Shaka's Credibility

[Viper]

Do people care about 20 loss seasons? I would've had zero clue, or care, before seeing this list.

people do. This isn't just losing, btw. It's asss kickings.

[PointWarrior]

Shaka would have some credibility if his current team showed any improvement anywhere - offense, defense, shooting, rebounding, better rotations, inbounds plays, late-game plays -  it's all just crap and not getting any better...

[Scoop Snoop]

Probably. But I guess that's my point. I couldn't tell you, because it's not something anyone really cares about. Losing 19 games instead of 20 would do nothing to change how this season was, at least if you ask me.

I get that  you see this as not being a big deal. Assuming others see it the same way though? I think it makes a huge difference whether it is your team or someone else's, so the "...really cares about" depends upon whom you are speaking to. I will never be able to forget this season, as much as I wish I could. And it matters to me.

[WhiteTrash]

True that nobody can reference the last time X school lost 20 games, just like nobody can reference the last time X school ranked 337th in FG%, but it doesn't mean it's not important.

(Hint: a Milwaukee based school is ranked 337th in FG%)

[#UnleashMalik]

Guys.... yall don't need to keep explaining that Shaka errored with not adding portal players in the off season.


We're All Very well aware