Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

MU/ St.John’s game thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 01:24:56 PM]


Nigel James - Next Season by MU82
[Today at 01:24:00 PM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by MU82
[Today at 01:22:12 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by Mu8891
[Today at 01:11:15 PM]


The Nigel James Conundrum by NCMUFan
[Today at 12:46:18 PM]


Portal by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 12:30:21 PM]


157 minutes by onepost
[Today at 12:21:06 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ DePaul

Marquette
68
Marquette @
DePaul
Date/Time: Jan 17, 2026, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
92

tower912

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 10:39:46 AMWe've reached the point where we're rationalizing 24-point losses to unranked opponents.
Exact opposite. I would have expected the same outcome from a team not named Marquette in the same situation. 
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

Also in honor of Pope Leo,  I have no enemies.  I have brothers and sisters I sometimes disagree with.

wadesworld

#26
Quote from: onepost on Today at 11:20:56 AMAhh here's the weekly semantics schtick from you.
Can't make any on-court arguments this season so into the minutiae you go!

Yes you're right, Zuby played fewer minutes than he does on the season and Marquette lost by 10 points more than the experts and models predicted - pretty pathetic of us!

AKA what I claimed was wrong and now I'll shift the goalposts.  You argued Zuby wasn't on the court for a half (he played 10 minutes in the first and 16 in the second), got called out, and are mad about it (not surprisingly, seems like you're mad a lot).

If you don't want to be called out on making something up, don't make something up.  Kind of funny you're worked up about not having "on-court arguments" when I'm simply responding to your statement (which, ironically, has to do with a player being, well, on the court).

Scoop Snoop

Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 11:25:02 AMAKA what I claimed was wrong and now I'll shift the goalposts.  You argued Zuby wasn't on the court for a half (he played 10 minutes in the first and 16 in the second), got called out, and are mad about it (not surprisingly, seems like you're mad a lot).

If you don't want to be called out on making something up, don't make something up.  Kind of funny you're worked up about not having "on-court arguments" when I'm simply responding to your statement (which, ironically, has to do with a player being, well, on the court).

OUCH!  ;D
Wild horses couldn't drag me into either political party, but for very different reasons.

"All of our answers are unencumbered by the thought process." NPR's Click and Clack of Car Talk.

onepost

#28
Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 11:25:02 AMAKA what I claimed was wrong and now I'll shift the goalposts.  You argued Zuby wasn't on the court for a half (he played 10 minutes in the first and 16 in the second), got called out, and are mad about it (not surprisingly, seems like you're mad a lot).

If you don't want to be called out on making something up, don't make something up.  Kind of funny you're worked up about not having "on-court arguments" when I'm simply responding to your statement (which, ironically, has to do with a player being, well, on the court).

You're wrong.  Zuby played 7:30 in the first and 18:30 in the second - so me saying he sat the "majority" of the first half is factual.  Bryce Hopkins played 2:15 in the first and 16:45 in the second.  "Their two best players sat the entire first half" because they played 10 out of 40 possible minutes is me exaggerating a point, that we were only in that game for a half because their two best players sat for most of it.  I can't believe I literally have to spell this out for you yet again.

You call that "making something up" when it's really not.  I can call Tre Norman "the worst player I've ever seen" and you'd accuse me of lying, but this is a message board where people exaggerate and embellish and we're not guilty of libel last I checked: unless it's you picking nits to take away from how wrong you've been about our entire season.

Big Papi

I would argue that they did in fact quit.  The annoying broadcasters went on and on about how Zuby outhustled our players on that turnover breakaway hoop.   That lack of effort is the definition of quitting. 

This was not going to be a good team this year, and it was very apparent when Shaka didn't go get any experienced players to bridge to the younger talent.  Even Shaka said this team had a lot of growth they needed to do over the summer.  He chose to sink and swim with this group.  It was stubborn on his part. 


That we have gone through significant injuries during his tenure here should have been another nudge to go get an experienced player or two instead of going young again.

Before the season started I would have told you we would lose by double digits at MSG if everything went perfect. 157 minutes of freshmen/soph playing with this roster, yeah that was going to be a bad loss against pretty much anyone on the road. 

It could have been avoided but being stubborn prevailed. 

wadesworld

#30
Quote from: onepost on Today at 11:49:02 AMYou're wrong.  Zuby played 7:30 in the first and 18:30 in the second - so me saying he sat the "majority" of the first half is factual.  Bryce Hopkins played 2:15 in the first and 16:45 in the second.  "Their two best players sat the entire first half" because they played 10 out of 40 possible minutes is me exaggerating a point, that we were only in that game for a half because their two best players sat for most of it.  I can't believe I literally have to spell this out for you yet again.

You call that "making something up" when it's really not.  I can call Tre Norman "the worst player I've ever seen" and you'd accuse me of lying, but this is a message board where people exaggerate and embellish and we're not guilty of libel last I checked: unless it's you picking nits to take away from how wrong you've been about our entire season.

Thanks for confirming that their two best players were not out for a half.  Lot of words to say "I was wrong."

Also, anybody who thinks Bryce Hopkins is the second best player (or best) on St. John's doesn't know ball.

#UnleashMalik

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 10:39:46 AMWe've reached the point where we're rationalizing 24-point losses to unranked opponents.

Hey now, don't forget the part where Ben gold would have made it a 19 point loss.

onepost

Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 12:09:53 PMThanks for confirming that their two best players were not out for a half.  Lot of words to say "I was wrong."

Also, anybody who thinks Bryce Hopkins is the second best player (or best) on St. John's doesn't know ball.

Sellers is having a great season but Ejiofor and Hopkins are their best players.

Previous topic - Next topic