collapse

Resources

Stud of Butler Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr2
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by tower912
[Today at 12:05:26 PM]


In-season improvement by wadesworld
[Today at 12:05:20 PM]


Shaka's Credibility by brewcity77
[Today at 11:59:23 AM]


Senior shooting by muwarrior69
[Today at 11:39:27 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by jfp61
[Today at 11:13:12 AM]


RIP Brian Brunkhorst by MarquetteMike1977
[January 25, 2026, 08:20:14 PM]


Excuse my language by Newsdreams
[January 25, 2026, 06:15:40 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  Creighton

Marquette
76
Marquette vs.
Creighton
Date/Time: Jan 27, 2026, 8:30pm
TV: TNT/TruTV
Schedule for 2025-26
Butler
87

muwarrior69


Scoop Snoop

Quote from: Billy Hoyle on Today at 10:37:35 AMwe have big donors, it's how we could buy out Wojo.

It's not that we have to compete with Duke, but how about Nova and Creighton?

OK, now I'm in. No reason that Marquette cannot compete with most high majors, especially within the BE. It is the obsession with measuring us against the wealthiest teams and a natty that annoys me.

I think the most important step would be for Shaka to drop his self-imposed rules on working with agents and his pay structure. 
Wild horses couldn't drag me into either political party, but for very different reasons.

"All of our answers are unencumbered by the thought process." NPR's Click and Clack of Car Talk.

muwarrior69

#102
Quote from: Billy Hoyle on Today at 10:37:35 AMwe have big donors, it's how we could buy out Wojo.

It's not that we have to compete with Duke, but how about Nova and Creighton?
Sure, we bought out Wojo to get Shaka, but that was before NIL (or it just started I don't recall) and now revenue sharing. It would be nice to compete against Duke and we should be competing with UCONN. Like you say if we have the donors let get those top 75 recruits and transfers or one of those international "pros" who can actually play ball.

muwarrior69

#103
Quote from: Scoop Snoop on Today at 10:46:00 AMOK, now I'm in. No reason that Marquette cannot compete with most high majors, especially within the BE. It is the obsession with measuring us against the wealthiest teams and a natty that annoys me.

I think the most important step would be for Shaka to drop his self-imposed rules on working with agents and his pay structure. 
Again that step will be answered in the off season and yes, we should be competing with UCONN.

brewcity77

Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 10:55:56 AMSure, we bought out Wojo to get Shaka, but that was before NIL (or it just started I don't recall) and now revenue sharing. It would be nice to compete against Duke and we should be competing with UCONN. Like you say if we have the donors let get those top 75 recruits and transfers or one of those international "pros".

We have the donors to compete. No, we aren't going to have Kentucky's $22M payroll, but what has that gotten them? We can compete at the top of this league and with most high majors because they are going to prioritize football and you don't have as many scholarships to fill in basketball. Will we need to be smarter with our money? Sure. But that's always been the case.

muwarrior69

#105
Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 11:06:30 AMWe have the donors to compete. No, we aren't going to have Kentucky's $22M payroll, but what has that gotten them? We can compete at the top of this league and with most high majors because they are going to prioritize football and you don't have as many scholarships to fill in basketball. Will we need to be smarter with our money? Sure. But that's always been the case.
Does UCONN prioritize football over basketball? That is who we have to compete with and they are winning Nattys more than any other school since 2000.

Billy Hoyle

Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 10:55:56 AMSure, we bought out Wojo to get Shaka, but that was before NIL (or it just started I don't recall) and now revenue sharing. It would be nice to compete against Duke and we should be competing with UCONN. Like you say if we have the donors let get those top 75 recruits and transfers or one of those international "pros" who can actually play ball.

Here is the reality for most P4 programs with football (this is an interview with BC's AD):

Boston College AD Blake James projects a distribution cap of $21.3M for the upcoming year with 75% allocated to football, 15% to men's basketball, and 5% to women's basketball. While the internal revenue share is maxed, James admitted the program trails top peers like Indiana in "third-party NIL" deals, emphasizing the need to grow that external bucket via partners like Van Wagner.

That's $3.19 million BC basketball has to distribute in rev share. MU definitely has more than $3.19 million to distribute to hoops. If our number is around $6 million total (I think I'm being conservative with that number), and we give 75% to MBB, then that's $4.5 million. Very few P4 schools are giving MBB more than 15%.

But like BC, we need third party NIL to step up, and that's where the donors come in. But, there's no way we shouldn't be able to afford a Drayton Jones or Michael Ajayi like Butler could this past off-season (along with their top portal signee, who is injured for the year). 
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

brewcity77

Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 11:19:09 AMDoes UCONN prioritize football over basketball? That is who we have to compete with and they are winning Nattys more than any other school since 2000.

I would urge you to read the post you quoted to the end. The answer is literally right there.

Previous topic - Next topic