Shaka cost us the game tonite

[The Sultan]

So Shaka has been plugging in transfers the past three years? 

No, but Relationships Growth Victory certainly can work with transfers. People have this strange idea that Shaka and Marquette are slavishly tied to a model regardless of the results. They are going to find out very shortly that this isn't the case, and RGV will still be splashed around.

[muwarrior69]

Shaka did not cost us the game, Chase did. He was a virtual no show last night. He was to be our team leader and ceded that to NJ over the last few games.

[WhiteTrash]

No, but Relationships Growth Victory certainly can work with transfers. People have this strange idea that Shaka and Marquette are slavishly tied to a model regardless of the results. They are going to find out very shortly that this isn't the case, and RGV will still be splashed around.

I agree with you, but it appears like he did have a slavish tie to the model for the past three years. I have great confidence he will adjust and this year will be a blip on the radar.

[Pakuni]

No, but Relationships Growth Victory certainly can work with transfers. People have this strange idea that Shaka and Marquette are slavishly tied to a model regardless of the results. They are going to find out very shortly that this isn't the case, and RGV will still be splashed around.

I don't know that they're slavishly tied to a model going forward, especially after this season, but it's fair to say that they were slavishly tied to it the past two offseasons.
The 2023-24 squad was deep and talented enough that there was really no obvious need to dip into the portal. But last year's and this year's squads had some pretty obvious holes that Shaka and Co. chose not to address. That's because of some combination of a)their dislike (bordering on disdain) for the transfer market and b)a mistaken confidence that their brand of RGV could fill those holes from within and they didn't need to hedge their bets on players like Hamilton, Sean Jones and Lowery taking a leap.

[Scoop Snoop]

I agree with you, but it appears like he did have a slavish tie to the model for the past three years. I have great confidence he will adjust and this year will be a blip on the radar.

Yep on the bolded. I think he will adjust, but do not have great confidence because he impresses me as a "true believer". That's why I think it will be difficult for him to change course.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

b)a mistaken confidence that their brand of RGV could fill those holes from within and they didn't need to hedge their bets on players like Hamilton, Sean Jones and Lowery taking a leap.

This is the bit I don't get. Did he have mistaken confidence, or did Shaka simply strike out finding upgrades in the portal? Because Lowery I understand, he had obviously athleticism and skill, but Jones and Hamilton?

I'm just a dopey message board poster, but even I could see there was no way for MU to be successful if they were going to be relied upon to be significant contributors.

[TheGym]

Shaka didnt cost the game. Nigel was brutal and more or less gave Nova a run in the last 2:30.

Very frosh game from him in the last 10 or so. Kudos to nova for flusterimg him in the press.

This is exactly what cost us the game.  Two turnovers on the last three possession and gave up an offensive rebound that could have easily been gotten if all he did was box out.  He is a 20 year old freshman so I am less likely to give him the benefit of the doubt.