collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by DoctorV
[December 28, 2025, 11:43:16 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by Zog from Margo
[December 28, 2025, 11:15:17 PM]


The Altercation by Pakuni
[December 28, 2025, 11:00:55 PM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by Pakuni
[December 28, 2025, 08:38:45 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

SOSW

Quote from: Elonsmusk on December 28, 2025, 09:59:55 PMAre you serious with this?  They "literally" confirmed there was no altercation.

Is the English language usually this difficult for you?

Pakuni

Quote from: SOSW on December 28, 2025, 09:45:14 PMSo Marquette responds to a known Twitter troll, and in the process confirms that an altercation occurred, and people here legitimately think it's no big deal??

This is a master class on how to NOT manage a situation. There is no need to say anything. Just ignore it!

Now Shaka is going to be asked about it and Zaide has been tossed under the bus.

Just dumb PR all around.


jfc, some people are struggling to read tonight.
The Marquette X account said reports of an altercation were inaccurate, aka not true. It didn't confirm anything.




panda

Quote from: wadesworld on December 28, 2025, 10:00:23 PMAnd literally nobody will care about it in 24 hours. Except for Scoopers who just want to cry about the program.

Inaccurate

The #altercation just overtook the letter 

SOSW

Quote from: Pakuni on December 28, 2025, 10:05:27 PMjfc, some people are struggling to read tonight.
The Marquette X account said reports of an altercation were inaccurate, aka not true. It didn't confirm anything.

No. They said the reports of *the* altercation were inaccurate.

Very different. Essentially they confirmed an altercation took place.


Elonsmusk

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on December 28, 2025, 10:03:48 PMWell for one. Don't reply to clowns at all.

Responding made it seem worthy of attention. If it didn't happen, let it be nothing. Then they worded it as if there was an altercation. Not exactly doing Zaide any good.

How did MU word it as if there was an altercation??  And you're a walking contradiction - don't respond to a burner account that puts our FALSE info about and altercation involving Zaide an Cody Hatt - but when MU clarifies the info about an altercation was inaccurate that "not exactly doing Zaide any good?"

panda

Quote from: Elonsmusk on December 28, 2025, 10:12:06 PMHow did MU word it as if there was an altercation??  And you're a walking contradiction - don't respond to a burner account that puts our FALSE info about and altercation involving Zaide an Cody Hatt - but when MU clarifies the info about an altercation was inaccurate that "not exactly doing Zaide any good?"

Sounds like Zaide won the fight and Marquette is doing damage control

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Holy hell.

Our fan base has the team it deserves.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: Elonsmusk on December 28, 2025, 10:12:06 PMHow did MU word it as if there was an altercation??  And you're a walking contradiction - don't respond to a burner account that puts our FALSE info about and altercation involving Zaide an Cody Hatt - but when MU clarifies the info about an altercation was inaccurate that "not exactly doing Zaide any good?"

The said "information about the altercation isn't true." So there was an altercation but the details were wrong? That's how it reads.

If there is no altercation say "an altercation" not "the altercation". Their wording was terrible and they got multiple cracks at coming up with something clear.
VIOLENCE!

Boozemon Barro

Marquette needs to put this to bed and release the CCTV of coach Hatt body slamming Zaide.

SOSW

Quote from: Elonsmusk on December 28, 2025, 10:12:06 PMHow did MU word it as if there was an altercation??  And you're a walking contradiction - don't respond to a burner account that puts our FALSE info about and altercation involving Zaide an Cody Hatt - but when MU clarifies the info about an altercation was inaccurate that "not exactly doing Zaide any good?"

Again by saying "the altercation" it confirms there was one.

Elementary English.

Elementary PR is to ignore a known troll. They already released a statement! Just laugh and go to bed. No one will care in the morning.

dpucane

there's been an altercation in the kitchen



onepost

Don't think Shaka is here next season.
More confident than ever he exits stage left in March.

wadesworld

There were no specifics about what occurred with "the altercation" in the original Tweet. All that was said was that he was released after "an altercation." Marquette responded that the information about the altercation is inaccurate. Meaning an altercation did not occur. This really isn't this hard or complicated.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: onepost on December 28, 2025, 10:21:32 PMDon't think Shaka is here next season.
More confident than ever he exits stage left in March.

Like a firing or bouncing like he did at Texas?
VIOLENCE!

cheebs09

Quote from: SOSW on December 28, 2025, 10:17:06 PMAgain by saying "the altercation" it confirms there was one.

Elementary English.

Elementary PR is to ignore a known troll. They already released a statement! Just laugh and go to bed. No one will care in the morning.

I read the edit to clarify Zaide is still leaving the program and just the altercation part is inaccurate. However, I think it's dumb they responded to the troll account in the first place.

Boozemon Barro

Quote from: wadesworld on December 28, 2025, 10:21:58 PMThere were no specifics about what occurred with "the altercation" in the original Tweet. All that was said was that he was released after "an altercation." Marquette responded that the information about the altercation is inaccurate. Meaning an altercation did not occur. This really isn't this hard or complicated.

I'm frankly worried about the quality of English majors that the university is pumping out.

wadesworld

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on December 28, 2025, 10:15:17 PMThe said "information about the altercation isn't true." So there was an altercation but the details were wrong? That's how it reads.

If there is no altercation say "an altercation" not "the altercation". Their wording was terrible and they got multiple cracks at coming up with something clear.

It reads that way if you don't know how to read.

Markusquette

Quote from: wadesworld on December 28, 2025, 10:21:58 PMThere were no specifics about what occurred with "the altercation" in the original Tweet. All that was said was that he was released after "an altercation." Marquette responded that the information about the altercation is inaccurate. Meaning an altercation did not occur. This really isn't this hard or complicated.

Their reply doesn't make me any more convinced there was no altercation than one taking place. That's the problem.

WolfganghisKhan

This is why you don't respond from the official account. Nothing to gain, a lot to lose.

withoutbias

Quote from: onepost on December 28, 2025, 10:21:32 PMDon't think Shaka is here next season.
More confident than ever he exits stage left in March.

Keep us updated on what they're saying on Discord like you do.

withoutbias

Quote from: brewcity77 on December 28, 2025, 05:39:14 PMNo relationships. No growth. No victory.


You should write a blog and get another Marquette basketball coach fired.

Boozemon Barro

Quote from: WolfganghisKhan on December 28, 2025, 10:28:23 PMThis is why you don't respond from the official account. Nothing to gain, a lot to lose.

Oh I'm not so sure anything was lost. Certainly not a lot was lost. I'm trying to think of the worst case scenario, and I'm coming up with nothing.

JTJ3

Quote from: withoutbias on December 28, 2025, 10:31:06 PMKeep us updated on what they're saying on Discord like you do.

Not sure what a Discord is saying, but that talk has started to get stronger the last couple weeks.

Lots of non-blueblood ACC jobs are gonna open that make sense.  Can take the roster from here with him too since theyre all from that part of the country.

cheebs09

Quote from: JTJ3 on December 28, 2025, 10:33:55 PMNot sure what a Discord is saying, but that talk has started to get stronger the last couple weeks.

Lots of non-blueblood ACC jobs are gonna open that make sense.  Can take the roster from here with him too since theyre all from that part of the country.

I don't think Shaka takes transfers.

Previous topic - Next topic