Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Villanova Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

James/Stevens by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 12:29:15 PM]


Shaka cost us the game tonite by tower912
[Today at 12:20:07 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by rocky_warrior
[Today at 09:55:10 AM]


Can this team win 4 in a row at the Garden? by rocky_warrior
[Today at 09:52:16 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 09:31:46 AM]


[Cracketology] 404 Top-16 Reveal Not Found by brewcity77
[Today at 06:51:04 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by Aircraftcarrier
[February 13, 2026, 10:01:42 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  @ Xavier

Marquette
74
Marquette @
Xavier
Date/Time: Feb 14, 2026, 2:00pm
TV: TNT/TruTV
Schedule for 2025-26
Villanova
77

Aircraftcarrier

I think James and Stevens can be for MU what Boyd and Blackwell are for Wisconsin.If Wisconsin had a really good front court player they could reach the Final Four. Shaka needs another good big man to take MU to another level.I like Parham and Sheek.

mileskishnish72

Getting a little nervous about hearing Sheek, Sheek. He is a frosh, and look what even talents like Oso did as a frosh. I don't want to take anything away from Sheek but an experienced big for a year would help this unit.

panda

We have one of the best non lottery pick one and done type freshman in the country and we are a 20 loss team. You don't win with kids. Sheek will be great but the jump from high school to college is a big one for bigs. We need a roster overhaul to be competitive next year.

rocky_warrior

I honestly don't remember - when is the last time a redshirt player became an immediate impact?  Wade...though different circumstances?

Billy Hoyle

Quote from: mileskishnish72 on Today at 10:11:50 AMGetting a little nervous about hearing Sheek, Sheek. He is a frosh, and look what even talents like Oso did as a frosh. I don't want to take anything away from Sheek but an experienced big for a year would help this unit.

The board's hype of Sheek makes me nervous, he's going to be a 18 year old freshman and it seems people are expecting him to be Cam Boozer. O expect more production than Jesse McCollough of MSU next year, another redshirt center but not a lot more
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

panda

Quote from: rocky_warrior on Today at 10:26:28 AMI honestly don't remember - when is the last time a redshirt player became an immediate impact?  Wade...though different circumstances?

Big Joe Hauser lol

Jay Bee

Quote from: Billy Hoyle on Today at 10:54:05 AMThe board's hype of Sheek makes me nervous, he's going to be a 18 year old freshman

Sounds like...
#FakeNews #Lies

ps- an vs. a
The portal is NOT closed.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: panda on Today at 10:54:10 AMBig Joe Hauser lol

Hah, but he came early and sat for a semester due to injury, right?

Jay Bee

Quote from: rocky_warrior on Today at 11:06:25 AMHah, but he came early and sat for a semester due to injury, right?

TMI but yes. Rehabbed for spring semester after surgery. Had he not gotten injured, Wemby would be getting way less pub today.
The portal is NOT closed.

Zog from Margo

Quote from: panda on Today at 10:54:10 AMBig Joe Hauser lol

I remember one board moderator touting him as the best HS player ever in Wisconsin. He wasn't even the best Wisconsin HS player in his class.

wadesworld

Quote from: rocky_warrior on Today at 11:06:25 AMHah, but he came early and sat for a semester due to injury, right?

And Sheek came early and should be a senior in high school.

I don't think he's going to be one of the best bigs in the Big East next year. But I also don't think anyone is saying he's going to be Cameron Boozer. There is an ocean of a gap between being Cameron Boozer and being a red shirt like Caedin or Josh.

tower912

Rocky, frustration has really Sacar-ed your memory.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Also in honor of Pope Leo,  I have no enemies.  I have brothers and sisters I sometimes disagree with.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: tower912 on Today at 11:24:05 AMRocky, frustration has really Sacar-ed your memory.

This is true.

Vander Blue Man Group

1) This team does not need a "complete overhaul" to be competitive next season.  2-3 quality additions from the portal should be enough.  To me, that's not an overhaul.

