ac00f6b8a92fe2113a4ec81ac40839fd007
A graph that begins in 1850 hardly can define a norm for a planet Billions of years old. It misses the Roman warming period and the Medieval warming period as well. Plus a gas that comprises .04% of the atmosphere and is the reason plants thrive is not a culprit for a “climate crisis”. Science you cannot question is not science that is propoganda
Plus a gas that comprises .04% of the atmosphere and is the reason plants thrive is not a culprit for a “climate crisis”.
My thoughts:1. Co-habitation with an SO is pretty normal now. Even just after I graduated from MU in 1990, people usually didn't live together prior to marriage. Now it happens all of the time.2. If living together outside of marriage is commonplace, then the primary reason to get married is to have children. And younger people just aren't doing that. The US is following western Europe, China, Japan, etc. and just not having children. They're expensive.I could go on about what this would mean for our economic outlook and how it needs to mesh with our immigration policy, but that's a different topic.
2. If living together outside of marriage is commonplace, then the primary reason to get married is to have children. And younger people just aren't doing that. The US is following western Europe, China, Japan, etc. and just not having children. They're expensive.