collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

MU82

Quote from: onepost on December 21, 2025, 08:38:40 PMDo you think we see Shaka on the MU sidelines for 2026-2027, 82?

It would be nothing more than a guess, but I'd guess yes. Nothing would surprise me at this point, though.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

brewcity77

Quote from: MuggsyB on December 21, 2025, 03:24:41 PMI stated after the Valpo game (a game we should have lost) that we are somewhere around #225-250 in the country.  Perhaps we're closer to #300.

First, you were wrong then and are even more wrong now. We've played 5 teams that are sub-200 & gone 5-0 in those games by an average margin of 20.4 ppg.

Quote from: MuggsyB on December 21, 2025, 03:24:41 PMNow maybe it doesn't matter if we're 225, 250, 275, 300 etc...When you have a team who isn't capable of competing with a top 100 squad and zero light at the end of the tunnel?

This, however, is correct. We're probably in the 125-175 area nationally. Good enough to soundly beat teams of lesser talent, good enough to compete but lose against top-50 to 100 teams, and bad enough to get drubbed by anyone better.

But in the Big East, whether we're #150 (feels about right) or #300 (a foolish assertion but let's go with it) that simply isn't good enough to compete in a league of mostly top-100 teams.

While you're being hyperbolic with your ranking takes, what is true is that we're a bottom-2 team in this league and there's no clear evidence we're ahead of DePaul. That is simply unacceptable at a program with Marquette's history & resources.

vogue65

Nobody mentions the admission standards.
Why did Buzz leave?
He couldn't recruit.
Why did Al hang it up?
He said, because he couldn't recruit.

The Big East was set up to compete with the Ivy League.  So here we are, enjoy.

The bar was set at mid-major with a TV contract.
Now with pay-per-view the world has changed again.

I'm glad I'getting SS, it will help pay for all my streaming subscriptions.

What does being old give me?
Experience and strategic thinking.



MuggsyB

Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 07:04:20 AMFirst, you were wrong then and are even more wrong now. We've played 5 teams that are sub-200 & gone 5-0 in those games by an average margin of 20.4 ppg.

This, however, is correct. We're probably in the 125-175 area nationally. Good enough to soundly beat teams of lesser talent, good enough to compete but lose against top-50 to 100 teams, and bad enough to get drubbed by anyone better.

But in the Big East, whether we're #150 (feels about right) or #300 (a foolish assertion but let's go with it) that simply isn't good enough to compete in a league of mostly top-100 teams.

While you're being hyperbolic with your ranking takes, what is true is that we're a bottom-2 team in this league and there's no clear evidence we're ahead of DePaul. That is simply unacceptable at a program with Marquette's history & resources.

Fair points Brew.  But have you considered we are far worse right now than when we played these total cupcakes??  And that we essentially lost to Valpo at home?   Your last sentence is 100% indisputably accurate.  We simply can't have this at MU. 

MuggsyB

Brew,

Albany, Southern, Little Rock, and Central Michigan are beyond an abomination. I honestly don't care what the NET, Pomeroy, or the computers think.   We have one win, at home, in overtime, vs Valpo, when their best player got injured.  I guess there are a lot of bad teams but there's no way we're top #200. 

jfp61

Were gonna finish 150th because all the good teams in our conference are gonna play some walkons againist us and Michael Phillips is gonna cook them.

MuggsyB

I just checked. We're #183 in the NET.  Our best win was against #236 Valpo.  And again, we lose that contest if their best player doesn't get hurt.  The other 4 wins we have are against teams #287 or worse.  I repeat, #287 or worse.   So yes, we're actually that bad.

mileskishnish72

Quote from: hawk on December 21, 2025, 12:49:55 PM.This whole RGV stuff is clearly a fiction if you look at the seniors and juniors on this team, not much G at all. 
Not much V either.

MU82

Quote from: MuggsyB on Today at 12:30:22 PMwe essentially lost to Valpo at home

We didn't.

Quote from: MuggsyB on Today at 12:37:15 PMI honestly don't care what the NET, Pomeroy, or the computers think.    I guess there are a lot of bad teams but there's no way we're top #200. 

You honestly don't care for facts.

It's easy to rip everything going on with Marquette basketball. You need not make sh!t up, too.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

oldwarrior81

Those Dukiet teams were hard to watch.  1988 was particulary ugly. But they won 10.
Coincidence they moved out of the Arena at year's end?
I don't think the current fanbase realizes how unenjoyable they were to watch.

included losses:
to Iona (16-loss team) by 15. 
to Fordham (15-loss team) by 20.
Creighton (16-loss team) by 14 at home
to the Irish. twice. Once by 18, the second time by 22.

lost 9 of 10 in the middle of the season, and fittingly closed out on a 6 game losing streak.

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 02:07:43 PMWe didn't.

You honestly don't care for facts.

It's easy to rip everything going on with Marquette basketball. You need not make sh!t up, too.

It's spiritually correct though. #183 NET. Vegas would probably handicap #183 playing #200 on a neutral court as #183 -1

It's a distinction without a difference. We are abysmal!

Previous topic - Next topic