Another ICE shooting in MN

[Scoop Snoop]

In what universe are federal agents upholding the law the equivalence of fascists or nazis?

Please explain what laws exist that allow federal agents to murder protesters. "Upholding the law" my ass.

[Jay Bee]

Stunner: Kristi Noem, her Gestapo, and other federal officials lied like rugs ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/us/prosecutor-dismiss-charges-men-shot-by-ice.html?

Thank goodness for video evidence, or the Gestapo agents would get away with all of their crimes.

^^^ This seems political. Ban this clown boy.

[rocky_warrior]

^^^ This seems political. Ban this clown boy.

Discussing disgusting murderers is not political.

[#UnleashJosh]

^^^ This seems political. Ban this clown boy.

Discussing disgusting murderers is not political.

        

[MU82]

^^^ This seems political. Ban this clown boy.

Seriously, why do you support murderers and liars who cover up for them?

[Jay Bee]

Seriously, why do you support murderers and liars who cover up for them?

You're making things up.

[tower912]

Lenten prayers for you.

[WellsstreetWanderer]

No, that's not the definition of fascism.
Are we talking about the same Mussolini who was kicked out of the Italian socialist party during WWI and promptly became an avowed anti-socialist?
Read a book, my guy. Or at least a Wikipedia page.

I think it is intellectually lazy to parrot vile names for people one disagrees with  it puts someone on par with the teilzeitdinkers screaming on the streets at lawful agents  there is no equivalence with Nazis ;arresting
adjudicated criminals is lawful and moral

[Jables1604]

...there is no equivalence with Nazis ;arresting
adjudicated criminals is lawful and moral

What about murdering innocent people?

[The Sultan]

What are murdering innocent people?

Or arresting and deporting people who are legally able to be here? Or doing so without the Constitutional guaranty of due process?

Defending this nonsense may not make one a Nazi sympathizer, but it certainly makes them anti-American to the core.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

I think it is intellectually lazy to parrot vile names for people one disagrees with  it puts someone on par with the teilzeitdinkers screaming on the streets at lawful agents  there is no equivalence with Nazis ;arresting
adjudicated criminals is lawful and moral

You're right--there are some significant differences.




Also, here is your lawful and moral:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/courts-have-ruled-4400-times-that-ice-jailed-people-illegally-it-hasnt-stopped-2026-02-14/

[WellsstreetWanderer]

Wikepedia and Reuters are not the ideal references for truth   but we can disagree with civilty andi appreciate that

[Pakuni]

I think it is intellectually lazy to parrot vile names for people one disagrees with  it puts someone on par with the teilzeitdinkers screaming on the streets at lawful agents  there is no equivalence with Nazis ;arresting
adjudicated criminals is lawful and moral

Would you say that's more or less intellectually lazy than conflating fascism with socialism? Or claiming Benny Mussolini's government was socialist?
Asking for a friend.

Oh, and just fyi, most immigration violations are civil offenses. In most instances, being in the country unlawfully is not a criminal act.

[Jay Bee]

Oh, and just fyi, most immigration violations are civil offenses. In most instances, being in the country unlawfully is not a criminal act.

Do you have numbers on this breakdown? -->

Unlawful presence people who have zero criminal offenses of any type vs.
illegal entry people (crime) and/or other criminal offenses?

[Scoop Snoop]

Wikepedia and Reuters are not the ideal references for truth  but we can disagree with civilty andi appreciate that

Can we agree that ICE should attempt to handle matters "with civility"?

[MU82]

Wikepedia and Reuters are not the ideal references for truth   but we can disagree with civilty andi appreciate that

Wikipedia, obviously, but Reuters is generally a well-respected news organization.

Which media outlets are your "ideal references for truth"?

[Pakuni]

Do you have numbers on this breakdown? -->

Unlawful presence people who have zero criminal offenses of any type vs.
illegal entry people (crime) and/or other criminal offenses?

Reading is hard.

[Jay Bee]

Reading is hard.

I read and understood what you posted just fine - I'm axing a question. Sounds like you do not know.

[Pakuni]

I read and understood what you posted just fine - I'm axing a question. Sounds like you do not know.

Your question does not logically follow from my post.

But to answer your question:

52,504 out of 70,766 — or 74.2% - held in ICE detention have no criminal conviction according to data current as of January 25, 2026. Many of those convicted committed only minor offenses, including traffic violations.

https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/

Hope this helps!

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Do you have numbers on this breakdown? -->

Unlawful presence people who have zero criminal offenses of any type vs.
illegal entry people (crime) and/or other criminal offenses?

https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/

74+% with no criminal convictions, with "many of those convicted committed only minor offenses, including traffic violations."

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Wikepedia and Reuters are not the ideal references for truth   but we can disagree with civilty andi appreciate that

LOL

[Jay Bee]

https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/

74+% with no criminal convictions, with "many of those convicted committed only minor offenses, including traffic violations."

This was not my question.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

This was not my question.

I'm sorry, I'll contact that organization and ask them to re-run the data to match your exact phrasing rather than this cut which gets to the essence of your question.