2) I think most everyone is excited about Sheek.  But I don't recall a single person advocating for him being the starting 5 next season.  I think the vast majority, myself included, are aligned that a one-year starting center should be the priority in the portal.  But Sheek as the #2 center should be a nice boost compared to what we're seeing this season.

panda

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 11:41:01 AM1) This team does not need a "complete overhaul" to be competitive next season.  2-3 quality additions from the portal should be enough.  To me, that's not an overhaul.

2) I think most everyone is excited about Sheek.  But I don't recall a single person advocating for him being the starting 5 next season.  I think the vast majority, myself included, are aligned that a one-year starting center should be the priority in the portal.  But Sheek as the #2 center should be a nice boost compared to what we're seeing this season.

A 20 loss team needs a complete overhaul to compete. Otherwise you're relying on freshmen and sophomores ie same problem we have this year.

BM1090

Quote from: panda on Today at 11:44:04 AMA 20 loss team needs a complete overhaul to compete. Otherwise you're relying on freshmen and sophomores ie same problem we have this year.

Depends how the year finishes out. If we continue to play like a top 40-50 team the rest of the year like we have been for a month, no complete overhaul needed. If the play reverts to early season quality then yeah, need an overhaul.

Those early losses don't mean anything for next year

panda

#16
Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 11:56:07 AMDepends how the year finishes out. If we continue to play like a top 40-50 team the rest of the year like we have been for a month, no complete overhaul needed. If the play reverts to early season quality then yeah, need an overhaul.

Those early losses don't mean anything for next year

We're still limping to what looks like  5-7 wins in conference. James and Stevens look good. Otherwise im not going to get excited about almost winning a few games against mediocre big east talent

These results should not be vindication for Shaka to take the majority of the returning roster into next season.

Elonsmusk

Quote from: panda on Today at 10:21:36 AMWe have one of the best non lottery pick one and done type freshman in the country and we are a 20 loss team. You don't win with kids. Sheek will be great but the jump from high school to college is a big one for bigs. We need a roster overhaul to be competitive next year.

Quote from: panda on Today at 11:44:04 AMA 20 loss team needs a complete overhaul to compete. Otherwise you're relying on freshmen and sophomores ie same problem we have this year.

Drama king alert.  Roster overhaul to compete next year?  What's your win prediction if MU brings in 2 or less transfers for next season?

BM1090

Quote from: panda on Today at 12:06:01 PMWe're still limping to what looks like  5-7 wins in conference. James and Stevens look good. Otherwise im not going to get excited about almost winning a few games against mediocre big east talent

These results should not be vindication for Shaka to take the majority of the returning roster into next season.

I'm just a big believer that the team we have now is much different than the one we saw in the first two months of the season. We've been playing like a tournament/bubble team for a month.

If that continues, I don't think the first two months of the season mean anything. I'd be comfortable running it back (minus Tre, Sean, and Caedin).

Understand if you see it differently

panda

Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 12:15:33 PMDrama king alert.  Roster overhaul to compete next year?  What's your win prediction if MU brings in 2 or less transfers for next season?

We're in trouble if we only add 2 transfers. That means there is only 1 outgoing player and that's most likely jones. Which means we get another off season of Caedin Hamilton redemption hype and tre Norman defensive bulldog propaganda.

Way too much deadweight would return to be anything more than a bubble team at best.

panda

Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 12:19:06 PMI'm just a big believer that the team we have now is much different than the one we saw in the first two months of the season. We've been playing like a tournament/bubble team for a month.

If that continues, I don't think the first two months of the season mean anything. I'd be comfortable running it back (minus Tre, Sean, and Caedin).

Understand if you see it differently

A bubble team whose best win is against providence and with losses to butler and DePaul? Sorry I don't think so

CountryRoads

Quote from: panda on Today at 11:44:04 AMA 20 loss team needs a complete overhaul to compete. Otherwise you're relying on freshmen and sophomores ie same problem we have this year.

I'd like to see 4 more spots open this spring and have 5 to work with. That's only a 3rd of the scholarships, so I'm not sure if that qualifies as a complete overhaul but that should give us sufficient flexibility to field a more competitive team from the get go next year. Even if they only add 2 or 3 more players, having an open scholarship or 2 would be nice if an opportunity arose at a random time. Don't see the value in keeping the dead weight around another year.

Previous topic - Next topic