RGV's Work

[79Warrior]

Geez Did not say that. We are renewing. We are locked in and have renewed and supported the program since 1966 and probably more than most everyone.  Maybe even You. If you want Marquette to win and succeed and profit, Losing Season ticket holders is not the best. Prefer to do more than survive. Would like to win, have fun and succeed.

Agree and I believe you will see movement in the offseason. We are on the same page. Changes are coming.

[Juan Anderson's Mixtape]

Very excited to build around Niguel Wallace!

https://x.com/i/status/2031915220726063295

[MU Fan in Connecticut]

Very excited to build around Niguel Wallace!

https://x.com/i/status/2031915220726063295

Doppelganger

[Hards Alumni]

We need a couple of animal bangers down low.

You're a little on the old side, but very qualified.

Not sure the creatures are interested, though.

[Hards Alumni]

Very excited to build around Niguel Wallace!

https://x.com/i/status/2031915220726063295

Nice one white dick

[MarquetteMike1977]

Nigel And Damarius shooting on the court during timeout at the Bucks game today

[MuMark]

https://youtu.be/JNUlYdOED-I?is=JeD9DWoONfWf5hs2

[NCMUFan]

O-Max was a transfer.  Does he qualify?

[Scoop Snoop]

O-Max was a transfer.  Does he qualify?

Not only was O-Max a transfer, but so was Kolek. I think that they both "qualify".

[Galway Eagle]

They were transfers but iirc both were coaching change situations so wouldn't they have been granted eligibility anyways in the prior era? Not really a "portal" situation.

[Jay Bee]

They were transfers but iirc both were coaching change situations so wouldn't they have been granted eligibility anyways in the prior era? Not really a "portal" situation.

No and no.

[Galway Eagle]

No and no.

My bad just Kolek was a coaching change. But I'm confused on the second no? Are you saying there wasn't a coaching exception prior to the modern transfer portal?

[Jay Bee]

My bad just Kolek was a coaching change. But I'm confused on the second no? Are you saying there wasn't a coaching exception prior to the modern transfer portal?

Correct.

Adding on: Remember, in the 'old days', student-athletes committed to the institution, not a coach or a team or anything else. The school.

[brewcity77]

Correct.

Adding on: Remember, in the 'old days', student-athletes committed to the institution, not a coach or a team or anything else. The school.

This was never the case. The rules prevented ease of movement, but the premise is blatantly false.

Nick Williams didn't commit to Marquette, he committed to Tom Crean and went to Indiana when Crean left. Tyshawn Taylor didn't commit to Marquette, or he would stayed with Buzz Williams.

Ahmed Hill, Satchel Pierce, and Marial Shayok didn't commit to Marquette, they committed to Buzz. Then when he left, all three went elsewhere.

In the other direction, David Joplin, Keeyan Itejere, and Emarion Ellis didn't commit to Texas, they committed to Shaka, hence why they ended up here when he changed jobs.

Just because the rules made it difficult to follow a coach after enrolling before freedom of movement doesn't mean student-athletes committed to universities or you never would've seen a commitment flip. It just meant the players were trapped in ways the coaches were not.

[Jay Bee]

This was never the case. The rules prevented ease of movement, but the premise is blatantly false.

Nick Williams didn't commit to Marquette, he committed to Tom Crean and went to Indiana when Crean left. Tyshawn Taylor didn't commit to Marquette, or he would stayed with Buzz Williams.

Ahmed Hill, Satchel Pierce, and Marial Shayok didn't commit to Marquette, they committed to Buzz. Then when he left, all three went elsewhere.

In the other direction, David Joplin, Keeyan Itejere, and Emarion Ellis didn't commit to Texas, they committed to Shaka, hence why they ended up here when he changed jobs.

Just because the rules made it difficult to follow a coach after enrolling before freedom of movement doesn't mean student-athletes committed to universities or you never would've seen a commitment flip. It just meant the players were trapped in ways the coaches were not.

#FakeNews #Lies

You're conflating topics, but let's address them both. The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT.

In order for those kids to change schools, the institution they were bound to needed to take steps before the kids were allowed to do so.

Nonetheless, Galway was talking about certain guys that transferred after playing at one place or another. In the old days, once they transferred they had to sit out a year in residence -- they were not immediately eligible -- if they transferred after a coaching change. It no matta'd.

[Uncle Rico]

#FakeNews #Lies

You're conflating topics, but let's address them both. The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT.

In order for those kids to change schools, the institution they were bound to needed to take steps before the kids were allowed to do so.

Nonetheless, Galway was talking about certain guys that transferred after playing at one place or another. In the old days, once they transferred they had to sit out a year in residence -- they were not immediately eligible -- if they transferred after a coaching change. It no matta'd.

Lol, and teams aren't spending millions on their rosters

[brewcity77]

#FakeNews #Lies

You're conflating topics, but let's address them both. The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT.

In order for those kids to change schools, the institution they were bound to needed to take steps before the kids were allowed to do so.

Nonetheless, Galway was talking about certain guys that transferred after playing at one place or another. In the old days, once they transferred they had to sit out a year in residence -- they were not immediately eligible -- if they transferred after a coaching change. It no matta'd.

#FakeNews #Lies

You're conflating a signature with a commitment.

They signed with the school but committed to the coach. That's why commitments would flip. It was the coach pounding the pavement, traveling to meetings, watching AAU & HS games, not the academic institution. It was the coach who offered the scholarship.

If the coach didn't recruit the player and offer the scholarship, the player wouldn't come to the university. They committed to the coach.

There might be a handful of Ivy exceptions, but even those were probably rare where the coach wasn't involved ahead of time. Nice deflection attempt, but wording matters and you're wrong here.

[Jay Bee]

Wording does matter. It's a binding legal agreement. Read 'em and weep.

[brewcity77]

Wording does matter. It's a binding legal agreement. Read 'em and weep.

You're still wrong. Commiting and signing are two different things. Is it pedantic to call out your inaccuracy? Sure. But we all learned that from you.

[Jay Bee]

You're still wrong. Commiting and signing are two different things. Is it pedantic to call out your inaccuracy? Sure. But we all learned that from you.

*Committing

There is no inaccuracy in what I said.

[brewcity77]

*Committing

There is no inaccuracy in what I said.

Autocorrect not my friend today, that was a misspelling.

Using the word committing instead of signing was inaccurate. It's okay to admit when you're wrong. I know it's hard for you but you'll get over it.

[Uncle Rico]

Autocorrect not my friend today, that was a misspelling.

Using the word committing instead of signing was inaccurate. It's okay to admit when you're wrong. I know it's hard for you but you'll get over it.

He won't

[Jay Bee]

Autocorrect not my friend today, that was a misspelling.

Using the word committing instead of signing was inaccurate. It's okay to admit when you're wrong. I know it's hard for you but you'll get over it.

No it wasn't. You're wrong and it's sad.

When I said "committed" I was referring to the NLI. That's why I clarified, "The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT."

Sorry you're having a rough life.

[The Sultan]

No it wasn't. You're wrong and it's sad.

When I said "committed" I was referring to the NLI. That's why I clarified, "The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT."

Sorry you're having a rough life.

My understanding is that he has normal-sized hands though.

[brewcity77]

No it wasn't. You're wrong and it's sad.

When I said "committed" I was referring to the NLI. That's why I clarified, "The majority, if not all, of the kids you mentioned above signed BINDING LEGAL AGREEMENTS stating they were committing to the school, not the coach, and upon a coaching change they were still legally bound to the school. This isn't a theory or idea, this is a statement of FACT."

Sorry you're having a rough life.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.