collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by MuggsyB
[Today at 11:55:14 AM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by MuggsyB
[Today at 11:50:20 AM]


Top 50 HS Basketball recruits vs the Portal by Silkk the Shaka
[Today at 10:46:06 AM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 10:11:05 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 01:04:32 AM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[December 23, 2025, 09:59:13 PM]


A question for the Scoop elders by muwarrior69
[December 23, 2025, 03:51:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Billy Hoyle

Quote from: Galway Eagle on Today at 08:39:55 AMYes this, shakas done great over 4 years, this is not a down year it's a bottom falling out year and pro Shaka need to call it what it is. Then due to his previous statements people are right to panic about the next year as well rather than expect a pivot. If he pivots and gets back to respectable program then as 1SE put it great we'll all laugh about it but if he doesn't then as you put it he's not uniquely gifted at having success here

This exactly, Galway. It's four 20+ point losses; it's barely scraping by Valpo. It's brutal home losses to bad, undermanned teams like Maryland and Georgetown. It's going into games, seeing the spread and thinking, "Oh yeah, Purdue will cover that" while people in Mackey are asking "what the hell happened to Marquette?"

If we had lost close games to IU and Purdue and not melted down on our home court against Maryland or Georgetown, and had optimism for turning things around instead of wondering where the BE wins were going to come from, then that would be a "down" year. But this is a meltdown; we're a bad team and other fans and national media all recognize it. 
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

Galway Eagle

#176
Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 08:49:49 AMYes, obviously. Didn't think teal was needed for that one.

If you're thinking making one Sweet 16 every five years is the absolute best Marquette can ever hope for, then we disagree. I mean, Buzz made three in three years, yet one in 5 years is peak Marquette? How does that make sense?
Marquette isn't Duke or Kansas, where anything less than an Elite 8 is a terrible season. But a goal of advancing to the second weekend just 20% of the time doesn't seem outlandish to me.
Why should Marquette should set its standards lower than Xavier? Or Creighton? Or Nova?



Well for starters Creighton has no history to suggest that should be their expectation, till a couple years ago they hadn't advanced in like 60yrs or something.

I think that's a reasonable goal to reach for and it's my hope and believe that Marquette can get there but as Wades and I both pointed out there's zero in our history that doesn't include AL to show that we should reasonably expect that as of now. If you're 55 you've seen MU advance 7 times

Let's look at some data cuts without AL to figure out why we should expect that level of success:

Since AL 7 S16 or higher in 53 tournaments, don't need to be a math wiz to see that that's not ideal.

But Majerus, Dukiet and the first couple O'Neil years were rough so let's go since 93 of 32 potential tournaments 6 S16 or higher, that's less than every 5 years.

Ok well Deane broke us and Crean needed to rebuild, so let's go since he got us back in 02 5 >S16 in 23 potential tournaments which while above 1 every 5yrs is rounded up to every 5yrs.

But let's step back and see the entire program since its first appearance, sans Al, that's 56 potential tournaments we've advanced in 9 of them...

Let's splice it into just Crean and buzz because that's the best stretch since AL. advanced 4x in 15 years. Your win not exactly a glowing example of us at our zenith.

Outside of those three buzz years (one of which id take 2023 100% of the time over), and Al, there's no point in 70 potential tournaments since our program first came on the map that we've been at our "zenith"

I've gotta get the kids ready for Xmas, so I'll leave you with this. This is the first year since i started following MU after deciding to go to Marquette in 08/09 that  I've taken down my flag mid season so I am pissed and disheartened. But I throw out all these stats because without context of our program's position, without one of probably the top 20 or so coaches all time, then we'll always be disappointed.
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

muwarrior69

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on December 23, 2025, 08:42:55 PMThe difference between Shaka and his predecessors is there were plenty of signs he wanted to make this his long-term and perhaps last stop.

I think most here would want that kind of stability, which does assume consistent success.

Obviously, the results this season are completely unacceptable and Shaka has some significant decisions to make once the season ends.

If either side moves on, if feels like we'll be back to being a perpetual stepping stone, where we either fire someone if they don't succeed or someone moves on in 5-6 years if they're successful.

