A question for the Scoop elders

[MU82]

Do you think we see Shaka on the MU sidelines for 2026-2027, 82?

It would be nothing more than a guess, but I'd guess yes. Nothing would surprise me at this point, though.

[brewcity77]

I stated after the Valpo game (a game we should have lost) that we are somewhere around #225-250 in the country.  Perhaps we're closer to #300.

First, you were wrong then and are even more wrong now. We've played 5 teams that are sub-200 & gone 5-0 in those games by an average margin of 20.4 ppg.

Now maybe it doesn't matter if we're 225, 250, 275, 300 etc...When you have a team who isn't capable of competing with a top 100 squad and zero light at the end of the tunnel?

This, however, is correct. We're probably in the 125-175 area nationally. Good enough to soundly beat teams of lesser talent, good enough to compete but lose against top-50 to 100 teams, and bad enough to get drubbed by anyone better.

But in the Big East, whether we're #150 (feels about right) or #300 (a foolish assertion but let's go with it) that simply isn't good enough to compete in a league of mostly top-100 teams.

While you're being hyperbolic with your ranking takes, what is true is that we're a bottom-2 team in this league and there's no clear evidence we're ahead of DePaul. That is simply unacceptable at a program with Marquette's history & resources.

[vogue65]

Nobody mentions the admission standards.
Why did Buzz leave?
He couldn't recruit.
Why did Al hang it up?
He said, because he couldn't recruit.

The Big East was set up to compete with the Ivy League.  So here we are, enjoy.

The bar was set at mid-major with a TV contract.
Now with pay-per-view the world has changed again.

I'm glad I'getting SS, it will help pay for all my streaming subscriptions.

What does being old give me?
Experience and strategic thinking.

[MuggsyB]

First, you were wrong then and are even more wrong now. We've played 5 teams that are sub-200 & gone 5-0 in those games by an average margin of 20.4 ppg.

This, however, is correct. We're probably in the 125-175 area nationally. Good enough to soundly beat teams of lesser talent, good enough to compete but lose against top-50 to 100 teams, and bad enough to get drubbed by anyone better.

But in the Big East, whether we're #150 (feels about right) or #300 (a foolish assertion but let's go with it) that simply isn't good enough to compete in a league of mostly top-100 teams.

While you're being hyperbolic with your ranking takes, what is true is that we're a bottom-2 team in this league and there's no clear evidence we're ahead of DePaul. That is simply unacceptable at a program with Marquette's history & resources.

Fair points Brew.  But have you considered we are far worse right now than when we played these total cupcakes??  And that we essentially lost to Valpo at home?   Your last sentence is 100% indisputably accurate.  We simply can't have this at MU. 

[MuggsyB]

Brew,

Albany, Southern, Little Rock, and Central Michigan are beyond an abomination. I honestly don't care what the NET, Pomeroy, or the computers think.   We have one win, at home, in overtime, vs Valpo, when their best player got injured.  I guess there are a lot of bad teams but there's no way we're top #200. 

[jfp61]

Were gonna finish 150th because all the good teams in our conference are gonna play some walkons againist us and Michael Phillips is gonna cook them.

[MuggsyB]

I just checked. We're #183 in the NET.  Our best win was against #236 Valpo.  And again, we lose that contest if their best player doesn't get hurt.  The other 4 wins we have are against teams #287 or worse.  I repeat, #287 or worse.   So yes, we're actually that bad.