Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The Altercation by brewcity77
[Today at 07:27:13 AM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by dpucane
[Today at 07:08:55 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 01:19:26 AM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by Zog from Margo
[December 28, 2025, 11:15:17 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

panda


wadesworld

Quote from: panda on December 28, 2025, 10:10:13 PMExcellent synopsis below. Keep this for the time capsule

https://x.com/noescalators/status/2005480011596509340?s=46

If you don't know how to read, MUBB's Tweet does make it sound like a fight happened.

panda

Quote from: wadesworld on December 28, 2025, 10:29:04 PMIf you don't know how to read, MUBB's Tweet does make it sound like a fight happened.

Now Shaka will have to answer questions about what actually happened rather than saying goodbye and good luck to zaide.

Just another low during an all time pathetic season.

wadesworld

Quote from: panda on December 28, 2025, 10:30:36 PMNow Shaka will have to answer questions about what actually happened rather than saying goodbye and good luck to zaide.

Just another low during an all time pathetic season.

I'm certain the media would've never asked him about Zaide leaving in the middle of the season if not for MUBB's Tweet.

Good thing we've established Shaka is a liar to the media already, so he can just do that some more.

panda

Quote from: wadesworld on December 28, 2025, 10:33:35 PMI'm certain the media would've never asked him about Zaide leaving in the middle of the season if not for MUBB's Tweet.

Good thing we've established Shaka is a liar to the media already, so he can just do that some more.

The line of questioning will be much different now than if Marquette account never responded.

Their acknowledgment gives validity to the fact something along those lines occurred.

wadesworld

Quote from: panda on December 28, 2025, 10:36:47 PMThe line of questioning will be much different now than if Marquette account never responded.

Their acknowledgment gives validity to the fact something along those lines occurred.

How?

nyg

#6
MU pr department could have and maybe should have wrote "There was no physical altercation", or if they wanted to get specific, "It was a verbal altercation". That is of course if there was no physical contact.

Maybe if Lowery has a social media account, he can help out Shaka the coach that recruited and developed him, by writing something denying the alleged fight. 

Let's see if the reporter Ben Steele earns his pay as a beat reporter and can obtain the true, actual facts about what occurred.  I am sure he has contacts/sources and there were probably numerous witnesses who can verify if such an incident took place.  But, sometimes reporters will not print it in order to save face with the team they cover, fear of losing personal contacts with the team.

Pakuni

Quote from: panda on December 28, 2025, 10:36:47 PMThe line of questioning will be much different now than if Marquette account never responded.

Their acknowledgment gives validity to the fact something along those lines occurred.

There wasn't an acknowledgement. There was a denial. Some of you are intentionally misreading the post - which certainly could have been better worded - so you can have faux outrage over the situation.

MU82

I haven't read all the twits about this. Does any one of them claim that a physical altercation happened?

When I first saw the word "altercation," I actually assumed it was verbal, because physical altercations between athletes and coaches are pretty damn rare these days.

I mean, just a few days ago, Steve Kerr and Draymond Green definitely had an altercation. And it definitely wasn't physical. That kind of thing happens fairly often.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Viper

I'm with Zaide. Drop gloves on Cody Hatt? Dude definitely has a punchable face. Our next game, tv close-ups of the bench just got interesting. (If it happened, of course 😉)
Support CBP 🇺🇸

SOSW

Quote from: Pakuni on December 28, 2025, 11:00:55 PMThere wasn't an acknowledgement. There was a denial. Some of you are intentionally misreading the post - which certainly could have been better worded - so you can have faux outrage over the situation.

Yes. They certainly could have worded it better.

Or better yet, not said anything at all! No one would have cared. 

This was all completely preventable by Mubb. Some of you just don't seem to realize that.

Jay Bee

Quote from: Pakuni on December 28, 2025, 11:00:55 PMThere wasn't an acknowledgement. There was a denial. Some of you are intentionally misreading the post - which certainly could have been better worded - so you can have faux outrage over the situation.

Eh, I read it and see #muMbb acknowledging an "altercation", don't you? It's problematic, dumb and dangerous. #lawsuitsOnDeck?

May help Zaide get granted immediate eligibility.
The portal is NOT closed.

brewcity77

So many own goals here. First and foremost, shouldn't Marquette have learned not to respond to troll accounts after the Danielle Josetti disaster trying to argue against the Providence burner "Tyler can't read" jokes?

But in this case, it's not just that they responded to the troll, but instead of deleting and moving on, gave a non-confirmation confirmation by using the wording "the altercation" which turns it from a rumor into something that can be read to have happened.

Presumably, the correction was done by one of the adults in the room after realizing the initial response was poor, and if that's the case speaks really poorly of the adults in the room. This is comms 101 where who you respond to and words you choose to respond matter.

And of course, this will all be more heavily scrutinized in a year where there aren't any wins to discuss. Just PR idiocy all around.

Previous topic - Next topic