That's why I'm more inclined to give Shaka a bit more leeway to clean up this mess.


Indeed and not just cutting some players. He and his staff have done a poor job of evaluating HS talent. If Shaka stays some of them will have to go as well. RGV could have worked if the players were good enough to pay them to stay (i.e. retention) but they're not. If the season thus far is any indication, we are actually over paying these guys assuming Marquette's financial resources are there. How many on our current roster would be picked by another high major program via the portal?

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Billy Hoyle on Today at 08:50:40 AMwe're a bad team and other fans and national media all recognize it. 

Quote from: Galway Eagle on Today at 10:01:32 AMI've taken down my flag mid season so I am pissed and disheartened.

Yeah, it's disappointing that I can't give a good reason for it when I talk about my MU fandom with people.  Chatted with a random SJU fan on the chair lift, I said something like, "I'm a Marquette fan, but they're pretty bad this year", he responded with something like "Yeah, they're bad.  When they're good they are really good, but they suck this year"

Similar conversation with a friend (Texas fan), who said he turned on one of our games to see how we were doing, and changed the channel quickly because we were so bad.

Anyhow, I'll stop venting.  Merry Christmas y'all.

Billy Hoyle

Quote from: rocky_warrior on Today at 10:56:38 AMYeah, it's disappointing that I can't give a good reason for it when I talk about my MU fandom with people.  Chatted with a random SJU fan on the chair lift, I said something like, "I'm a Marquette fan, but they're pretty bad this year", he responded with something like "Yeah, they're bad.  When they're good they are really good, but they suck this year"

Similar conversation with a friend (Texas fan), who said he turned on one of our games to see how we were doing, and changed the channel quickly because we were so bad.

Anyhow, I'll stop venting.  Merry Christmas y'all.

Merry Christmas to you as well, Rocky, and all fellow posters!
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

tower912

#180
Discussions around here about MU. Me:  Bad this year.  Shaka bet on developing players already in the program and it didn't work this season.  Discussions of where and why  this season went sideways.
  Inevitably segues into discussions about the portal, how much it is hated, and a surprising number of relatively neutral fans were secretly hoping Shaka's no-portal philosophy would pan out.   A fair amount had no idea and were shocked he would even try.
In honor of Pope Leo XIV,
Matthew 25: 31-46

MuggsyB

Quote from: Galway Eagle on Today at 10:01:32 AMWell for starters Creighton has no history to suggest that should be their expectation, till a couple years ago they hadn't advanced in like 60yrs or something.

I think that's a reasonable goal to reach for and it's my hope and believe that Marquette can get there but as Wades and I both pointed out there's zero in our history that doesn't include AL to show that we should reasonably expect that as of now. If you're 55 you've seen MU advance 7 times

Let's look at some data cuts without AL to figure out why we should expect that level of success:

Since AL 7 S16 or higher in 53 tournaments, don't need to be a math wiz to see that that's not ideal.

But Majerus, Dukiet and the first couple O'Neil years were rough so let's go since 93 of 32 potential tournaments 6 S16 or higher, that's less than every 5 years.

Ok well Deane broke us and Crean needed to rebuild, so let's go since he got us back in 02 5 >S16 in 23 potential tournaments which while above 1 every 5yrs is rounded up to every 5yrs.

But let's step back and see the entire program since its first appearance, sans Al, that's 56 potential tournaments we've advanced in 9 of them...

Let's splice it into just Crean and buzz because that's the best stretch since AL. advanced 4x in 15 years. Your win not exactly a glowing example of us at our zenith.

Outside of those three buzz years (one of which id take 2023 100% of the time over), and Al, there's no point in 70 potential tournaments since our program first came on the map that we've been at our "zenith"

I've gotta get the kids ready for Xmas, so I'll leave you with this. This is the first year since i started following MU after deciding to go to Marquette in 08/09 that  I've taken down my flag mid season so I am pissed and disheartened. But I throw out all these stats because without context of our program's position, without one of probably the top 20 or so coaches all time, then we'll always be disappointed.

Put your flag back up!  That's uncalled for Galway! 

Previous topic - Next topic